|
Low-Fat
Diet Cuts Sex Hormones in Girls
Excerpt
By Kathleen
Doheny,
HealthScoutNews
(HealthScoutNews) -- Reducing dietary
fat even modestly during puberty lowers the levels of certain
sex hormones in preteen girls, a new study has found.
Researchers add, however, that
they are not certain if the hormone dip will translate to a lower
breast cancer risk later in life.
High-fat diets have been linked
with the development of breast cancer, although studies are inconclusive,
says Joanne F. Dorgan, an epidemiologist at the Fox Chase Cancer
Center in Philadelphia. "Most of the other studies have been
done in adults, not girls," Dorgan says.
Dorgan led the study, appearing
in today's issue of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
The team randomly assigned 286 girls, aged 8 to 10, to be in the
low-fat dietary intervention group or in the group that received
educational materials from the American Heart Association, which
calls for limiting fat to 30 percent or less of total calories.
Girls in the intervention group
were instructed to limit total fat intake to 28 percent of calories
(with less than 8 percent of that saturated), to eat fiber, and
to limit cholesterol. All girls had high blood cholesterol levels.
The study was an ancillary study
of the Dietary Intervention Study in Children to look at how to
improve cholesterol.
The researchers wanted to find
out if lower fat intake altered sex hormone levels that, in adults,
may be related to the development of breast cancer.
Blood levels of the sex hormones
were measured at the study start and at one, three, five and seven
years. At the five-year mark, girls eating the low-fat diet had
reduced levels of sex hormones compared with girls in the group
not instructed to lower dietary fat. They had 29.8 percent lower
estradiol, 20.7 percent lower estrone, and 28.7 percent lower
estrone sulfate levels during the fist half of their cycles, and
27.2 percent higher testosterone levels during the second half
of the cycles. By the seven-year mark, girls in the reduced fat
group had half the progesterone levels during the second half
of their cycles as did those in the other group.
"The results were stronger
than I anticipated," Dorgan says.
"Experts in the field would
expect some of these changes," says study co-author Victor
Stevens, assistant director for epidemiology and disease prevention
at Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research in Portland, Ore.
"But it surprised everyone that the differences were as large
as they were."
Still, it's too soon to dispense
public health advice for teen and preteen girls, Dorgan says.
The researchers don't think the
hormone drop was enough to affect future fertility. "The
menstrual cycles appear to remain normal," says Dr. Peter
Kwiterovich, a professor of pediatrics and medicine at Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine and another co-author.
The researchers hope to get funding
to bring back the subjects studied, who are now in their early
20s, for follow-up, Dorgan says. Findings from a parallel study
conducted in boys will be reported separately.
Meanwhile, another expert in the
field, Dr. Graham A. Colditz, a professor of medicine at Harvard
Medical School, praises the study as "a rigorously conducted
intervention. This has really shown quite clearly that differences
in hormone levels have been achieved with this intervention. It
breaks new ground."
Rather than focus on whether teen
and preteen girls should lower fat intake or not, Colditz says,
for now, the "real message" should be to maintain a
healthy lifestyle, avoiding excess weight and exercising regularly.
More information
For more information on breast
cancer risk, turn to the American
Cancer Society, which also has a page on prevention.
Reference
Source 101
For more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick
Prevention Resources".
|