Planned Parenthood: 90 Years of Malicious Advocacy In The Guise of Health and Safety
We are living in a delusional society where organizations that promote health damaging vaccines, cancer causing birth control, invasive mammograms and radiation screening are supported and actually praised by our governments and the population at large. Welcome to the world of Planned Parenthood, where the most dramatic irony comes from the fact that all of these services are offered in the guise of the "nation's leading sexual and reproductive health care" whose intention is always health and safety.
"The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)
Who is Planned Parenthood (PP)?
One of the broad misconceptions across those who blindly follow the advice of PP, is that they are a trusted health care provider and passionate educator who can only serve women in their highest interests when it comes to matters of health, whether sexual or reproductive.
Unfortunately, the harsh reality is that PP could never be trusted or serve women in their highest interests because their founding policies (which still exist today) are based on racism and eugenics. Consequently, although the intentions of many of their providers may be positive and sincere, the resulting advice and treatments based on mainstream medical non-wisdom inevitably leads to disease and infertility.
Although this comes to no surprise to those who have studied the history of PP and the founder Margaret Sanger's intentions, this percentage of people is very small, especially among the many proponents who endorse PP's protocols.
The video below by the American Life League exposes Sanger's racist plan to create a "master race."
Another excellent video is one of by Maafa21 on black genocide highlighting eugenics, elitism, and well-hidden racial agendas of which Margaret Sanger was a very strong advocate.
You don't have to dig deep in some dungeon of archives to find out what the origin of PP intended for its clients. In fact, if we go right to Sanger herself in her own words, we find a very disturbed individual.
On blacks, immigrants and indigents: "...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial purification: Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial "purification," couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.
On the right of married couples to bear children: Couples should be required to submit applications to have a child, she wrote in her "Plan for Peace." Birth Control Review, April 1932
On the purpose of birth control: The purpose in promoting birth control was "to create a race of thoroughbreds," she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2) On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities: "More children from the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
On the extermination of blacks: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population," she said, "if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon
On respecting the rights of the mentally ill: In her "Plan for Peace," Sanger outlined her strategy for eradication of those she deemed "feebleminded." Among the steps included in her evil scheme were immigration restrictions; compulsory sterilization; segregation to a lifetime of farm work; etc. Birth Control Review, April 1932, p. 107
These are just some of many statements Sanger has been quoted on until the day she died. Despite her vocal and public intentions, she was labeled as an American sex educator and birth control activist. This is the equivalent of referring to the last few US Presidents as peace educators and ambassadors.
Sanger's efforts eventually contributed to supreme court rulings which ultimately legalized chemically induced forms of contraception in the United States. First Do Harm: Birth Control, Vaccines and Mammograms
There are debates far and wide throughout the internet regarding PP and their chief purpose, however most supporters appear to be highly misinformed and uneducated not only about the history of PP, but about current treatments they advise to this very day. Namely PP's utter disregard to the established scientific data which shows that birth control, vaccines and mammograms (the trio of PP's stamp of approval), cause a wide range of diseases.
The conventional medical opinion is that birth control is one of the most important hallmarks of an advanced society. Those well-versed in natural health including many scientists know that it is also the hallmark of disease that only leads to lasting and damaging long-term health effects.
There are many contradicting studies on the relationship between birth control and cancer. Much of this can be attributed to the high rate of data falsification among scientific studies controlled by pharmaceutical interests that don't want the public to know the truth about how and why oral contraceptives cause cancer. Many scientific publications such as the British Medical Journal have revealed that data falsification among scientists is disturbingly widespread. Inappropriately adjusting, excluding, altering, or fabricating data is commonplace among scientists who serve their drug industry masters and those who conduct studies on oral contraception also fall prey to dollar signs. Thankfully, there is an abundance of studies that do provide substantial evidence that birth control causes cancer.
Regardless of any position whether pro-life or pro-choice and based on just the few studies (of many) above, surely even those who are strongly in favour of contraception can appreciate and accept that there are real and potential health dangers in subscribing to any type of oral contraception. As many health experts have often stated, if you alter hormones at any age with the introduction of artificial chemicals, you will eventually experience long-lasting detrimental health effects.
The recent Komen controversy has the media buzzing about a reversal of policy over its decision to cut funding to PP and mammogram screening procedures. The real issue for women's health is not about funding but about the deadly effects from radiation spewing from mammogram screening devices.
Routine mammograms are far less effective at preventing breast cancer deaths and far more expected to cause unnecessary procedures, over-treatment and ultimately accelerate death more than any other screening method on women.
A routine mammogram screening typically involves four x-rays, two per breast. This amounts to more than 150 times the amount of radiation that is used for a single chest x-ray. Bottom line: screening mammograms send a strong dose of ionizing radiation through your tissues. Any dose of ionizing radiation is capable of contributing to cancer and heart disease.
Screening mammograms increase the risk of developing cancer in premenopausal women.
Screening mammograms require breast tissue to be squeezed firmly between two plates. This compressive force can damage small blood vessels which can result in existing cancerous cells spreading to other areas of the body.
Cancers that exist in pre-menopausal women with dense breast tissue and in postmenopausal women on estrogen replacement therapy are commonly undetected by screening mammograms.
For women who have a family history of breast cancer and early onset of menstruation, the risk of being diagnosed with breast cancer with screening mammograms when no cancer actually exists can be as high as 100 percent.
In 1974, while mammography was in its infancy, the National Cancer Institute was warned by Professor Malcolm C. Pike at the University of Southern California School of Medicine that a number of specialists had concluded that "giving a women under age 50 a mammogram on a routine basis was close to unethical". This warning was ignored.
Also in the 1970's, the Director of Biostatistics at Rosewell Park Memorial Institute for Cancer Research, Dr. Irwin Bross, headed a study involving data from 16 million people. This ground breaking study found that the main cause of the rising rates of leukemia was medical radiation in the form of diagnostic medical X-rays. Applying his findings to the breast cancer screening program, Dr. Bross later elaborated that "women should have been given the information about the hazards of radiation at the same time they were given the sales talk for mammography."
One of the largest mammogram studies ever initiated had to be cancelled because the mammogram group of women developed more cancer than the non-mammogram control group. This study is dismissed now because it was done in the early 70's and radiology has greatly progressed since then [they say].
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force's panel in late 2010 recommended against routine screening for women in their 40s. Thousands of scientists and medical professionals are unconvinced from conclusions of the new study and maintain that extreme caution is necessary before recommending a mammogram at any age.
If mammograms result in unnecessary procedures and over-treatment of what are actually harmless cancers that would go away by themselves, what is not being clearly stated is how many women die from or are seriously harmed by complications from biopsies and chemotherapy. Every surgical procedure carries risk, and women are being regularly subjected to those risks unnecessarily because of faulty (yet very profitable) tests. Cancer treatment is of course known to carry very real risk, including a non-significant risk of death from the treatment, yet women are being unnecessarily subjected to that too (also very profitable).
If mammograms are both useless and dangerous, why then does the medical community continue to use it and other "heroic" cancer practices? The answer as to why they behave so caustically toward patients has been given many times in the history of medicine with the only difference now being that they have legally suppressed a citizen's right to choice in health care.
Perhaps one of the most embarrassing components on PP's arsenal of ineffective medical treatments is the HPV vaccine. PP's endorsement of the medical establishment's attempt to vaccinate young girls for a disease which could never be prevented through vaccination should at the very least be criminal. In fact, Gardasil, Silgard and Cervarix may turn out to be the biggest medical hoax of the century.
A recent publication in the Annals of Medicine has exposed the fraudulent nature of Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines. Key messages the researchers reported include a lack of evidence for any HPV vaccines in preventing cervical cancer and lack of evaluation of health risks.
Despite what is now a plethora of scientific evidence showing that Gardasil and HPV vaccinations are unproven, unjustified and lacking evidence-based medicine, the CDC has broadened their recommendations to include young boys.
Planned Parenthood is a legitimate embarrassment to women's health not only in the United States but around the world. We must strive to move past the uninformed and uneducated teachings of organizations such as PP who rely on policies based on conventional medical approaches designed to harm more than they help.
If we continue to allow such misinformed practitioners to promote health damaging treatment protocols, then future generations are most definitely going to suffer the consequences including cancer, infertility, and a wide range of other chronic illnesses. It's time to speak out against Planned Parenthood and any other advocates of health policies who are premptively and progressively destroying the health and future of our children.
Marco Torres is a research specialist, writer and consumer advocate for healthy lifestyles. He holds degrees in Public Health and Environmental Science and is a professional speaker on topics such as disease prevention, environmental toxins and health policy.