Measles Outbreak Blamed On Two Unvaccinated Children Despite 90 Percent of The Infected Being Vaccinated
The mainstream media continues to a dig deeper hole for themselves, eroding their credibility to unimaginable levels after what can only be described as one of the most ludicrous attempts to cast blame on unvaccinated children for infections in the vaccinated. Several reports on a measles outbreak in New York City are accusing two children who were unvaccinated for the infections in 18 other vaccinated children. It's the new infectious rate logic that only vaccinate advocates can comprehend.
One report out of csnphilly.com titled "No Vaccinations Fueling Measles?" stated that "according to the New York State Department of Health, two of 20 people infected in a recent measles outbreak in New York City were children who had not been vaccinated by their parent's choice."
So despite 18 out of 20 (90%) of children being vaccinated, somehow this outbreak has been caused by the two children who were not vaccinated??? Now please inform me again on vaccine pseudoscience and correct me if I am misrepresenting the claims, but according to the wisdom of infectious disease officials, are the vaccines not supposed to protect the vaccinated from the unvaccinated? If so, how could 90% of the vaccinated children contract measles from the unvaccinated?
Also, notice the criticism directed at parents of unvaccinated children by the author. The last sentence "children who had not been vaccinated by their parent's choice" is simply additional neurolingusitic programming that the mainstream media uses in an attempt to further manipulate and convince the public that parents who choose not vaccinate their children are somehow to blame for these outbreaks.
Another convenient paragraph appearing in both the csnphilly.com and nbc10.com articles is a comment by pediatrician Dr. Jarret Patton. He stated that parents who refuse to vaccinate their children often make their decision based on fear and misinformation. This is the most common approach used by vaccine officials who wish to attack the anti-vaccine community through insults and patronizing comments which only serve as a part of the continuing model of propagating fear and anger.
More Educated Parents Less Likely To Vaccinate
Of course, the reality is that more educated parents are less likely to vaccinate. Parents who don't vaccinate their children have done far more research and reading than most people who simply follow their doctor's orders which takes little more than obedience and blind faith. In fact the largest majority of parents who awaken to the dangers of vaccination have completed years of research through diligent investigation, while eventually coming to the conclusion that vaccines are a far greater risk to children than a benefit.
Fear and Misinformation Drive The Entire Vaccination Platform
The fear and misinformation is unfortunately much more prevalent in those advocating vaccines than those who are not. It is those who vaccinate their children who are terrified and fearful of those who don't. It is
government officials who force vaccine mandates in schools and the workplace out of fear. It is the media who promotes this fear and pits vaccine advocates against the anti-vaccine community at every opportunity as evident in the articles above. Most parents of unvaccinated children have no fear of disease because the majority understand natural health and are well-versed on disease prevention rather than promotion.
Vaccination would never have been possible without fear. Fear is what drives the entire industry. There was a piece published by the New York Times recently written by Dr. Kristen Feemster (a pediatric infectious disease physician who profits from “professionally advising” pharmaceutical companies and feels that a parent’s decision not to vaccinate may warrant a call to Child Protective Services) that urged the scientific and public health communities to curtail vaccine exemptions. So basically do away with a parent's choice to not vaccinate for medical, religious, and sometimes philosophical reasons. The reason for trumping these rights? The public good of course.
Recently new parents in Alabama claim that a doctor blackmailed them with calling Child Protective Services, after they refused to vaccinate their baby, and when they believed they were faced with no other option, they finally gave into the doctor’s demands. These are the type of incidents that happen all over the country every day in the honour of vaccination protocols which rely on fear tactics on unsuspecting parents.
"Over a century of myths have allowed drugs and vaccines to transcend logic in health care and persuade the masses in disease care. These beliefs have allowed a complacency in opinion to outweigh any critical thinking that opposes these myths, and consequently any discomfort in the process." ~ Dr. Dave Mihalovic
The real problem on the misinformation front is that there has been so many lies throughout the decades that people have a hard time distinguishing facts from fiction. Only now are the facts coming forward on what really happened in the last 200 years and why some diseases were controlled (none were eradicated).
The reason we no longer have the frequency of some of the terrible diseases that happened in the last several centuries is due to improved living conditions, sanitation and nutrition. Once again this comes down to separating the propaganda by mainstream medicine from reality. Vaccines have never prevented and will never prevent disease...only act as a vehicle to propagate disease. Every time a vaccine was circulated and introduced into populations, the disease they claimed to be vaccinating against was already declining. The scientific community then took it upon themselves to publish falsities on the effectiveness of vaccines taking credit for improvements that society made as a whole. In fact, many vaccines such as small pox were killing far more people than they were saving. See the following articles for more details on this:
The facts can never be admitted. If they were, the vaccination game would be over very quickly. Keeping people in the blind is much more effective for confidence and business. There are now countless numbers of children who are contracting the very diseases they are being vaccinated against. The situation is so alarming that on every outbreak the media immediately goes attack to find the nearest unvaccinated child to blame for the outbreak...just like clock work.
Dr. Russell Blaylock, MD has written and spoken extensively on how vaccines harm child brain development. He also explains why herd immunity is such a myth. In the original description of herd immunity, the protection to the population at large occurred only if people contracted the infections naturally. The reason for this is that naturally-acquired immunity lasts for a lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity. But, there was one major problem -- vaccine-induced immunity lasted for only a relatively short period and this applies only to humoral immunity. This is why they began, silently, to suggest boosters for most vaccines, even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox, measles, mumps, and rubella.
Then they discovered an even greater problem, the boosters were lasting for only 2 years or less. This is why we are now seeing mandates that youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines, even those which they insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as the MMR. The same is being suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically, no one in the media or medical field is asking what is going on. They just accept that it must be done.
That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven quite simply. It was not until recently that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers, have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence, at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.
If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.
When we examine the scientific literature, we find that for many of the vaccines protective immunity was 30 to 40%, meaning that 70% to 60% of the public has been without vaccine protection. Again, this would mean that with a 30% to 40% vaccine-effectiveness rate combined with the fact that most people lost their immune protection within 2 to 10 year of being vaccinated, most of us were without the magical 95% number needed for herd immunity. This is why vaccine defenders insist the vaccines have 95% effectiveness rates.
Without the mantra of herd immunity, these public-health officials would not be able to justify forced mass vaccinations. The entire case for forced mass vaccination rest upon this myth and it is important that we demonstrate the falsity of this idea.