Study
Finds Cholesterol
Drug Does Not Cut Deaths
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Study after
study has shown that cholesterol-lowering drugs called statins
can prevent heart attacks, but in a new trial the statin pravastatin
(Pravachol) did not reduce the risk of death and heart disease
in people with moderately high cholesterol and high blood pressure.
But the results of the study do
not mean that pravastatin or other statins cannot prevent heart
disease, the study's lead author told Reuters Health.
In an interview, Dr. Barry R. Davis
explained that pravastatin was effective at lowering cholesterol
in a wide range of people in the study. But participants who did
not take the statin but who instead received "usual care"--which
could also include cholesterol-lowering medication--also experienced
a drop in cholesterol, said Davis, who is at the University of
Texas-Houston Health Science Center. The differences in how much
cholesterol dropped in each group "were not big enough" to show
an effect on heart disease and other clinical outcomes, Davis
said.
Statins' record in clinical trials
is impressive, but many groups of people, including women, older
people, racial and ethnic minorities and people with diabetes,
were not adequately represented in earlier studies. The new study,
which drew participants from a larger study of treatments for
high blood pressure, was designed to see how well a statin could
prevent deaths in a wide variety of people.
The study included more than 10,000
people who were at least 55 years old and who had moderately high
cholesterol and high blood pressure. Participants were randomly
assigned to take pravastatin or to receive the "usual care" recommended
by their physician. This care could include cholesterol-lowering
drugs, but this was discouraged unless a person's health took
a turn for the worse.
For lowering cholesterol, pravastatin
was a success, according to a report in the December 18th issue
of the Journal of the American Medical Association. Four years
after the study began, total cholesterol had dropped 17% in people
taking the statin and about 8% in the usual care group. And at
the same time, testing of a random sample of participants showed
that levels of LDL, the "bad" type of cholesterol, had dropped
nearly 28% in the pravastatin group and 11% in the usual care
group.
In a bit of encouraging news, Davis
said, pravastatin lowered cholesterol in a wide range of people,
regardless of age, sex, race or history of diabetes.
It is well known that lowering
LDL cholesterol can reduce the risk of heart attack and stroke,
but the study showed that people taking pravastatin were no less
likely to die or develop heart disease than people receiving usual
care.
These results do not mean that
pravastatin does not provide clinical benefits, though, Davis
said. He explained that during the course of the study, several
other research teams reported studies demonstrating the powerful
cholesterol-lowering effects of statins. Because of the increased
awareness of statins, people in the usual care group were prescribed
the cholesterol-lowering drugs "much more than we anticipated,"
Davis said.
The Houston researcher pointed
out that cholesterol levels also dropped in the usual care group,
although not as much as in people specifically assigned to take
statins. Unlike in other statin trials, many of which compared
the drugs to an inactive placebo, the difference may not have
been big enough to detect any clinical benefits, Davis said.
The study was sponsored by the
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, but it also received
funding from Pfizer. AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb,
which makes pravastatin, donated medications used in the study.
"Physicians might be tempted to
conclude that this large study demonstrates that statins do not
work," according to Dr. Richard C. Pasternak, of Harvard Medical
School in Boston, Massachusetts. "However, it is well known that
they do," he concludes in an editorial that accompanies the study.
What may have happened, according
to Pasternak, is that the drugs may not be as effective in ordinary
settings as they are in clinical trials where participants are
carefully selected and followed closely.
Pasternak has served as a consultant
to or on the advisory boards of several pharmaceutical companies,
including Bristol-Myers Squibb. In addition, he has received funding
from Merck-Medco and has served on the speakers bureau for several
drug makers.
Bristol-Myers Squibb was not available
for comment at press time.
SOURCE: Journal of the American
Medical Association 2002;288:1998-3007,3042-3044.
Reference
Source 89
For more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick
Prevention Resources".
|