Timing
May Be Key in
Hip, Knee Replacements
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Waiting too long to replace hips
and knees debilitated by arthritis might hurt patients' chances
of improving after surgery, new research suggests.
A study of 340 patients with severe arthritis found that those who
were in worse shape before their hip or knee replacements were significantly
less likely to be enjoying good health a year after surgery.
Osteoarthritis, the form of arthritis usually associated with
aging, is marked by the gradual breakdown of cartilage in the
joints, leading to inflammation, swelling and pain. When conservative
treatments like anti-inflammatory medication no longer help, surgery--including
total replacement of the joint--may become necessary.
But the decision on when to go for surgery is left to the individual
surgeon, and there is no clear "correct" timing for it, according
to the authors of the new study.
To get a better idea of the role of timing, Dr. Carlos J. Lavernia
and colleagues at the University of Miami School of Medicine in
Florida compared patients who scored below-average on measures
of hip and knee function with those who were relatively better-functioning
before surgery.
The investigators found that among hip-replacement patients,
those who were worse off before surgery continued to have more
pain, less vitality and poorer overall health than other patients.
Similarly, knee patients who started off in poorer shape continued
to be less physically and socially active and have poorer psychological
health--although patients who started out with more pain made
greater improvements in this symptom, compared with their more-healthy
counterparts.
According to Lavernia's team, this suggests that when it comes
to knee-replacement surgery, the joint's functioning--rather than
pain--may be a better predictor of how a patient will fare after
the procedure.
They note that in 2000, the last year of this study, US managed
care plans were not covering surgery for arthritis patients who
had not undergone more conservative treatment for at least 2 to
3 months.
But, the authors argue, allowing patients with severe arthritis
to reach the "lowest level" before surgery is attempted may hinder
their recovery.
The study findings were presented recently in Dallas, Texas,
at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Reference
Source 89
For more information on how to prevent other diseases, use
PreventDisease.com's "Quick
Prevention Resources".
|