Deleting the ‘anti-aging’ gene from yeast greatly
lengthens life span, say USC molecular scientists.
Valter Longo, assistant professor
in the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology and the USC
College of Letters, Arts and Sciences, was the study's
lead author.
A counterintuitive experiment has resulted in one of the
longest recorded life-span extensions in any organism and
opened a new door for anti-aging research in humans.
Scientists have known for several years that an extra copy
of the SIR2 gene can promote longevity in yeast, worms and
fruit flies.
That finding was covered widely and incorporated into anti-aging
drug development programs at several biotechnology companies.
Now, USC molecular geneticists suggest that SIR2 instead
promotes aging.
Their study, titled “Sir2 Blocks Extreme Life-Span Extension,”
appears in the Nov. 18 edition of the biology journal Cell.
The lead author is Valter Longo, assistant professor in
the Leonard Davis School of Gerontology and the USC College
of Letters, Arts and Sciences.
Rather than adding copies of SIR2 to yeast, Longo’s research
group deleted the gene altogether.
The result was a dramatically extended life span – up to
six times longer than normal – when the SIR2 deletion was
combined with caloric restriction and/or a mutation in one
or two genes, RAS2 and SCH9, that control the storage of
nutrients and resistance to cell damage.
Human cells with reduced SIR2 activity also appear to confirm
that SIR2 has a pro-aging effect, Longo said, although those
results are not included in the Cell paper.
Since all mammals share key aging-related genes, the paper
points to a new direction for human anti-aging research.
Longo proposes that SIR2 and possibly its counterpart in
mammals, SIRT1, may block the organism from entering an
extreme survival mode characterized by the absence of reproduction,
improved DNA repair and increased protection against cell
damage. Organisms usually enter this mode in response to
starvation.
The long-lived organisms in Longo’s experiment showed extraordinary
resilience under stress.
“We hit them with oxidants, we hit them with heat,” Longo
said. “They are highly resistant to everything. What they’re
doing is basically saying, ‘I cannot afford to age. I still
have to generate offspring, but I don’t have enough food
to do it now.”
Longo predicted that as molecular geneticists master the
levers of aging, they will be able to design drugs that
coax the body into entering chosen aspects of a starvation-response
mode, such as stress resistance, even when food is plentiful.
If enough food is available, an organism might be programmed
both to reproduce normally and to maximize its survival
systems.
Longo urged caution in extrapolating the result to humans.
“We have been very successful with simple organisms,” he
said. “Naturally, mammals are complex, and it will be a
great challenge to get major life-span extension.”
A “really exciting” implication, Longo said, is that cells
may be able to speed up their DNA repair efforts. All organisms
have the ability to repair harmful mutations in their DNA,
whether caused by age, radiation, diet or other environmental
factors. Cancer often begins when DNA mutations outstrip
a cell’s ability to remain differentiated.
Many researchers believe DNA repair systems are already
running flat out. The organisms in Longo’s experiment say
otherwise.
“In our paper, we show that age-dependent mutations increase
at a much slower pace in organisms lacking RAS2 or SCH9
and at a remarkably low pace in organisms lacking both SCH9
and SIR2, raising the possibility that the mutations that
cause human cancers can be delayed or prevented,” Longo
said.
“Notably, mutations that increase the activity of human
homologs of the yeast SCH9 and RAS2 genes play central roles
in many human cancers.” Homologs are genes descended from
a common ancestral DNA sequence.
Joining with researchers at the USC Norris Comprehensive
Cancer Center, Longo is studying the feasibility of reducing
or preventing the age-dependent DNA mutations that cause
cancer.
Longo and his collaborators began studying SIR2 in 2000,
soon after a well-known set of experiments by Leonard Guarente
at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Guarente was
the first to show that over-expression of the SIR2 gene
could extend life span beyond its natural limit.
However, Longo said, “We were convinced that SIR2 had the
potential to be a more potent pro-aging than an anti-aging
gene. And the reason was in part because of the similarity
with this other gene, called HST1, which negatively regulated
so-called protective genes. So we set out to test whether
SIR2 could do the opposite of what everybody said it does.”
The researchers do not quarrel with Guarente’s finding of
a moderate increase in life span when SIR2 is over-expressed.
But their work shows that much greater potential gains lie
in the opposite direction.
Longo’s co-author on the paper was USC research scientist
Paola Fabrizio. The other USC authors were Cristina Gattazzo,
Luisa Battistella, Min Wei, Chao Cheng and Kristen McGrew.
Funding for this research came from the American Federation
for Aging Research and from the National Institute of Aging
of the National Institutes of Health.
- More
articles
on aging.
Reference
Source 125
November
22, 2005