|
Advocates Fear Obesity
Strategy Blockage
Anti-obesity advocates said they fear that a bloc of developing
countries, led by Brazil, could derail the adoption this week
of a global strategy to fight obesity and other diet- or exercise-related
diseases worldwide.
Health ministers are scheduled
to vote later this week on the adoption of the strategy, which
sets out a range of global policy options for addressing obesity
and its related diseases, such as diabetes, heart disease and
cancer.
Major sticking points have been
the inclusion of advice that countries recommend limits on sugar
intake and a reference in the strategy document that taxes and
subsidies are, and could be, used to encourage healthier eating
and exercise habits.
A mention that food and agricultural
policies should be consistent with the protection and promotion
of public health has also raised concerns for some countries.
A senior Brazilian official confirmed
that Brazil plans to propose changes to the strategy document's
language that address sugar limits and agricultural policies,
but said the intention was to finesse the wording so that other
developing countries become more comfortable with it. They seek
approval of the strategy, not to derail it, said the official,
speaking on condition of anonymity.
However, health advocates fear
that the suggested changes will reopen the entire document to
discussion and that the ministers will opt for more in-depth analysis
of the text and its resolution will be stalled.
"It seems to me that the strategy
is unraveling," said Dr. Philip James, head of the International
Obesity Task Force, a coalition of obesity scientists and advocates
pushing for the adoption of the global strategy. "If this doesn't
go through, the world will be a lot worse off."
Speaking on the fringes of the
annual meeting of the governing body of the World Health Organization,
James said the heads of several delegations have shared their
concerns with him.
"Many of the developing country
ministers believe that the problem of diabetes and heart disease
and so on is not really an issue for them compared with the agonies
of malnutrition and HIV," said James.
"They also think that this strategy
has been developed by the Western world and that the sugar component
has been inserted in such a way that the countries that are going
to be most damaged are the poorest countries and that one of their
major sources of income is going to be taken away from them."
"We are seeing that there are blocs
forming, with the Latin American bloc being led by Cuba and Brazil.
The Sub-Saharan African countries are being dominated by the southern
Africa groups that are extremely concerned about malnutrition.
Brazil, one of the world's largest
sugar producers, is coordinator of the Group of 77 developing
countries.
"My guess is that there's going
to be enormous chaos with the African, Caribbean and sugar-producing
Latin American countries opposing, with Asia being fractured in
its support," James said.
Meanwhile, two influential industry
groups weighed in Tuesday with their support for the adoption
of the strategy.
The Grocery Manufacturers of America
and the Confederation of the Food and Drink Industries of the
European Union, called it an important step forward in improving
nutrition, promoting physical activity and combating obesity worldwide.
James said it was early complaints
by the United States that set off the current objections.
The United States submitted comments
to the WHO executive board in January arguing that the science
underpinning the strategy was flawed and should be thrown out
and that personal responsibility for health was the way to address
the issue.
"They may have been testing the
waters," said Dr. Derek Yach, who spearheaded the development
of the strategy at the WHO. "I think they had a try, saw that
it didn't have the support of their major partners the
EU, the Canadians, the Australians _" and have since backed off
and declared their support for the strategy.
The U.S. delegation the strategy,
as now drafted, a "sound blueprint for action for all of us."
Reference
Source 102
For more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick
Prevention Resources".
|