Health
Headlines
Get
the latest news in prevention and health matters. This
feature includes daily postings and recent archives to
keep you up to date on health reports and wires around
the world.
Weekly
Wellness
Get
informed with weekly wellness facts in a diversity of
health topics from prevention to fitness and nutrition.
Tips
Great
tips on what you need to know about keeping healthy and
active all year round.
Link Between Graffiti And Obesity
British researchers think there's a link between graffiti and
obesity.
People who live in city areas with little green space, lots of
graffiti and litter are more likely to be obese, compared with
people living in city areas with lots of greenery, the researchers
claim in a new report.
"People who live in more pleasant and attractive environments,
which in our study was assessed by levels of greenery, are much
more likely to be physically active and not to be overweight or
obese," said study author Anne Ellaway, a senior science officer
in the Medical Research Council's Social and Public Health Sciences
Unit at the University of Glasgow, Scotland.
"Conversely, in less attractive areas, those with lots of graffiti,
litter and dog mess, people are more likely to be overweight or
obese and to take less exercise," she added.
Their report appears in the Aug. 18 online issue of the British
Medical Journal.
In their study, Ellaway's team analyzed data from a large housing
and health survey conducted in eight European cities in 2002 and
2003. Using questionnaires, the researchers collected data on
the height and weight of nearly 7,000 people, which they then
used to calculate body weight and levels of physical activity.
The researchers then looked at the residential environment, including
the amount of graffiti, litter and dog mess, as well as levels
of vegetation and greenery.
Ellaway's team found that people surrounded by high levels of
greenery were more than three times more likely to be physical
active, and 40 percent less likely to be overweight or obese compared
with people in other environments.
Specifically, people who lived in environments that had high
levels of graffiti, litter and other neighborhood mess were 50
percent less physically active and 50 percent more likely to be
overweight or obese.
Given these findings, Ellaway believes that "more effort needs
to be directed to upgrading the local environment in rundown areas
to encourage people to go out more and be physically active."
One expert said the study doesn't answer which comes first --
healthy living or clean, green environments.
"The design of this study precludes conclusions about causality,"
said Dr. David L. Katz, director of the Prevention Research Center
at Yale University School of Medicine. "It may be that attractive
neighborhoods make sedentary people more active, but it may also
be that active people congregate where the setting is attractive
and inviting," he said.
"For now, we can add to the list of reasons for controlling litter
and graffiti the possibility that when the grass is truly greener
on the other side of the fence, folks may well go for a walk to
get there," Katz said.
Another expert agreed that the study raises more questions than
it answers.
"The reported differences in physical activity and overweight
are quite dramatic, if the only differences across residential
environments are in amounts of greenery and litter/graffiti,"
said Reid Ewing, a research professor at the National Center for
Smart Growth at the University of Maryland.
"While the authors apparently controlled for sociodemographic
of respondents, I wonder if they also controlled for differences
in the physical environments of respondents beyond those measured
-- differences that may confound their results," he said.
Ewing noted that access to trails and recreational facilities
is known to affect physical activity.
"Could they be picking up that effect in their greenery rating?"
Ewing asked. "And physical activity is known to vary with crime
rates -- could that effect be soaked up by their litter/graffiti
variable?"
There is also the tricky issue of people who would be active
anyway selecting neighborhoods where it is easy and pleasant to
be active, Ewing said. "The environment in that case doesn't shape
the individual, but rather the individual selects the environment."