|
Premiers
in Canada Meet on Health-Care
OTTAWA (CP)
- Canada's premiers are about to show the nation how they really
feel about Roy Romanow's prescription for health-care reform.
That's not the stated purpose of their
meeting in Toronto on Thursday; their aim is to agree on a common
approach for health-care negotiations with Prime Minister Jean
Chretien in Ottawa on Feb. 4-5.
Premiers will likely focus their public
comments on how much money they need from Ottawa, but they will
be forced to clarify their positions on key aspects of Romanow's
royal commission report.
"It's not just about money," said Maude
Barlow of the Council of Canadians.
"For us, the debate is about whether
we're going to keep a public system in this country or whether
we're going to go the way of the United States, allowing the death
of medicare by a thousand cuts."
One key sticking point between Ottawa
and the provinces is the issue of accountability.
In his report, Romanow called for billions
of dollars in new federal funding to the provinces for health-care.
But he emphasized that pouring money
into the system will be useless unless it brings "transformative
change." He suggested that greater accountability by provinces
in the spending of health money is vital to that kind of change.
Most provinces argue they are already
accountable for spending, for example through their public accounts
and the reports of their auditors general. They say that any additional
requirements would violate their constitutional rights, since
they have jurisdiction over health care.
"Provinces have always been accountable
to their own populace and to their own electorate," said Ontario
Premier Ernie Eves last week.
"I think there's a great deal of accountability
in the system already."
Dana Hanson, president of the Canadian
Medical Association, said it's time for politicians to stop bickering
and put patients first.
"This is an opportunity, the best we've
had in 40 years," he said. "The time is right, let's not lose
it."
Hanson said he doesn't want a rerun of
the federal-provincial deal two years ago, when Ottawa turned
over $23 billion to the provinces without requiring them to account
for its use.
"We can't have another example of September
2000 where money was poured in (without) a strict plan on how
it was going to be used.
"Here we are three years later and we're
saying, 'Where did the money go and is the system any better?"'
Normand Laberge, president of the Canadian
Association of Radiologists, agrees that accountability is a key
issue.
Laberge has had great difficulty determining
what happened to a $1-billion fund for medical equipment set up
in the September 2000 agreement.
His association wrote to each province
asking how the money had been spent, wrote to vendors of high-tech
equipment about what had been purchased and went to court using
access-to-information law in its effort to track the funds.
In the end, there was still millions
missing - and millions more spent on routine purchases rather
than high-tech equipment targeted by Ottawa.
"How come we had to go to court to get
the listing of equipment? That's how come we found lawn mowers,
sewing machine, delivery trucks, pressure cookers."
Stricter accountability is also needed
to ensure provinces don't divert federal money to private health
corporations, said Mike McBane of the Canadian Health Coalition.
He said the public is currently not able
to see some of the contracts the Alberta government has signed
with private corporations.
"That's the reason accountability is
so important, it's the only way to ensure public health dollars
are going to care and not being siphoned off to shareholders,"
said McBane.
"It's really the only lever we have to
keep the public health-care system in place."
Hanson noted that pressure continues
on some fronts for a two-tier health system and the politicians
should realize that.
"Unless (premiers) put forward a clearly
articulated implementation plan, then the whole question of privatization
will indeed continue to be there and may gain strength."
For more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick
Prevention Resources".
|