 |
|
Drug Companies Secretly Influence
the Content of Medical Literature
Pharmaceutical
companies regularly carry out every aspect of a study on their
products, then solicit academics to put their names on the final
papers in order to disguise their involvement, according to an
essay published in the journal PLoS Medicine. Author Sergio
Sismondo calls this practice "ghost management," to distinguish
it from mere ghost writing.
"In extreme cases, drug companies pay for trials by contract research
organizations (CROs), analyze the data in-house, have professionals
write manuscripts, ask academics to serve as authors of those
manuscripts, and pay communication companies to shepherd them
through publication in the best journals," Sismondo writes. "The
resulting articles affect the conclusions found in the medical
literature, and are used in promoting drugs to doctors."
Sismondo points to a study conducted by David Healy and Dinah
Cattell, who analyzed Pfizer's involvement in managing studies
on its product Sertraline. The researchers uncovered that through
a CRO, Pfizer was keeping careful track of these studies from
planning to publication. The articles managed by Pfizer comprised
between 18 and 40 percent of all articles published on the drug
between 1998 and 2000.
These articles were universally positive about the drug and under-reported
its side effects. They were also published in more prestigious
journals and were cited nearly three times as frequently as more
critical articles not managed by the company.
Ghost management has become such a huge industry that a professional
association has even been established for it -- the International
Publication Planning Association.
Sismondo notes that while Healy and Cattell looked at only one
drug, the evidence suggests that ghost management is widespread.
When it was revealed that a journal article on Merck's drug Vioxx
had failed to mention the deaths of certain participants, for
example, lead author Jeffrey Lisse pleaded innoncence: "Merck
designed the trial, paid for the trial, ran the trial," Lisse
said. "Merck came to me after the study was completed and said,
'We want your help to work on the paper.' The initial paper was
written at Merck, and then it was sent to me for editing."
|
|
 |