Top Health Tools
Top Health Tools

Top Reports
Top Reports
Top Articles
Top Articles

Top Reviews
Top Reviews
Canadian Climate Research Calls For Radical Geoengineering Strategy To Block Sun

Editors note: Notice how there is not one mention in this article about the detrimental health effects of decreasing vitamin D from the sun or relationship between geoengineering strategies and human health.

A radical research paper authored by David Keith from the University of Calgary says blocking out some of the sun's rays is a faster and cheaper method of controlling the Earth's temperature than cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

And the unconventional work being done by the prominent Calgary physicist appears to have attracted the attention of the world's richest man.

The same day Keith's research paper was released by the science journal Nature -- a blog titled ScienceInsider reported that Keith and American climate change researchers are being bankrolled by billionaire and Microsoft founder Bill Gates.

The blog said a U.S. researcher and Keith are in charge of deciding how millions of dollars are dispersed to geoengineering -- or climate manipulating -- research projects.

In an interview, Keith declined to provide further details about the funding but confirmed the report was correct.

"Yes, it's true. Bill is funding our stuff," Keith said.

An subsequent inquiry to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation went unanswered.

Keith preferred to speak about how solar radiation could be reflected back into space by releasing megatonnes of light-scattering aerosol particles, or how low-altitude clouds could be created with sea salts.

The Nature article, which calls for a co-operative international research effort worth $1 billion by 2020, suggests a number of sun-reflecting techniques be investigated.

"Many scientists have argued against research on solar-radiation management, saying that developing the capability to perform such tasks will reduce the political will to lower greenhouse-gas emissions," said the article, which was authored by Keith and two other researchers. "We believe that the risks of not doing research outweigh the risks of doing it."

Bouncing solar rays back into space carries numerous environmental and geopolitical dangers, and has — until very recently — been frowned upon by the scientific community.

However, the report said geoengineering could offset temperature increases much more cheaply than actually cutting the world's greenhouse gas emissions.

Keith cautions that geoengineering should only compliment greenhouse gas reductions — not replace cuts. The article also cautions that the world's countries must work collaboratively so that no "rogue state" takes unilateral action.

"There's the beginning of serious research projects, but really just starting up — literally — right now," Keith said in an interview.

It may sound like science fiction but last year the Royal Society — the national academy of science of the U.K. and the Commonwealth — also released a report calling for large-scale intervention in the Earth's climate system.

That report said giant space mirrors may be required backups to blunt the effects of climate change if emission reductions prove to be too little too late to stop the predicted impacts of human-caused climate change.

The article in Nature noted that Keith has a commercial interest in carbon dioxide extraction technology.

Reference Sources:

February 2, 2010

STAY CONNECTEDNewsletter | RSS | Twitter | YouTube |
This site is owned and operated by 1999-2018. All Rights Reserved. All content on this site may be copied, without permission, whether reproduced digitally or in print, provided copyright, reference and source information are intact and use is strictly for not-for-profit purposes. Please review our copyright policy for full details.
volunteerDonateWrite For Us
Stay Connected With Our Newsletter