Genetic
Lung Cancer Risk Not
Enough to Make People Quit Smoking
(HealthScoutNews) -- If you knew you were genetically susceptible
to smoking-related cancers, would you kick the habit?
Duke University Medical Center researchers got mixed answers when
they did a study that asked that question of older, inner-city black
smokers.
Those who were told their genetics put them at increased cancer
risk when they smoked were no more likely to quit smoking than
smokers who didn't have that genetic susceptibility, says the
study, which is published in the July issue of Cancer Epidemiology,
Biomarkers and Prevention journal.
The study examined 557 smokers, average age 44, with low incomes
from an inner-city community health clinic.
They were divided into two groups. The first included 185 people
who received nicotine replacement therapy, counseling about quitting
smoking and a self-help guide to quitting smoking.
The other group of 372 people received the same services. In
addition, they agreed to take a blood test for a gene called GSTM1
that's linked to increased risk of lung cancer. The GSTM1 gene
creates an enzyme that detoxifies different carcinogens, including
those in cigarette smoke.
Studies show that people with lung cancer are more likely to
lack the GSTM1 gene. It's estimated that 35 percent of black Americans
may be missing the GSTM1 gene.
The people in this study smoked an average of 15 cigarettes
a day, and 59 percent of them said they tried to quit smoking
within the last year. Sixty-eight percent of the study participants
believed they would eventually get lung cancer if they didn't
stop smoking.
Many of the people in the study already suffered adverse health
effects caused by smoking.
More information
How strong is the link between lung cancer and cigarette smoking?
This page from the National Women's Health Information Center
states that
87 percent of all lung cancer is caused by smoking.
Reference
Source 101
For more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick
Prevention Resources".
|