Now that it is a verifiable fact that the earth is on the brink of entering another Ice Age, let us not forget the worldwide deception of global warming whose intention was always to impose carbon and environmental tax credits and a grand illusion designed to siphon more money into those who already hold most of the world's wealth.
The body of evidence discrediting the global warming-turned -"climate change" theory (yes, it's only a theory) is growing exponentially as it smacks head-on with observational and empirical facts that undermine the entire manufactured edifice of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).
Take a look at the views of some of the experts, including a few candid assessments by die-hard True Believers, who reveal just how little evidence exists to keep alive the theoretical Global Warming Godzilla that lumbered onto the scene in the late 1980s.
First, here are a few statements from within the ranks of the global warming camp that expose the fraudulent science they themselves are disseminating:
Dr. Phil Jones -- No statistically significant warming for 15 years
From the Daily Mail: "Professor [Phil] Jones also conceded the possibility that the world was warmer in medieval times than now -- suggesting global warming may not be a man-made phenomenon . . . And he said that for the past 15 years there has been no 'statistically significant' warming."
Piers Corbyn from Weatheraction - It is complete nonsense, its fiction, it comes from a cult ideology.
From Fox News Interview: "World temperatures drive carbon dioxide levels and not the other way around," explains Corbyn. He also debunks the common assertion that global warming pseudoscientists make who claim that the reason for such weather extremes is due to global warming. "It is complete nonsense, its fiction, it comes from a cult ideology. There's no science in there and no science to back them up."
Lord Monckton - proposed carbon trading scheme
As Lord Monckton pointed out in the climate change conference in Copenhagen, the draft text of the UNFCCC proposal included talk of setting up a system of global governance to administer the proposed carbon trading scheme, but notably omitted any mention of a vote, ballot, election or any other pretence of democracy in the proposed governmental institution. With bodies like the WTO, WHO, IMF and World Bank already wielding incredible authority over the lives of people around the world, giving these bodies greater and greater power to expand their global agendas without transparency, democracy or accountability is a formula for global tyranny.
NASA GSS -- no sign of global warming in North America
From Strata-sphere.com: "In response to a freedom of
information request, NASA's GISS was required to produce a series of
emails, which in turn revealed that (a) NASA admits the current warm
period is not historically different from the period around 1921-1950, and (b) that there has been no sign of global warming in North America or the US. How is global warming possible when it is not 'global'?"
Dr. Phil Jones, Climate Research Unit
From a ClimateGate email: "With their LIA [Little Ice Age]
being 1300 -1900 and their MWP [Medieval Warm Period] 800 -1300, there
appears (at my quick first reading) no discussion of synchroneity
of the cool/warm periods. Even with the instrumental record, the early
and late 20th century warming periods are only significant locally at
between 10-20% of grid boxes."
Professor Richard Muller -- 70% of measuring stations poorly sited
Reports Ken Haapala (via
WattsUpWithThat.com): "Professor Muller presented himself as a former
skeptic [to the House National Resources Committee], but he couched his
skepticism as questioning the quality of the land-based surface
measurements . . . According to him 70% of measuring stations in the US
are poorly sited with a possible error of 2 to 5 degrees C. He evaded
the real issue: that most skeptics realize that temperatures have risen,
but question that human emissions of carbon dioxide are the principal
cause of global warming."
"Muller failed to mention that . . . he questioned the human
influence on global warming; that his calculations of temperatures show
no warming for the past ten years; that he has suggested that the cause
for the pause in warming is a change in ocean oscillations, and that
there is a disconnect between land surface data and atmospheric data."
An admission: Medieval Warm Period at least as warm as today
From Strata-sphere.com: "The real killer is the global temperature itself, which has been cooling since 2000, and not showing any warming since 1995 -- according to Dr Phil Jones, previous head of CRU.
In addition, Jones admitted there is no data to overturn the long held
scientific theory that the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was as warm or
warmer than today. Jones admits lack of data in other regions was used
by Mann and others to make up the idea the MWP was cooler, but lack of
data is not the same thing as proxies showing cooler temps!"
NASA GISS -- 10 warmest years spread throughout last century
From Strata-sphere.com: "In fact, NASA GISS is on record noting that the ten warmest years are spread throughout the last century and
are all statistically tied for warmest year. Because of the margin of
error in global indexes, there is no way to determine which of the
following years are warmer than the others.
"For the earlier period these are the warmest years in the top ten:
1921, 1931, 1934, 1938, 1939 -- 5 all told. For the latter it
is: 1990, 1998, 1999, 2006 -- which is 4. And then there is the outlier
1953. These all have a temperature index that is statistically the same --
and it proves there is not 'significant' warming, which blows the AGW
theory right out of the water."
While consensus scientists are stuck in defense
mode, credentialed and respected skeptics around the
globe have taken no time out in their efforts to expose the soft
underbelly of the alarmist scientific data churned out
by manipulated climate models.
Professor Terry Mills -- Warming just as likely to be caused by random fluctuations
From the Herald Sun in Australia:
"Terry Mills, professor of applied statistics and econometrics at
Loughborough University, looked at the same data as the IPCC. He found
that the warming trend it reported over the past 30 years or so was just
as likely to be due to random fluctuations as to the impacts of
greenhouse gases. Mill's findings are to be published in Climatic
Change, an environmental journal."
John Christy, professor, UAH -- Land temperature records unreliable
"The temperature records cannot be relied on as indicators of global
change," said John Christy, professor of atmospheric science at the
University of Alabama in Huntsville, a former lead author on the
From the Herald Sun:
"The doubts of Christy and a number of other researchers focus on the
thousands of weather stations around the world, which have been used to
collect temperature data over the past 150 years. These stations, they
believe, have been seriously compromised by factors such as
urbanisation, changes in land use and, in many cases, being moved from
site to site . . . ."
Joe D'Aleo and Dr. Don Easterbrook -- No link between CO2 and temperature changes
"During the past century, global climates have consisted of two cool
periods (1880-1915 and 1945 to 1977) and two warm periods (1915 to 1945
and 1977 to 1998). In 1977, the PDO [Pacific Decadal Oscillation]
switched abruptly from its cool mode, where it had been since about
1945, into its warm mode and global climate shifted from cool to warm.
"This rapid switch from cool to warm has become known as "The Great
Pacific Climatic Shift" (Figure 1). Atmospheric CO2 showed no unusual
changes across this sudden climate shift and was clearly not responsible
for it. Similarly, the global warming from ~1915 to ~1945 could not
have been caused by increased atmospheric CO2 because that time preceded
the rapid rise of CO2, and when CO2 began to increase rapidly after
1945, 30 years of global cooling occurred (1945-1977)."
Only one global warming period in 500 years matches rising CO2
"Only one out of all of the global warming periods in the past 500
years occurred at the same time as rising CO2 (1977--1998). About 96% of
the warm periods in the past 500 years could not possibly have been
caused by rise of CO2. The inescapable conclusion of this is that CO2 is
not the cause of global warming.
Two ocean oscillations drive climate shifts
"The PDO leads the way [in climate shifts] and its effect is later
amplified by the AMO [Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation). Each time
this has occurred in the past century, global temperatures have remained
cool for about 30 years. Thus, the current sea surface temperatures not
only explain why we have had global cooling for the past 10 years, but
also assure that cool temperatures will continue for several more
"The cool phase of the PDO is now entrenched and 'global warming' (the term used for warming from 1977 to 1998) is over."
Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov, Pulkovo Observatory -- Warns of deep temperature drop
"The earth is no longer threatened by the catastrophic global warming
forecast by some scientists; warming passed its peak in 1998 - 2005,
while the value of the TSI by July-September of last year had already
declined by 0.47 watts per square meter," Abdussamatov wrote.
"Consequently, we should fear a deep temperature drop, but not
catastrophic global warming. Humanity must survive the serious economic,
social, demographic and political consequences of a global temperature
drop, which will directly affect the national interests of almost all
countries and more than 80% of the population of the Earth."
Dr. George Kukla -- Changes in orbit responsible for climate change
From Climate Realists.com and Helium.com:
"George Kukla, 77, retired professor of paleoclimatology at Columbia
University and researcher at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
responds, "The only thing to worry about global warming is the damage
that can be done by worrying. Why are some scientists worried? Perhaps
because they feel that to stop worrying may mean to stop being paid."
"I feel we're on pretty solid ground in interpreting orbit
around the sun as the primary driving force behind Ice Age glaciation,"
he says. "The relationship is just too clear and consistent to allow
reasonable doubt. It's either that, or climate drives orbit, and that
just doesn't make sense."
Earth on the brink of an Ice Age?
Pravda Science Report, via IceAgeNow:
"The AGW theory is based on data that is drawn from a ridiculously
narrow span of time and it demonstrates a wanton disregard for the 'big
picture' of long-term climate change. The data from paleoclimatology,
including ice cores, sea sediments, geology, paleobotany and zoology,
indicate that we are on the verge of entering another Ice Age, and the
data also shows that severe and lasting climate change can occur within
only a few years.
"While concern over the dubious threat of Anthropogenic Global
Warming continues to distract the attention of people throughout the
world, the very real threat of the approaching and inevitable Ice Age,
which will render large parts of the Northern Hemisphere uninhabitable,
is being foolishly ignored."
Michael Crichton -- There is no human-caused global warming
In his book, "State of Fear," Michael Crichton offers his assessment
of the scientific evidence for global warming. His conclusion: There is no human-caused global warming.
Crichton is correct, writes Donald Miller: "Most of the rise in temperature in the 20th century occurred before 1940, before CO2 levels started rising. Temperatures fell 0.3degrees F from 1940 to 1970 while CO2 levels rose, from 310 to 325 ppmv . . . ."
"The temperature of the planet's upper atmosphere (which the theory
of global warming predicts should warm first), as measured by
satellites, beginning in 1979, and weather balloons, has remained
unchanged over the last 25 years despite a rise in atmospheric CO2
levels to 370 ppmv [now near 390 ppm]."
Judi McLeod's article in Canada Free Press
Judi McLeod's excellent article for Canada Free Press, which she expanded from a Fox News piece, highlights how years before he became president, Obama helped directly fund a carbon trading exchange that will likely play a critical role in the proposed cap-and-trade carbon reduction program. The Global Warming Hoax Continues: Top 12 Misconceptions About Climate Change
Weather Channel founder says global warming science is rigged
Writes Weather Channel founder John Coleman:
"Any person who spends a decade at a university obtaining a PHD in
Meteorology and becomes a research scientist, more likely than not,
becomes a part of that single minded culture . . . These scientists know
that if they do research and results are in no way alarming, their
research will gather dust on the shelf and their research careers will
"But if they do research that sounds alarms, they will become well
known and respected and receive scholarly awards and, very importantly,
more research dollars will come flooding their way. . . It was easy for
them to manipulate the data to come up with the results they wanted to
make headlines and at the same time drive their environmental agendas."
"The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. It is all a scam, the result of bad science."
Temperatures rose four times as fast in 18th century
From David Archibald:
"After the invention of thermometers, records started to be kept . . . A
number of interesting things can be seen in this record, including the
depths of the Little Ice Age in the late 17th century when the Thames
regularly froze over, and the Dalton Minimum which was the last time the
Thames froze over in the City of London."
"What is also interesting is the 2.2degrees temperature rise from 7.8degrees in
1696 to 10.0degrees in 1732. This is a 2.2degrees rise is 36 years. By comparison,
the world has seen a 0.6degrees rise over the 100 years of the 20th century.
That temperature rise in the early 18th century was four times as large
and three times as fast as the rise in the 20th century."
* * *
These represent only small fraction of the many facts that
rip away at the theological underpinnings of the global warming gospel.
Awaiting any inquisitive person is a virtual Mother Lode of informed
analysis and scientific data, available at the touch of a keyboard,
impeaching the tenets of the AGW doctrine and challenging the certitude
of the True Disciples -- formerly practicing scientists -- who are
now engaged in a desperate effort to defend and preserve their
University of Maryland physics professor Robert Parks gets to the heart of the matter:
"In science, refuting an accepted belief is celebrated as an advance in knowledge; in religion it is condemned as heresay."