 |
|
Man-made Chemicals
Detected In Newborns
An analysis of nearly 300 umbilical cord blood
samples led by researchers at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School
of Public Health shows that newborn babies are exposed to perfluorooctane
sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) while in the womb.
PFOS and PFOA are polyfluoroalkyl compounds (PFCs)—ubiquitous
man-made chemicals used in a variety of consumer products, including
as a protective coating on food-contact packaging, textiles and
carpets, and in the manufacturing of insecticides. The health
impact from exposure to these compounds is not fully known, but
previous studies found these compounds could cause tumors and
developmental toxicity in laboratory animals at doses much higher
than those observed in the Hopkins study.
The analysis conducted in Baltimore, Md., detected PFOS in 99 percent
of the infant samples examined and PFOA in 100 percent of those
examined. The results are published in the April 20, 2007, online
edition of the journal Environmental Science & Technology. Some
of the study’s findings were previously reported at the Society
of Toxicology workshop held in February and at the International
Conference on Environmental Epidemiology and Exposure held last
September.
“When we began this research we weren’t sure what
we would find, because previously there was very little information
about fetal exposure to PFOS and PFOA. Even though these
chemicals are not bioaccumulative in fat, they are very persistent,
which probably accounts for their presence in nearly every newborn,”
said Benjamin Apelberg, PhD, lead author of the study and a research
associate in the Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Department
of Epidemiology. Apelberg conducted this work as part of his doctoral
research.
The researchers analyzed cord serum from 299 newborns delivered
at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore between 2004 and 2005.
The samples were tested for the presence of PFOS and PFOA and
eight other polyfluoroalkyl compounds. PFOA was detected in all
of the samples and PFOS in all but two of the samples. The concentrations
for both compounds were lower than those typically detected in
adults in the United States and lower than those known to cause
tumors and developmental problems in laboratory animals; more
study is needed to understand health effects at these lower exposure
levels.
PFOS concentrations were slightly higher in Black and Asian infants
compared to White infants, but no correlation was found between
concentrations and the mother’s socioeconomic status, age,
education, marital status or whether she lived within the city
limits or not. In addition, the researchers found a strong correlation
between concentrations of PFOS and PFOA even though the compounds
come from different industrial sources. The finding suggests that
humans may be exposed to both chemicals in a similar manner.
“This study confirms that, as we might have suspected,
exposure to PFOS and PFOA is fairly universal; this is of particular
concern because of the potential toxicity, especially developmental
toxicity, for these chemicals and the lack of information about
health risks at these exposure levels. What was surprising
is how strongly they are associated with each other, given that
they have very different uses. We will need additional research
to understand how exposures are occurring in this region,”
said Lynn Goldman, MD, co-author of the study and a professor
in the Department of Environmental Health Sciences at the Bloomberg
School of Public Health.
Addition study authors include Antonia M. Calafat, Julie B. Herbstman,
Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik, Jochen Heidler, Larry Needham, Rolf U. Halden
and Frank Witter. Heidler and Halden are with the Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health. Herbstman, formerly a doctoral
student in epidemiology at the JHSPH is now at the Columbia Mailman
School of Public Health and Witter is with the Johns Hopkins School
of Medicine. Calafat, Kuklenyik and Needham are with the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention.
The research was supported by funding from the Johns Hopkins
Bloomberg School of Public Health’s Maryland Mothers and
Babies Study, the Cigarette Restitution Fund, Johns Hopkins Medical
Institutions, Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future and the
Heinz Foundation.
For more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick
Prevention Resources".
|
|
 |