'Pain Gap' Between Rich and Poor
A novel study that attempts to paint the most accurate and detailed
description yet of how we experience pain
has found that a significant portion of the population -- 28 percent
-- are in pain at any given moment and those with less education
and lower income spend more of their time in pain. Those in pain
are less likely to work or socialize with others and are more
inclined to watch television than the pain-free.
The study, which appears in the May 3 issue of The Lancet, was
prepared by Alan Krueger, a professor of economics at Princeton
University, and Arthur Stone, a professor of psychiatry and behavioral
science at Stony Brook University. The work is the first of its
type, according to the authors, to quantify a "pain gap" in American
society, with the "have-nots" suffering a disproportionate amount
in relation to the "haves."
"To a significant extent, pain does divide the classes," said
Krueger, the Bendheim Professor in Economics and Public Policy.
"And just how the levels of pain vary among people and across
activities -- that has never been found before until now."
Participants with less than a high school degree were found to
report twice the average pain rating throughout the day as did
college graduates. The researchers also found the average pain
rating to be twice as high for those in households with annual
incomes below $30,000 as for those in households with incomes
above $100,000.
"People in households making less than $30,000 a year spend almost
20 percent of their time in moderate to severe pain, compared
with less than 8 percent for those in households with income above
$100,000 a year," Krueger said.
Pain imposes considerable costs on the health care system and
economy. Americans spend billions of dollars each year on painkillers,
more than on any other type of medication. And, when workers are
suffering, the resulting lost productivity costs business more
than $60 billion annually.
Yet, according to Krueger, the phenomenon of pain -- who is in
pain and when -- is not well understood.
The authors constructed a new approach in which participants,
a representative group of 4,000 Americans, reported their activities
and the occurrence and intensity of pain in a diary survey over
a 24-hour period. From the data, the researchers could tie the
participants' pain to certain activities, demographic characteristics
and times of the day. Pain tended to be more frequent when people
received medical care or cared for adults.
The researchers did not ask the survey participants to make a
distinction between physical and mental pain because all pain,
the researchers said, is subjective. Yet clearly, they said, many
of the participants were reporting physical pain.
"The novelty of this study is the possibility to relate people's
pain experiences to their daily activities," wrote Juha H.O. Turunen,
a professor in the Department of Social Pharmacy at the University
of Kuopio in Finland, in an accompanying commentary.
The study, Turunen noted, may have broad implications for policymakers.
Social programs could be constructed to help those who are in
pain while caring for relatives. "The burdensome life of those
caring for their loved ones must be supported by society," he
wrote. The differing levels of pain recorded by varying income
groups, he said, "emphasizes the need for pain preventing measures
such as better ergonomics and better availability of occupational
health services for jobs with high physical strains."
Workers in blue collar jobs reported higher occurrences and more
severe pain than did those in white collar jobs. For blue collar
workers, pain was lower when they were off work than when they
were working. The 13 percent of people who reported a work-related
disability experienced very high rates of pain, and accounted
for 44 percent of the total amount of time that Americans spent
in moderate to severe pain.
Those in the most pain expressed the least satisfaction with
life and health, the authors found. People were more likely to
feel pain when they were alone compared with when they were with
friends or a spouse. In addition, those in pain spent a disproportionate
amount of their time -- almost 25 percent -- watching television,
compared with 16 percent for others.
Alarmingly, those in pain were likely to suffer over years, even
decades. "The pain doesn't go away in many cases, when people
stop working," Krueger said. Pain was higher and more common for
older individuals, but the amount of pain reported remained relatively
constant for individuals from their mid-40s to their mid-70s.
The survey, called the Princeton Affect and Time Survey, was
designed by the authors and administered by the Gallup Organization
in a telephone survey from May through August 2006. The research
was funded by the National Institute on Aging and the Hewlett
Foundation. The study and underlying data are available on Krueger's
website.
The survey is an outgrowth of work Krueger and Stone conducted
with Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman, Princeton's Eugene Higgins
Professor of Psychology Emeritus and senior scholar in the Woodrow
Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, on measuring
well-being and time use.
|