Main Navigation
 
Search
Advanced Search>>
Free Newsletter
Subscribe
Unsubscribe
 
 
  
Health Headlines

Get the latest news in prevention and health matters. This feature includes daily postings and recent archives to keep you up to date on health reports and wires around the world.
Weekly Wellness
Get informed with weekly wellness facts in a diversity of health topics from prevention to fitness and nutrition.
Tips
Great tips on what you need to know about keeping healthy and active all year round.

 

Radiologists See the (Internet) Light

(HealthScout) -- While the Internet has become a standard means of exchanging photographs by everyone from grade-school kids to grandmothers, many in the medical community have been slow to sign on.

In particular, radiologists have been apprehensive about sending images over the Internet, concerned about everything from image quality to patient confidentiality. So they have continued to use more traditional and more expensive dedicated telecommunications lines to transfer computed tomography (CT) scans and magnetic resonance images (MRI) that help evaluate a variety of medical conditions.

But since it can be hard to even order a new brand of typewriter ribbon in the field of medicine without the support of a published study, research was needed, and a team of radiologists at Ohio's Cleveland Clinic Foundation stepped up to the task.

They concluded that the Internet is not only a radiology image-friendly environment, but it is far more efficient than the present technology.

Their findings, presented at a meeting of the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Chicago last month, compared the speed and reliability of electronically transmitting CT and MRI scans three ways: via a dedicated high-speed telecommunications line, via a slower line supplied by the local phone company and over the Internet between two personal computers using an Internet service provider.

Hospitals and physicians typically use either dedicated lines or local phone company lines.

The study showed that the quality of the images was the same on all telecommunications systems, with no loss of information. In addition, the transmission speed of the three methods was comparable, although Internet speed varied, depending on the time of day.

"We found the Internet performed very well. There wasn't any loss of speed compared to what we were already getting [with the dedicated phone lines]," says Dr. Michael P. Recht, a musculoskeletal radiologist and head of the Section of E-Radiology at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio.

"There was a little bit of variability in our system, but when we improved our bandwidth, that was taken care of. We had not lost images during transmission and there was no image degradation," he says.

Recht says the Internet offers a substantial cost savings.

"At Cleveland Clinic Foundation, for instance, we would have to pay $7,000 a month for a high-speed telecommunications line to one specific clinic, and the local phone company's fees are per-minute long-distance charges, which can add up," he says.

"Obviously, those costs are prohibitive, especially for many smaller and remote hospitals and clinics, which often are even more likely to benefit from sending images digitally for second opinions. Conversely, Internet service provider fees typically are fixed, and much more affordable," he says.

To address confidentiality concerns, most medical facilities encrypt data and restrict access, Recht says. And in 2002, U.S. law will regulate how private information, such as medical images and records, is sent over the Internet.

Dr. David Levin, chairman of the Department of Radiology at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia, says the Internet soon will become the standard for transmitting radiological images.

He says, "Let's say you're a neurosurgeon, and you send your patient to us for an MRI scan of the brain. We do the MRI and interpret it, do a report and then transmit that report back to the surgeon. But the surgeon may want to look at the MRI himself, particularly if he's going to operate.

"So if this technology works out, we could, instead of printing out film, just send the images right over the Internet, and he could pull them right up on his own PC and look at the images right there. It would allow for much faster and cheaper communication of images."

"I think that's going to be the wave of the future," Levin says.

Reference Source 101

For more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick Prevention Resources".

Select a Channel