| Early Hepatitis B Vaccines and
the “Man-Made” Origin of HIV/AIDS
This article regards a matter of global urgency transcending
better known AIDS threats. It describes a universal challenge
posed by ever increasing numbers of plagues predicted to depopulate
at least half of the world’s current human inhabitants within
two generations. This documented science virtually proves, through
the process of elimination and a review of the most updated evidence,
the origin of HIV/AIDS as an iatrogenic (i.e., man-made) outcome
of specific vaccination experiments.
Considered reflection on this AIDS science, along with the sociopolitical
correlates and antecedents of this current catastrophe, reveals
the likelihood that myriad other immune dysfunctions, autoimmune
diseases, and cancers, including leukemias, lymphomas, sarcomas,
and other ailments linked to viral infections, have resulted from
previously engineered microbes that have by accident or intent
found their way from cancer virus laboratories into humanity’s
bloodstream by way of the most trusted public health preventative—vaccinations.
If what you are about to read is true, and each point is precisely
stated and meticulously documented, beyond extensive depopulation,
humanity’s very survival may hinge on this recognition, its
implications, and our considered response. Especially relevant,
when reflecting on the following facts, is the wisdom addressed
by the late World Health Organization (WHO) AIDS czar, Dr. Jonathan
Mann, whose life ended tragically on Flight 111 enroute to a European
AIDS conference. “More than a medical scientific problem,”
Dr. Mann said, “AIDS is a sociopolitical imposition.”
Background
AIDS is undoubtedly “man-made.” We can now assert this
“very apparent iatrogenic origin,” versus the “theoretic
iatrogenic origin” of HIV/AIDS because of the rapidly increasing,
now substantial, scientific support for this conclusion. Currently,
international scientific consensus among leading investigators
in this field, many of whose works and words are excerpted below,
holds that HIV/AIDS originated from one or more extraordinary
man-made, not natural, events dating back to the early to mid-1970s.
Especially implicated in initiating the AIDS pandemic, according
to many scientists and scholars, was the hepatitis B vaccine as
detailed in the following pages.
This may come as a surprise, or even quite a shock, to most people
since the mainstream media and most respected medical journals
have yet to herald the following knowledge. As a result most “authorities”
still issue false and misleading claims such as: 1) “the
HB vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS origination has been discussed,
debated, and dismissed by an overwhelming majority of the HIV/AIDS
research community;” 2) “People who claim that AIDS
was man-made provide false information and hearsay;” 3) “It
is sad that public attention and resources are diverted to attend
to such unscientific dribble;” 4) “Man-made origin of
AIDS vaccine proponents do severe damage to the public health
community and vaccination efforts;” and 5) “Those that
advance man-made theories of AIDS have financial motives,”
as though there were no financial interests on the other side
of the debate.
As a pro bono consultant contacted recently by Amnesty International
(AI) members who desired to advance a resolution for the global
organization to investigate this HB vaccine thesis, I was appalled
by the amount of resistance and politicking performed by members
of AI’s so-called “HIV/AIDS Task Force” which sought
$1 billion of relief for human rights violations associated with
HIV/AIDS from the U.S. Government. These funds, the Task Force
reported, were urgently needed to buy drug–cocktails for
persons with HIV/AIDS. Each of the five claims cited above were
issued by members of this Task Force completely ignorant of the
following science.
With regard to the first offensive claim, as the sole author
of “Polio, hepatitis B and AIDS: an integrative theory on
a possible vaccine induced pandemic” published by Harcourt
Publishers, Ltd. of London in the esteemed international journal
of Medical Hypothesis, this well-focused thesis has never been
“discussed, debated,” nor “dismissed” by any
consensus in any official capacity. Although Black Americans have
been polled regarding the origin of HIV/AIDS being man-made, there
has never been a published polling of the scientific community
in this regard, and certainly not one regarding the HB hypothesis
advanced below.
HIV/AIDS Origin Misconceptions Versus Science
Opponents of iatrogenic (or “man-made”) theories of
AIDS have routinely confused hearsay and sporadic media propaganda
with hard science, such as that “discussed, debated”
and not “dismissed” recently at the Royal Society of
London’s inquiry into the origin of this pandemic. They exclusively
focused on the theory that contaminated polio vaccines triggered
the HIV/AIDS pandemic. These proceedings were published in 2001.
Quotes relevant to reasoned consideration of this unique/yet-to-be-tested
hepatitis B vaccine theory of HIV/AIDS follow. These statements
were made by featured presenters, all recognized leaders in this
multidisciplinary field discussing the polio vaccine theory of
AIDS origination. The first of these quotes is especially relevant
to
proposed investigations:
“There should be an investigation by an international committee
mostly composed of non-medical people concerning how a rather
obvious and plausible theory [of AIDS’s origin from contaminated
vaccines] came to be scorned and restricted from publication for
so long, especially when important consequences regarding mankind’s
worst epidemic, and even more important consequences for other
possibly even worse that may be following, hang in the balance.
As a corollary it should be studied why the hypothesis had to
be promoted mainly by outsiders to science and medicine. The ressures
towards investigation (and non-investigation) that emanate from
huge drug companies and their influence in slanting research in
subtle ways should also be examined, as should the role of journals
and peer review in potentially obstructing publications of controversial
kinds.” W.D. Hamilton, quoted by Julian Cribb in “The
origin of acquired immune deficiency syndrome: can science afford
to ignore it?” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (2001) 356:935-938.
“Faced with the terrible burden of AIDS, stories that HIV
was introduced into Africa from the West by an accident such as
OPV [oral polio vaccine] or intentionally by the USA Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA) have gained widespread credence. . . . Nevertheless,
because natural transmission repeatedly occurs, albeit on rare
occasions, does not mean that contamination of a vaccine could
not have been the route on another occasion. As with other infections,
e.g., hepatitis B virus,natural and iatrogenic transmissions of
retroviruses are not mutually exclusive.” Weiss, RA.
Despite studies that have advanced evidence suggesting an earlier
than 1970 origin of HIV/AIDS, “[t]he fact that there were
ten or so synchronous but distinguishable African epidemics is
a definitive feature of AIDS for which the natural transfer theory
[e.g., the “cut hunter transfer”] gives no convincing
account. . . . To summarize these findings regarding the relatively
large number of distinct group M subtypes: no set of likely natural
conditions . . . will adequately simulate so many as ten distinguishable
subtypes in a complex star-like configuration . . . . [T]he onus
is upon the supporters of the natural [not iatrogenic] theory
to account for the unexpectedly large number of HIV-1 subtypes.
Exponential growth of the epidemic(s) is not by itself a satisfactory
explanation (Hahn et al. 2000). . . . The likeliest source of
the multiple subtypes and the synchronization of their conspicuous
diversification is a punctuated origin [i.e., an iatrogenic event].
. . . [I]t is not far-fetched to imagine the ten or so clades
deriving from a single animal (perhaps immunosuppressed and possessing
a swarm of variants) [as might have been the case with chimpanzees
used in the process of vaccine manufacture] or from a few animals
that might have belonged to a single troop or might have been
gang-caged together. The number of animals required is secondary
to the extent of variation in the source at the time of the zoonotic
[i.e., transfer of the virus between species] or iatrogenic event.
The [vaccine] hypothesis makes a case for such a punctuated origin
. . .” Myers G, et al.
“We conclude that SIV cannot become a zoonosis, but requires
adaptive mutations to become HIV. Some modern event must have
aided in the transition of SIV to HIV. Our research indicates
that serial passage of partially adapted SIV between humans could
produce the series of cumulative mutations sufficient for the
emergence of epidemic HIV strains . . . We conclude that increased
unsterile injecting in Africa during the period 1950-1970 provided
the agent for SIV human infections to emerge as epidemic HIV in
the modern era.” Drucker E, et al.
I might interject at this point that this conclusion by Drucker
et al, although seriously undermining natural evolution theorists,
reflects a myopic arrogance unbecoming to their otherwise reasonable
hypothesis. Their conclusion neglects the risks inherent in the
hepatitis B vaccine manufacturing and testing process as detailed
below consistent with the analyses of Myers et al. Obviously,
all of the above authoritative statements contradict “common
knowledge.” The consensus of scientists at this historic
British AIDS origin conference favored additional investigations
into possible iatrogenic sources of the HIVs.
The 1959 HIV Sequence Discovery
In the interest of facilitating progress on this issue, much
publicity has been given to the notion that HIV was discovered
in a 1959 blood sample from Leopoldville, Zaire; and that scientific
consensus holds 1931 as the approximate date of HIV origination.
These superstitions have led to common, yet false, declarations
that HIV/AIDS originated well before the polio vaccination era
and the Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP) that much evidence
below links to the “punctuated origin” of AIDS.
For the record, according to the authors of the 1959 discovery,
they never found, nor alleged to have found, HIV, or anything
like a full virus. According to these authors, even “attempts
to amplify HIV-1 fragments of >300 base pairs (bp) were unsuccessful,
. . . However, after numerous attempts, four shorter sequences
were obtained” that only represented small portions of two
of the six genes of the complete AIDS virus.9
This is why Gao et al, referred to the 1959 sequences as “the
oldest trace of the AIDS pandemic . . . although the precise timing
and circumstance of early events in the SIVcpz/HIV-1 zoonosis
remain obscure.” [Editor’s note for the lay reader,
“SIVcpz” is short for “simian immunodeficiency
virus from the chimpanzee.” This is know to be the closest
viral relative to the human AIDS virus, HIV-1.]
Unfortunately, regarding the 1959 sequences, Zhu et al., left
much room for misinterpretation if not wild speculation by stating
that given the “‘starburst phylogeny,’ HIV-1 was
probably introduced into humans shortly before that time frame,
about a decade or two earlier than previously estimated. . . .”
(Emphasis added.) They speculated the zoonosis might have occurred
“considerably earlier than the late 1940s.” Obviously,
this account is irrelevant to “the extraordinary synchrony
in the 1970s of ten or more distinguishable epidemics” discovered
by Myers et al. Therefore, this later group of researchers concluded
that, with the exception of the 1959 sequences suggesting viral
ancestry, “Clinical, serological and molecular retrospective
studies have all failed to produce any evidence of AIDS or HIV
prior to the 1970s.” (Emphasis added.) As Myers et al., had
initially advanced, the early to mid-1970s “Big Bang”
origin of HIV/AIDS is further supported by most recent scientific
evidence.
As if repeating false assumptions would alter historic and scientific
facts, many contemporary investigators, like those representing
AI’s HIV/AIDS Task Force, continue to imply the SIV to HIV
zoonosis occurred on or before 1959. Many natural evolution theory
evangelists continue to cite the now disproven “cut hunter”
theory to explain the origin of the pandemic. Reflecting on Zhu
et al’s position, however, they simply concluded that the
major-group viruses that dominate the global AIDS pandemic at
present shared a common ancestor in the 1940s or the early 1950s.
However, given confounding factors, including the likelihood of
viral gene recombination during the manufacture and testing of
the HB vaccine, like Korber et al.’s speculation discussed
in the next section, the 1959 “isolate” may hold little,
if any, relevance in determining the origin of HIV/AIDS.
Suffice it to say, no one has ever found a virus predating the
SVCP and the late 1970s. At best they found fragments of what
may have been the complete virus, but more likely pieces of a
progenitor virus they called “a common ancestor” that
dated back to “the 1940s or the early 1950s.” These
and other portions of this “common ancestor” may have
existed for centuries if not millennia. Again, this evidence is
rrelevant when considering the 1970s “punctuated [iatrogenic]
event” recently determined to be undisputable scientific
fact.
More importantly, as Zhu and Ho et al., concluded, “the
role of large-scale vaccination campaigns, perhaps with multiple
uses of non-sterilized needles, should be carefully examined,
. . .” as contributing to the sudden emergence of HIV/AIDS
in North America and Africa simultaneously during the late 1970s.
Read entire
article...
Reference Source: originofaids.com
December 1, 2009
 ...............................................................................................................
|
