Mouthwash is no substitute for dental
floss, a federal judge ruled, calling a Listerine ad campaign
false and misleading and a public health risk.
Judge Denny Chin said in a
written ruling made public Friday that he expected to order
Pfizer Inc. as early as Monday to stop claiming that its product,
Listerine, is as effective as floss at reducing plaque and
gingivitis between teeth.
The ruling came after McNeil-PPC
Inc., a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, filed a lawsuit
saying that false claims in the advertising campaign that
began last June posed an unfair threat against its sales of
dental floss.
"Dentists and hygienists have
been telling their patients for decades to floss daily," Chin
wrote. "They have been doing so for good reason. The benefits
of flossing are real they are not a `myth.' Pfizer's
implicit message that Listerine can replace floss is false
and misleading."
Pfizer in print ads had featured
a Listerine bottle balanced on a scale opposite a floss container.
The ad said: "Listerine antiseptic is clinically proven to
be as effective as floss at reducing plaque and gingivitis
between the teeth."
The campaign also featured
a television commercial titled the "Big Bang." In it, the
commercial announces that Listerine is as effective as floss
and that clinical tests prove it, though it does add that
there is no replacement for flossing.
The judge said "substantial
evidence" demonstrates that flossing is important in reducing
tooth decay and gum disease and that it cannot be replaced
by rinsing with a mouthwash.
The judge also noted that the
authors of articles on which Pfizer based its advertising
campaign had emphasized that dental professionals should continue
to recommend daily flossing and cautioned that they were not
suggesting that mouth rinse be used instead of floss.
Chin said Pfizer based its
findings on two flawed studies of people with mild to moderate
gingivitis who did not use floss properly. The studies, he
added, proved only that Listerine is "as effective as improperly
used floss."
Gingivitis, which affects some
two-thirds of the U.S. population, causes inflamed, swollen
and sometimes bleeding gums. It can precede periodontitis,
a less common inflammation that develops in deeper tissues
and sometimes leads to tooth loss.
The judge noted that 87 percent
of consumers floss either infrequently or not at all, despite
frequent warnings from dentists and dental hygienists to do
so.
The judge said Pfizer had received
complaints about its advertising, including one from a dental
professional who said he was "aghast" to hear of the company's
claims and another who said the claims "can set back years
of progress by the ethical dental profession in convincing
patients that flossing is essential for their oral health."
Chin wrote that flossing provides
benefits that Listerine does not, including the ability to
remove plaque below the gumline and to dislodge pieces of
food trapped between teeth.
The judge said he found it
"highly troubling" that Pfizer took the position in the lawsuit
that floss can be replaced by Listerine even though it had
told dental professionals for two years that it was not suggesting
that was the case.
Messages left with Pfizer were
not immediately returned. Danielle Devine, a Johnson &
Johnson spokeswoman, said the company was pleased with the
ruling.
More
on Flossing
Reference
Source 102
January 10, 2005