Top Health Tools
Top Health Tools
Top Reports
Top Reports
Top Articles
Top Articles
Top Reviews
Top Reviews
   
 

Share/Bookmark
...............................................................................................................

June 24, 2013 by APRIL McCARTHY
Cruel and Unnecessary Animal Tests Carried Out By The World's Leading Food Giants


The British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) has recently released findings of research showing cruel and unnecessary animal tests carried out by some of the world's leading food giants including, Yakult, Danone, Nestle and Unilever.



Animal experiments have been carried out in an attempt to identify the ‘health benefits’ of certain foods to feed the growing infatuation with ‘super foods’. Companies have become increasingly interested in assessing whether foods are ‘good for you’ and want to be able to make claims about their products and exploit the discovery of a so-called ‘health benefit’. The animals subjected to the experiments we uncovered included mice, rats, rabbits and pigs. The research is recent, having been published in the past two years. The experiments can involve artificially inducing the signs of a disease or illness in the animals. This involves genetically engineering animals to possess human genes or injecting them with chemicals or infectious bacteria. Not only do animals suffer the painful effects of conditions such as colitis and stomach injury but such animal ‘models’ are poor representations of complex and long-running human conditions.

Examples include:

- To investigate products containing Hoodia gordonii, a spiny African shrub (which is already used as a weight management supplement for the treatment of obesity), rabbits and mice were subjected to a reproductive toxicity test. Pregnant rabbits and mice were force fed extracts of the plant throughout their pregnancy for 25 days. The day before the animals were due to give birth, they and their unborn foetuses were killed and examined. (Unilever)

- In order to determine if consuming Yakult’s probiotic yoghurt drink can protect humans from stomach injury, rats were starved for 20 hours and then force-fed a single dose of probiotic bacteria, through a stainless steel tube inserted down their throats into their stomachs. Two hours later, their stomachs were damaged when they were force fed a solution containing hydrochloric acid. The animals were left to suffer for one hour before they were killed so that their stomachs could be dissected and examined. (Yakult)

- To explore the anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties of Goji berries (also called wolfberries), mice were fed a new preparation created by Nestle called Lacto-Wolfberry, (a water-dispersible powder containing 50% wolfberry and 25% skimmed milk). After seven days of feeding, the mice were given an injection of a chemical irritant directly into their rectums to cause colon disease. Due to the resulting abdominal pain, the mice stopped eating and had to be force-fed the Lacto-Wolfberry for the next five days. The animals were then killed and their colons dissected. (Nestle)

- In an attempt to prove that the consumption of a new multi-nutrient drink created by Danone (FortasynTM Connect) can reduce the risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, three-month old mice, who had been genetically modified to develop certain characteristics of Alzheimer’s, were fed the drink for three months. Some of the mice died for unknown reasons during the experiment. At the end of the study, the animals were killed and their brains dissected and analysed for signs of improvement. (Danone)

Spokesperson for Nestle, Hilary Green stated that they only use animals in tests on medical foods or when new ingredients required safety data for regulatory approval.

This type of research is not only cruel but also unnecessary as many of the health benefits of food and probiotics are already known from existing human data. Since these foods are already being consumed by consumers it is entirely possible to use human trials to assess the positive effects on skin, obesity, stomach problems and colitis.

The BUAV Head of Science Dr Katy Taylor stated:

Much of the testing was unnecessary as human data already existed for the indications in question or could be gathered.

"The motivation to do this for most companies is financial -- it is cheaper and less hassle to conduct animal trials," Dr Taylor said.

She refuted Nestle's assertion that animal testing was only conducted for medical foods.

"There is a thin line between medical and regular foods anyway -- Nestlé was testing goji berries - that is a regular food isn't it?" she wondered.

Dr Taylor said its report was only a snapshot of animal testing activity in the food sector that was dwarfed in testing by others. "There are a lot of failed studies that never see the light of day. But food industry testing is a small sector of testing and not on the same scale as pharma or university."

'The public will be shocked to learn that these well-known and familiar high street brands are involved in sickening experiments on animals. It is unacceptable that animals should be made to suffer by companies in an effort to make 'health benefit' claims about their products. The BUAV is calling on all food giants to immediately stop experimenting on animals to test food products and ingredients by switching to humane alternatives or using existing data."

Sources:
buav.org
foodnavigator.com

April McCarthy is a community journalist playing an active role reporting and analyzing world events to advance our health and eco-friendly initiatives.


This site is owned and operated by PreventDisease.com © 1999-2017. All Rights Reserved. All content on this site may be copied, without permission, whether reproduced digitally or in print, provided copyright, reference and source information are intact and use is strictly for not-for-profit purposes. Please review our copyright policy for full details.
aaa
Interact
volunteerDonateWrite For Us
Stay Connected With Our Newsletter