Carbon dioxide, a benign, life giving molecule has been miscast
by a world wide political movement to be an environmental
hazard in what will soon be discovered to be the hoax of the
century. This molecule, CO2 is vital to all life on earth.
It is exhaled by all living things and even comes from nocturnal
emissions by plants. It forms the bubbles in your soda, wine
and beer. Standard air has 370 parts per million (PPM) of
carbon dioxide of which 93% comes from natural sources
which are all beyond human control. These sources include
decomposition of organic matter, exhaling by living things
and volcanic vents, which is by far the greatest atmospheric
source. The climate change hoax is based on faulty science
from two things. First, hoaxers assume that ice layers give
information on temperature like tree rings do with rainfall.
Ice cores from Greenland and Antarctica, from thousands of
years of deposits, are measured for CO2 content of the air
at the time the snow layer was deposited and thickness of
the ice layers. The thickness of these snow fall layers is
then assumed to be an indication of global temperature. There
are numerous errors in this assumption, which have been presented
in a more technical analysis, but for now pretend that this
evidence is true. The hoaxers then show graphs over time with
a near perfect match of CO2 levels and snow thickness and
by implication the earths temperature. The second bit
of proof of human caused global warming is the
Global Climate Model which is available to all at Wikipedia.
By their own admission, this model was developed for SHORT
RANGE weather forecasting and we all know how accurate that
is. This formula, though not given on this web site, has a
hundred parameters each with its own coefficient and exponent.
By manipulating these numbers the hoaxers are able to prove
that an increase of CO2 will raise world temperature.
The climate change hoax is based on faulty science.
The whole concept of greenhouse gas is absurd.
The earth receives a full spectrum of electromagnetic radiation
by day (Duh!) but by night only a portion, the infrared stored
on the surface, is radiated back into space. There is no gaseous
one way control of this energy. The atmospheric gasses can
absorb or reflect some of this energy but can not increase
the incoming amount. Carbon dioxide is a three-atom molecule
that cannot possibly determine that all radiation should be
allowed in by day, but none can escape by night. Consider
the insulation or radiant barrier in your homes attic.
The radiant barrier bounces solar radiant energy away from
your living space in the summer and bounces radiant energy
trying to exit back into your house in the winter. Insulation
does the same thing with convective energy, keeping heat out
in summer and heat in during the winter. The atmosphere behaves
the same way. To claim that any gas, whether CO2 or methane
or any other, can simultaneously allow energy in by day but
block energy exit by night is absurd. To think that the hoaxers
claim of a change in 10 parts per million of CO2 molecules
could effect the earths climate in any way is insane. IF CO2
had these miracle properties then all double pane glass panels
would be filled with CO2 and the magic molecules would work
like little Venetian blinds allowing full heat by day and
no loss at night. In fact, greenhouse glass does not block
radiant heat loss at night, but only a fraction of convective
heat loss that is trapped by the physical glass barrier.
If you Goggle the Last Glacial Maximum you will see maps
of the thousands of square miles of ice and the ocean levels
over 400 ft below current levels. All of this ice melted in
100 years. There is no evidence that humans caused this so
we must look for the force that could cause this change. The
earth does not rotate in a circle around the sun but rather
in an ellipse, varying our distance between 91 and 93 million
miles. Because of this we receive a 4% change in solar radiation
every year but this has no effect on earths climate.
Our seasons are the result of the planets 23 degree axis of
rotation. Our summer occurs when we are farthest from the
sun. The southern hemisphere has summer when the planet is
closest to the sun. There is little difference in latitude
by latitude comparisons of these opposite globe seasons. Based
on this fact, even a 10% change in solar activity would have
negligible effect. A ten percent change is beyond any observed
solar cycle. The earths crust is a 10 to 20 miles thick
layer of solid rock that floats on 7000 miles of molten rock.
Gravity cannot provide the pressure necessary to melt this
much rock. What causes this rock to melt and the earth to
have massive periodic climate changes is the irregular decay
of uranium in our earths core. A more technical analysis
of this earth warming force has been presented to members
of Congress and for scientific peer review but for this presentation
just consider two elements that result from this uranium decay.
Radon, the radioactive gas we are warned about constantly
can only occur from nuclear reaction and has a half-life of
3.8 days. A one pound container of Radon would only weigh
1/8 of an ounce in just 23 days. The fact that Radon is a
health hazard is proof of its daily production. Helium, another
inert element, is eight times lighter than air and all helium
released on earth is lost to outer space in just minutes.
Helium does not come from the break down of any compound but
only from nuclear reaction. It is occurs in natural gas deposits
in just a few locations on earth. The geo-nuclear energy that
melts our core and creates these gases is also the greatest
variable in the earths climate. This geo-nuclear energy
is at present beyond human control or understanding. It is
most convenient for the hoaxers to neglect this greatest variable
in climate change from their defective climate model. The
graphic match of CO2 and ice core layer thickness (earths
temperature ?) is also matched by the amount of ash in the
layer. When volcanic energy is released it produces large
amounts of heat
. and CO2. Blaming CO2
for climate change is like saying ashes cause fire. CO2 is
the effect of heat and not the cause.
Our democracy depends on informed consent. Informed should
not be limited to lies told by a political movement. When
the full scope of the scientific errors involved in this hoax
are exposed everyone will realize this has been the greatest
folly since the flat earth theory. We deserve a real debate.
In this case, the truth will be very inconvenient.