Breastfeeding: The Miracle of Mother's
We've all known mothers who can whip out a breast, whip on a baby,
and lactate like mad -- without effort, embarrassment or, in some
Breastfeeding -- if you can -- is the cheapest, cleanest and
healthiest way to nurture a baby. That's not just my opinion or
that of the World Health Organisation (which recommends breastfeeding
for the first six months) -- it's common sense, isn't it?
Perhaps, but Breast v Bottle is still one of the most furious
debates in modern mothering, fuelled by powerful hormones on one
hand, and the billion-pound formula industry on the other. This
month, the fire has been fed by two scientific studies suggesting
that breastfeeding might not be worth the bother let alone
the guilt and distress if you can't or choose not to.
In the first, Prof Sven Carlsen, from the Norwegian University
of Science and Technology in Trondheim, reviewed more than 50
studies into the relationship between health and breastfeeding.
Most concluded that the longer a child was nursed, the healthier
it would be. He attributed this, however, to a healthier pregnancy,
not breast milk, claiming "baby formula is as good as breast
This week, the second study, from Southampton University found
that breastfeeding does not make babies more intelligent. It noted
that breastfed infants tended to be brighter simply because their
mothers were (and brighter women are more likely to breastfeed).
So lactation doesn't make our loved ones brainier or healthier?
Can we break out the bottles and book a long night's pain-free
Not so fast. For every study that concludes that breast milk
is on a par with formula, twice as many conclude it is liquid
gold. They find it protects against stomach bugs, and wards off
asthma and chest infections. Mothers who breastfeed lower their
risk of breast and ovarian cancers, and shed baby weight more
And as every scientist knows, there are different classes of
study some are tiny; some may appear in little-known journals
that other professionals do not rate seriously; and some are paid
for by organisations that have their own point to prove, such
as formula manufacturers.
Formula milk is big business. In Britain, Save the Children reckons
that for every £1 spent in 2006-7 on breastfeeding promotion,
£10 was spent by manufacturers on advertising and promotion.
The market leader, Nestlé, has been subject, off and on,
to a worldwide boycott for more than 30 years because of the way
it is seen to target mothers in countries where formula feed can
be expensive and dangerous to use.
It can be argued that Prof Carlsen's investigation doesn't stand
up to scrutiny, although it was funded by the central Norway regional
health authority and published in the peer-reviewed, although
not well-known, journal Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica.
And the news that breast milk doesn't boost brainpower can be
contradicted by other studies that have found the reverse: a 2001
study concluded that children who were breastfed for fewer than
three months were more likely to score below average for mental
skills at 13 months, and have lower IQ levels at five years, than
those who were breastfed for six months or more.
It is difficult to master science at the best of times
let alone in the fog of exhaustion and hormones caused by giving
birth. Had anyone presented me with a research paper three days
postpartum, I'd have found a use for it but not one connected
to what went into my child.
The most important boon of lactation cannot be analysed or peer-reviewed.
It's something our ancestors knew instinctively: breastfeeding
is a chance for mother and baby to connect physically and emotionally.
And for mum to put her feet up.
February 1, 2010