High Milk Intake May
Boost Ovarian Cancer Risk
High intakes of whole milk and lactose might be associated with
an increased risk of ovarian cancer, suggests a review of 21 published
studies.
However, since the association was a weak one, the new report
is no reason to stop drinking milk in moderation, the researchers
note.
This new meta-analysis appears in the Aug. 5 online issue of
the International Journal of Cancer.
"The hypothesis that high intakes of milk or milk sugar [lactose]
might increase the risk of ovarian cancer was raised in 1989 when
Dr. [David] Cramer reported that countries in which milk consumption
was high had a higher occurrence of ovarian cancer," explained
study author Susanna Larsson, a researcher at the Karolinska Institute
in Stockholm, Sweden. "Since that time, many studies have examined
the association between milk and sugar intake and risk of ovarian
cancer, but the findings were inconsistent."
But three large, well-designed studies in which dietary intake
was assessed among cancer-free women who were followed up over
time to see who developed ovarian cancer showed an increased risk
of ovarian cancer among women with high intakes of milk and lactose,
Larsson noted.
If women took in a daily increase of 10 grams of lactose, about
the amount in one glass of milk, their risk of ovarian cancer
increased by 13 percent, Larsson found.
In the 18 case-control studies, in which those who had ovarian
cancer were compared with healthy controls, no evidence of an
association between dairy food and lactose intake and ovarian
cancer was found, except for whole milk. Those in the highest
whole milk consumption group had a 27 percent higher risk of ovarian
cancer.
But low-fat milk consumption was negatively associated with ovarian
cancer in the case-control studies, she found.
Exactly how the dairy foods may boost risk isn't known, but lactose
produces galactose and glucose, and galactose has been thought
to increase the risk by direct toxicity to the ovarian germ cells.
But the bottom line is that "it is still uncertain whether the
potential increased risk of ovarian cancer associated with high
milk/milk sugar intake is similar for all women, or if the risk
is restricted to some women who are genetically susceptible to
milk," according to Larsson.
"Although milk consumption may increase the risk of ovarian cancer,
this cancer is relatively uncommon," Larsson added. "In contrast,
there is strong evidence that milk consumption (and a high intake
of calcium, which is found in milk) may reduce the risk of colorectal
cancer, which is a much more common cancer than ovarian cancer.
Consumption of low-fat milk might also lower the risk for other
diseases, such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease."
This year, about 22,220 new cases of ovarian cancer will be diagnosed
in the United States, according to the American
Cancer Society, and about 16,000 women will die from the
disease.
Larsson is not recommending women stop drinking milk. "However,
in the future when we know more about possible interactions between
milk consumption and genetic susceptibility, it might be that
some women should not drink milk because of a high risk of developing
ovarian cancer."
Another expert, Dr. Jonathan Berek, executive vice chairman and
a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of
California, Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, agreed
women should not stop drinking milk but should practice moderation.
He said that although the association between milk drinking and
ovarian cancer has been made, "it's a weak positive epidemiological
factor."
Even if it proves to be true, it does not play as strong a role
as other factors -- such as the use of oral contraceptives --
do, he added.
"We know that women who take the birth control pill for at least
five years cut their risk [of ovarian cancer] in half. If you
take the birth control pill and also have a couple of kids your
risk may be as low as one-third that of the general population,"
Berek said.
"I don't think you can prove [the link] using these kinds of
studies," Berek noted. "What is needed are more refined molecular
genetic studies."
Reference
Source 101
August
5, 2005
For
more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick
Prevention Resources".
|