From Dee Nicholson
Nice job, Lynda... thank you for telling Gerry Ritz what's what. A few comments you were too nice to say, but I
know they were rolling around in your head when you wrote this.....
So... CFIA assesses the "Raw Data", do they? WHOSE RAW DATA would that be? MONSANTO'S????
RAW DATA FROM A VESTED INTEREST???????? It's certainly not the raw data we have, obviously, or
they would not DARE to foist these toxic frankenfoods on us or their own families!
HOW CAN WE DEPEND ON A PARLIAMENT THAT TAKES THE WRONG ADVICE FROM
PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT ACCOUNTABLE TO US? HOW CAN WE TRUST ADVICE FROM VESTED
WE CANNOT. This is a case of the Ritz puttin' US on... instead of the opposite....
Gerry, we will not tolerate you putting us on. Not you, or anyone else who tries. That's a promise, not a threat.
The RULE OF IGNORANCE IS AT AN END.
Dear Minister Ritz:
I could not disagree with you more on your views that GM seeds are safe. However, I do find your position disquieting when Dr. David Suzuki, an expert in biology and Dr. Mercola (an American physician) who researches this very important issue, and above all Jeffrey Smith who has written many articles and books on the ‘problems’ and ‘health’ issues presented by the consumption “GM” seeds completely disagree with your position of trust in the science.
I don’t doubt that you consider the views of the industry that GM seeds (plants) etc. are safe for consumption by all animals, including us. But Dr. Shiv Chopra has reported (among many others) of the death of cattle in India that were allowed to eat corn plants after harvest as they have traditionally done for year and the cattle DIED. How have you explained that?
Mice won’t eat Canola (GE seed); bees will not go near GE crops (as admitted by a scientist in Minnesota doing research on the mysterious demise of bee population) and many other documented cases where illnesses in animals have been reported as a result of consumption of GE food. How do you respond to that? THAT really concerns me, sir. THAT is what you expect ME to eat and my family. Yours as well. The PM’s kids as well. I am flabbergasted at this trust when the above incidences are just ‘blown’ away in your view into the dust bin. You have never responded to those incidences at all, You have just quoted reports to me in a thick paragraph on the ‘research’ saying GMO’s are safe. Explain the DEAD cows, the mice the bees – then I will reconsider my refusal to accept GMO’s as safe.
That is what I am talking about – not the manipulated research from Monsanto or Du Pont who OWN the seeds and OWN the research and feed you and your staff.
Sir, I am NOT a fly-by-night protestor who is uneducated and a rebel. I want my family to eat healthy so they do not succumb to the increasing numbers of ever younger people developing cancers at alarming rates and obesity. Therefore, GOOD food that I can trust in probably the most basic ‘demand’ that I make on industry to provide – with TRUTH to the claims.
Since I am not convinced as are Drs. Suzuki, Mercola and Chopra that GM food is safe, and I can tell you that THOUSANDS of us are NOT convinced either, then at minimum, we should, as a free society and our rights as Canadians and consumers, have the right to SEE on the LABEL if a product contains GMO’s. If you want to eat it, I give you that right to choose. BUT I too should have the right to say NO – and at minimum have industry comply with that demand that is growing. Just as I can say Yes or No to Organic, I should also have that right with GMO’s because it is NOT natural but a manipulated food.
The continued resistance by the Conservative government to initiate a bill requiring industry to identify what foods contain ‘GM’ ingredients on labels shows me a complete ‘lack’ of support for individual rights and I feel as if I am in a communist country where individuals rights are oppressed by government.
Perhaps that is why I voted for the NDP who support the idea that more information is required on GMO’s and labeling should be required. How refreshing that there is a political party that will respond to the concerns of citizens!
I do hope you reconsider this position of yours that ‘all is well’ with GMO’s due to the research etc. that you have received. I do not feel that ‘herbicide’ resistant food is a good thing – it just seems to be an oxymoron in just saying that. Herbicide resistant – eat.
Thank you kindly for taking the time to respond to my queries though. I do beg to differ and you have NOT convinced me and thousands of others though and sir, that is your job to do – and not by force or refusal to comply with thousands of citizens requests by not identifying the GM content of food. Canadians are too smart to fall for that.
L. G. Anderson
From Dee Nicholson
Openly ranting at Bill Gates, and not caring who hears it:
Okay, now, Bill, you've really pissed me off. Who died and made you God, that you get to dictate to the World Health Organization, which dictates to the rest of us? It wasn't enough you forced most of us into using your unwieldy and flaw-wracked computer operating systems.... now you flog depopulation through vaccinations and think we're not onto you?
Oh yes, we are onto you, Billy Boy... you and all your slimy cohorts who just simply think you've got more right to the planet than the rest of us. You who inject the world with your venomous corporatism, willing most of us dead so that you can maximize what you get out of the place. How arrogant is that, that you think you can choose who lives and who dies? Or do you really think we are your own personal herd?
If you do, prepare for the stampede, pal, because when the people flip out (and they will), they will be coming for the likes of you. Think 1789 France. Think knitting needles and little old ladies cackling, "Guillotine! Guillotine!"
We're onto the language of eugenicists like you, Gates. We read what is below and we see what you are really saying behind the weaseling. Your words are wearing thin now. Your "proofs" are disappearing. The connection between neuromuscular disorders and yes, even autism, and vaccines is now being acknowledged, despite your best efforts to demonize the truth. The truth is out there, the proof is now in public domain. The Andrew Wakefields of the world are, in spite of the corruption and payoffs that bought witnesses and opinions, being vindicated. In spite of you. In your face.
You lying, sanctimonious pig of a man, you who would direct people towards a gas chamber of another era with your poisonous needles... you cannot control the Universe, you cannot stop the Law of Karma, you cannot stop what will come to you.
You have mocked God, and God is not mocked.
If I were a better child of God, I would feel sorry for you. Perhaps one day. But not today.
From Phil Segrave
Please listen to the 10 minute attachment and sign the petition if you value your right of choice. Remember in politics silence is consent. Multi National corporations want to control our lives.
You may not realise how serious this is. I urge you to listen to the video on the link below and get involved.
You may not feel that this affects you, but it will. Herbs are already disappearing, next it will be vitamins, minerals and food supplements, then it will be compulsory antibiotics to all animals, irradiation of all foods killing enzymes and rendering them useless, restriction of seeds and plants stopping you from growing your own healthy foods. Your only choice will be pharmaceuticals - chemically made medicine - each with a long list of side effects. Listen to the video and make your own mind up. Don't just think about yourself, think about your children, your children's children - what if they don't want to use chemicals , what if they want natural remedies but our generation let them all go???
From Phil Segrave
The censorship agenda is not just in Europe, it is ongoing in the U. S. and globally. The url you sent is already blocked. Not to worry however, the internet is the biggest revolution of info sharing since the invention of the printing press. Big brother can not stop it.
European Union will scensor and close, pirate websites.
They will investigate all citizens internet activity and downloads, to prevent illegal downloads and piracy.
(its a scam), they will monitor our activities to see which kind of sites we own, what kind of articles we write.
If we write texts about conspiracy and anti-new world order,
they will catch us.
Bill Would Give Justice Department Power to Shutter Piracy Sites Worldwide
* By David Kravets Email Author
* September 20, 2010
Lawmakers introduced legislation Monday that would let the Justice Department seek U.S. court orders against piracy websites anywhere in the world, and shut them down through the sites’ domain registration.
The bipartisan legislation, dubbed the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act...
WASHINGTON (AFP) - The White House unveiled a set of policy proposals Monday for international cooperation in ensuring an open and secure Internet.
"Together, we can work together to build a future for cyberspace that is open, interoperable, secure, and reliable," US President Barack Obama wrote in an introduction to the 25-page "International Strategy for Cyberspace."
Obama, who has made cybersecurity a top priority along with diplomatic engagement, wrote that the document "outlines not only a vision for the future of cyberspace but an agenda for realizing it...
From Phil Segrave
Comment: The drug companies are doing the testing. The FDA (and Canada's counterpart) rubber stamps them. Placebo washouts are just a perception management deception to lend a little authenticity to the whole scam. Incidentally, perception management is on the curriculum of many major universities.
...'Basically, it works this way. Before a drug company starts to test the effectiveness of a medicine they want to market,'...
Today, I want to alert you to a staggering medical practice in clinical trials of psychiatric drugs.
It's called "placebo washout."
Basically, it works this way. Before a drug company starts to test the effectiveness of a medicine they want to market, they bring together all the volunteers-and they give them a sugar pill.
They tell them, "We're going to give you a sugar pill."
After a ten-day period on these placebos, the researchers weed out the people who improved, got better, feel better. They dump them from the ensuing clinical trial. Bye bye.
Of course, they claim there are good reasons for this washout strategy. But the fact is, eliminating these volunteers from the study makes it more likely that the drug will look good.
I'll explain why this is so in a second. But first, in case you don't believe placebo washout is a real and widespread practice, I'll give you two references out of many: RP Greenberg et al, PMID 857037, PubMed-indexed for Medline; and JG Rabkin et al, "Baseline Characteristics of 10-day placebo washout responders in antidepressant trials," PMID.
It's real. They give everybody a sugar pill, and then they dismiss all those who got better on it.
Then they get down to the clinical trial. They divide the remaining volunteers into two groups. Those that will receive the drug, and those who will be given another placebo.
Of course, nobody is told which group they're going to be in. That's the whole point. Blinding the study enables researchers to compare the number of people who get better on the drug with those who get better on the placebo.
You see, it's common knowledge that some people will get better on anything. That's why they test the two groups. They have to prove the drug is performing better than the sugar pill.
General estimates vary on what percentage of people get better on placebos. 35-45%, some researchers say, is a rule of thumb. Sometimes the % is higher.
But wait! The researchers ALREADY kicked out the people who got better on the sugar pill during the 10-day preliminary washout!
That means they're trying to decrease the beneficial effect of the sugar pill in the clinical trial. Get it? Which means, by comparison, they'll claim the drug performed very well.
The FDA, which approves all drugs for public use, knows this. Researchers know this. Shrinks know this. Drug companies know this. Even some medical reporters know this.
And yet, the practice goes on.
Placebo washout is on the order of saying, "Yes, we tested the new plane and it performs magnificently. Of course, we didn't put it into the air. We rolled it across the runway."
If there are any psychiatrists out there who are reading this, any researchers who want to defend placebo washout, I suggest we set up a radio debate with Dr. Peter Breggin, psychiatrist and author. I'm sure I can arrange it. But I warn you. Buckle up. It'll be a bumpy ride. We will get into the air on this one.
Another public service of No More Fake News.
Placebo washout. Rigging the game. Stacking the deck. The bigger the lie and the more obvious it is, the harder it is to believe that's what's you're looking at. Until you LOOK.
In my 39 years as a reporter, I've come across maybe 100 scandals that could cause a significant sector of the medical cartel to burst into flames and blow away in the wind. This is one of those.
Of course, media, government, and drug corporations make sure such a thing never happens. And when I say media, I'm including publications you'd think would love to watch a really good fire. Turns out they have no stomach for it.
From Dee Nicholson
Everything you eat will be GM - DTE cover story
From Eileen Dannemann
In the USA the American Pediatric Association is fostering a early screening program as well. These organizations orchestrate themselves multi nationally. Obviously they pick the age of three years old because that is the age where the vaccine injuries due to the vaccine burden of over 26 vaccine doses occurs and symptoms are clearly evident.
I recommend you subscribe to this CCHR newsletter to keep up on the dumbing down of a generation.
First vaccinate the pregnant mother with the flu shot with mercury. If you don't kill the fetus (H1N1 flu shot had 25X increase in VAERS reports of abortions and still births...and no alarm bell or publicity about it by the CDC).
That is...one flu shot with mercury in utero; one flu shot at 6 months old (with mercury); one flu shot every year (with mercury) through 18 years old. Add to that 39 vaccine doses of other vaccines by the age of 6 years old. Add to that Ritalin, Adderall to suppress and attempt to mitigate the neurological injuries from the irrational children's mandated program. Add to that -the anti psychotics, anti depressants. Add to that...child bearing women of this generation of drugged victims are having deformed babies.
Every three-year-old child in Australia could have their mental health tested under an early intervention program currently being funded by the Australian government.
Patrick McGorry, an Australian psychiatrist at the University of Melbourne who pushes early intervention programs, has a following in the psychiatric industry who are eager to exploit a large class of potential patients, children as young as three years old whom they can diagnose as "at risk of developing psychosis."
They use an organization called the International Early Psychosis Association to promote early intervention internationally.
Of course, their primary published recommendations for "treatment" are antipsychotics, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and sedatives.
Since you already know that psychiatric drugs are harmful for adults, what do you think the effects would be on a three-year-old?
What kind of lunacy would screen toddlers for "the potential to develop mental illness later in life" and give them harmful and addictive mind-altering drugs?
For more information about this, read these posts: