Top Health Tools
Top Health Tools

Top Reports
Top Reports
 
Top Articles
Top Articles

Top Reviews
Top Reviews
   
 
YouBlog Archive

From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
October 15, 2010
EVER WONDER WHY NATURAL HEALTH IS ALMOST NEVER ON
THE NEWS IN A POSITIVE LIGHT?
THIS IS WHY....
THIS SHOULD BE A PUNISHABLE OFFENCE.... TO SKEW NEWS
BY FINANCIAL INFLUENCE IS JUST PLAIN WRONG!!!
The mere fact that Gates does it out in the open tells you just how corrupt media has become....
MEDIA WHO ACCEPT GRANTS FROM VESTED INTERESTS SHOULD BE BOYCOTTED AND THEIR LICENSE APPLICATIONS OPPOSED!
http://www.seattleweekly.com/search/index?keywords="Gates+Foundation"


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
October 15, 2010
That's like making us get our hands dirty in a mudpile and then banning SOAP.
The FDA and Health Canada are PSYCHOPATHIC!
The monster is in its death throes flailing in all directions! -- REC

FDA cracks down on chelation therapy drugs




From Eileen Dannemann
October 15, 2010
Are Soldiers’ Suicides Caused by Prescription Drugs?

http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/category/rooms/psyche-ward/


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
October 15, 2010
And people believe they have rights? These scenarios are already being repeated in part
all over the world, tested over and over in disaster situations.... remember Katrina and
the SWAT squads patrolling the Ninth Ward?
Note that the word "SAFETY" is the buzzword.... it is the word that causes untold damage
to rights, because it is tied to the idea of "Trust us, it's for your own good".
In mind control by movie, whatever the elite want us to accept and expect is positioned
as the good guy .

http://predictiveprogramminginmovies.blogspot.com/

Predictive Programming in Movies
Predictive programming is a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as 'natural progressions', as Alan Watt calls it; thus lessening any possible public resistance and commotion.


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
October 14, 2010
Handy catch by George F... these are the rules accepted at the G20, with our PM
commenting on Canada's participation in group economy: "I know some people
don't like it, and it is a loss of sovereignty, but it's a simple reality". (See it on YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McWAnMWoSyY)

Merry Christmas, Canada, from Stephen ("I make the rules") Harper!

These rules take over our economic legislation as of this December, with another
chunk of our democracy GONE. It's now whatever our supposed "representative"
presents at the next G20, versus what the other 19 say... we have ONE VOTE....
and it isn't YOURS.

You really didn't think it was all just about HEALTH, did you?


From Therese
October 14, 2010
The Office of Liquor, Gaming and Racing revokes the AVN's charitable authority
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Approximately 2 hours ago, I received a notification from the OLGR that they would, effective Wednesday, October 20th, be revoking the AVN's charitable status.

They have sent me a letter listing the reasons for this revocation (those reasons are reproduced below) and also the announcement that is being Gazetted today.

(a) that any fundraising appeal conducted by the holder of the authority has not been conducted in good faith for charitable purposes
The Organisation has failed to publish a disclaimer on its website as
recommended by the Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC).
This has resulted in an unacceptable risk of potential donors to the
Organisation being misled when making a decision whether or not to
make a donation, which has led to appeals not being conducted in good
faith.


(c) that any fundraising appeal conducted by virtue of the authority has been improperly administered

The Organisation's website is misleading in that it may lead people
making donations to believe that they are donating to a cause which
promotes vaccination whereas the Organisation adopts an anti-vaccination
position. When requested by the HCCC to publish a disclaimer on its website the Organisation failed to do so.

(f) in the public interest, the authority should be revoked.

The failure of the Organisation to comply with the HCCC recommendation resulted in the Commission publishing a Public Warning on 26 July 2010 advising that this failure "poses a risk to public health and safety". In this circumstance it is in the public interest to not permit the Organisation to conduct fund raising appeals under the Act.

As you can see, the OLGR based their entire decision on the HCCC's demand for us to declare ourselves as being anti-vaccine and putting their disclaimer on our website - two things which we refused to do (they say we failed to do it - there was no failure involved - this was a deliberate move on our part to defend our freedom of communication).

Indeed, instead of changing our current disclaimer to what the HCCC requested, we issued this statement - explaining why the HCCC was wrong and any moves to suppress the AVN were anti-democratic.
I have just sent the following press release to media outlets across Australia. The complainants - all active members of the organisation, Stop the AVN - are just being notified about the OLGR's decision. Both Stop the AVN and the government will be making their own statements today, I am sure.

The OLGR's political decision
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

14/10/2010 - For Immediate Release:

For over two years, the Australian Vaccination Network (AVN), a national volunteer-run health lobby and support group, has been under attack. Our message of individual informed health choice conflicts with the government's policy which is pro-mass vaccination.

Part of this attack has included complaints to the Office of Liquor Gaming and Racing (OLGR), the body that oversees charities.

Earlier this year, the OLGR audited the AVN. It found several errors with our bookeeping system and some minor problems with the way in which we accounted for fundraising income. The OLGR openly stated that there was no evidence of fraud or criminality. Despite this, it has announced that the AVN's authority to fundraise is being revoked.

"Had the OLGR based its decision upon the simple errors which were found during our audit - errors which any small, volunteer-run organisation can and does make - it would have been unfair but not unexpected." says Meryl Dorey, media spokesperson for the AVN. "What makes this decision difficult to understand is that the revocation was based solely upon a questionable decision by the NSW Health Care Complaints Commission (HCCC) which we believe is not relevant to the OLGR's mandate."

The campaign to shut down the AVN has included:
1. Attacks and threats against our advertisers, members and professional supporters.
2. Death threats against committee members.
3. Hate mail.
4. Abusive phone calls and emails.
5. Numerous vexatious complaints against to various government agencies.
In a democracy, it is always in the public's interest to allow citizens access to full and accurate information on all issues so they will be empowered to make their own decision. The OLGR's statement that rescinding the AVN's charitable status is in the public's interest seems to confuse the Australian public with the Australian medical industry.

In a true democracy, the government should be defending its policies in the court of public opinion - not by abusing its power by suppressing legitimate dissent.

For further information, Please contact Meryl Dorey on 02 6687 1699 or 0414 872 032.


I am still trying to get my head around the implications of our loss of charitable status but what I was informed by the OLGR (and I will need to confirm this but for now, I am taking it as read), Wednesday comes, we will no longer be able to accept donations from anyone who is not an AVN member.


Yours in health,
Meryl Dorey


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
October 13, 2010
WHEN WILL HEALTH CANADA STOP MUZZLING ITS
WHISTLEBLOWERS???
When people KNOW that they are THERE... and demand to hear what they have
to say... that's when!!
Ottawa Citizen


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
October 12, 2010
Libby Davies (NDP) responded to an email by saying that C-36 does not mention Natural Health Products because C-6 exempted them... THIS IS A LIE!

QUOTE: "My NDP colleagues and I were successful in removing references to NHPs from the previous incarnation of Bill C-36, and thankfully they do not appear in this bill."

C-36 is NOT C-6, even if it is a more-or-less exact copy. It is separate legislation and stands alone in terms of how the rules apply to this law.
HERE IS THE GIST OF IT:

When Parliament amended C-6 to exclude NHP's, that prevented Health Canada from making a "regulatory change", because if it's written in the legislation, ONLY PARLIAMENT CAN AMEND IT.

Bill C-36 DOES NOT MENTION NHP's... and THAT makes them subject to REGULATORY CHANGE AT THE MINISTRY'S WHIM!

THE EXCLUSION OF NHP's MUST MUST MUST BE INCLUDED IN THE ACT BY AMENDMENT NOW BECAUSE IF IT IS NOT,
COUPLED WITH THE BACK DOOR CLAUSE MAKING US SUBJECT TO TRADE GROUP ORDERS (See "A Question of Sovereignty" AND the new CODEX Movie by Kevin Miller, "Shadows of the Future" at the following link:
http://vimeo.com/15677823 to see how it is done)
THIS MEANS THE END OF THE NATURAL HEALTH INDUSTRY AS WE KNOW IT, AND THEY WILL HAVE SNEAKED IT PAST RIGHT UNDER OUR NOSES!!!
WE NEED TO BE GETTING ON ALL OUR MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT AND PARTICULARLY THE MEMBERS OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE FOR HEALTH!

JUST NOW I TRIED TO ACCESS THE LIST OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND FOUND THAT THE GOVERNMENT'S WEB SITE WILL NOT ACCESS ANY PAGE WITH SUCH A LIST. THIS COULD BE DELIBERATE!PLEASE CHECK THIS YOURSELF, AND IF YOU CAN GET IT TO WORK, EMAIL ME THE CORRECT LINK IMMEDIATELY.
The information page to search from is:
Info page


From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]
October 12, 2010
Physicians form society to challenge AMA and ObamaCare

During the heated debates regarding passage of the ObamaCare legislation, President Barack Obama and the Democrat Party leadership attempted to convince Americans that this medical power-grab was endorsed by the nation's physicians who were members of the AMA.
What Obama's transparent White House failed to mention is that most of this nation's practicing medical doctors are NOT members of the AMA.

"Even as the American Medical Association wanes in membership to numbers some say are below 10% of the nation's practicing doctors, the AMA's dark legacy is starting to take shape," says Adam F. Dorin, M.D., MBA, founder of Physicians Against ObamaCare and co-founder of the National Doctors Tea Party.

"Most doctors are finding themselves peering through a cloudy window trying to understand the backroom deals struck by the AMA," says Doctor Dorin.

The AMA, flush with a government-sanctioned monopoly on medical coding copyrights that yield well over $70,000,000 to its coffers each year, is not budging. Their position of support for the new legislation runs against the sentiments of most practicing doctors. "This is why so many docs have been 'fighting mad,'" adds Doctor Dorin.

According to Steven Malanga of the Manhattan Institute, experts estimate that "abuses of Medicaid (alone) eat up at least 10 percent of the program’s total cost nationwide -- a waste of $30 billion a year. Unscrupulous doctors billing for over 24 hours per day of procedures, phony companies invoicing for phantom services, pharmacists filling prescriptions for dead patients, home health-care companies demanding payment for treating clients actually in the hospital -- on and on the rip-offs go."

As the majority of America's doctors and patients strain to glimpse the future of medical care that is emerging through the shadows, it is apparent that the picture will not be pretty. Non-physicians will be assuming a greater, independent role in providing health care services -- charting new ground in this country's history.
This past weekend, a conservative band of doctors at the California Medical Association's meeting in Sacramento were beaten down in their attempt to pass a resolution denouncing the new Obamacare health care reform law. In Florida this past summer, the state medical association was able to get behind a substantive, if not watered-down, resolution in opposition to the Obamacare law.
The mood amongst most practicing doctors in America is despondent. "Even if Obamacare is eventually de-funded, repealed and replaced -- if not eliminated by way of court challenges and/or state nullification efforts -- there may well be a profoundly negative, lasting effect on the practice of medicine in the United States from elements of the law that are already taking shape," warns Doctor Dorin.
Obamacare strips doctors of their once-elevated and cherished position at the top of the health care delivery system. And many fear the result for quality of care will not be good. As nurses with PhD degrees, nurse practitioners, and nurse anesthetists seek medical degrees through legislative fiat, the system of team-based medical care will be forever changed for the worse.
"The tree of medicine is being shaken so hard," says Dorin, "that not only are doctors falling, but the roots are being pulled out from the ground up ... the tree is dying a slow death."
Doctor Dorin recently formed America's Medical Society in an attempt to pull together disparate groups of individual physicians and disenfranchised medical groups under the symbolic umbrella of one medical society that can truly speak for the majority of American doctors.Examiner link


From 
October 12, 2010

...'While CSL was fast tracking the Swine flu vaccine, the South Australian Parliament hastily began drafting the South Australian Public Health Bill 2009, a radical new health law prototype designed by the WHO which gives the State government total control of the health system.'


'Embedded in the Bill were clauses giving the government legal control over the treatment of ALL medical conditions'...

...'If enacted the Bill gives the SA government the power to impose any form of counseling, treatment, diagnosis or surgical procedure on its residents by force.'...

http://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/B/CURRENT/SOUTH AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC HEALTH BILL 2010/B_AS INTRODUCED IN HA/SOUTH PUBLIC HEALTH BILL 2010.UN.PDF">Read BILL

...'In June 2010, needle shy Aussies were vindicated after the British Medical Journal's editor Dr Deborah Cohen revealed that key World Health Authority advisors - who had declared the pandemic alert - had financial ties to the swine flu vaccine manufacturers and benefitted from the windfall sales of the vaccine.'...

...'If the pandemic failed to sell on the WHO hype, then the South Australian Public Health Bill was a runaway success by WHO standards.'...



Share/Bookmark
...............................................................................................................

This site is owned and operated by PreventDisease.com © 1999-2014. All Rights Reserved. All content on this site may be copied, without permission, whether reproduced digitally or in print, provided copyright, reference and source information are intact and use is strictly for not-for-profit purposes. Please review our copyright policy for full details.
aaa
Interact
volunteerDonateWrite For Us
Stay Connected With Our Newsletter