Drug
Websites Provide Harmful Info.
Excerpt By
Gene Emery, Reuters Health Writer
BOSTON (Reuters)
- Internet surfers are far more likely to come upon Web sites
with wrong and potentially dangerous information about illicit
drug use than they are to find more reliable, informed sites,
a new study shows.
A study in
Thursday's issue of The New England Journal of Medicine found
that popular Internet search engines tend to direct users to sites
that appear to promote drug use and provide incorrect and even
dangerous information.
Often overlooked
by the popular search engines are those Web sites that provide
reliable information on illegal drugs, including sites funded
by the federal government, the study found.
Some 24% of
college students use the Internet to find information about illegal
drugs, with some sites recording 160,000 hits a day, researchers
said.
Edward Boyer
and two other doctors at Children's Hospital in Boston conducted
the survey, studying seven ``partisan'' sites ''that promulgate
information about illicit drugs.''
``When we
looked at fairly common illicit substances, we found that serious
errors were pretty easy to find,'' Boyer told Reuters.
``Not only
do partisan Web sites condone drug use with its attendant health
risks, but any adverse effect arising from illicit substances
potentially would be mismanaged with potentially lethal consequences.''
FEDS OVERLOOKED?
For example,
one promotes ``cures'' for poisoning from psychedelic mushrooms
such as ingesting carbon tetrachloride, which can destroy the
liver.
By contrast,
sites with reliable information, especially those funded by the
federal government, are often ignored or given a low priority
by popular search engines that rank sites for information on Ecstasy
and other illegal drugs.
``We were
stunned to find the federal government sites were absent from
some searches entirely,'' even though the government is spending
millions of dollars developing them, Boyer said.
One reason
is that those creating government-sponsored sites seem to ``lack
the technical expertise'' to make them appear prominently in a
search, he said.
For example,
most Web sites use hidden keywords to help search engines flag
them. Home pages for sites that promote drug use contain up to
60 such keywords.
But the home
page for freevibe (http://www.freevibe.com),
with drug information from the National Youth Anti-Drug Media
Campaign, had none.
In order to
find freevibe in a search, consumers had to know to ask specifically
for ``freevibe.''
``In all searches,
antidrug sites from the federal government failed to appear as
often as the partisan sites, which dominate the search results
when people are looking for information on illicit substances
such as Ecstasy, GHB, or 'psychedelic mushrooms,''' the researchers
said.
GHB, or gammahydroxybutyrate,
is similar to Rohypnol, the so-called date rape drug, according
to the National Clearinghouse for Alcohol and Drug Information.
``These data
suggest that the US government, despite extensive and costly efforts,
currently does not provide effective alternative sources of information
about drugs on the Web, where partisan sites still get the attention
of both search engines and users,'' the researchers said.
The Office
of National Drug Control Policy, which sponsors the freevibe site,
criticized the study and chastised the authors for failing to
contact the agency before putting out the letter.
``As far as
I know, the people who wrote that letter never contacted this
office,'' said Jennifer Devallance, a spokeswoman for the agency.
She said there
were more than 3,000 links around the Web to either freevibe or
The Anti-Drug, (http://www.theantidrug.com),
which targets parents.
Reference
Source 89
For more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick
Prevention Resources".
|