Top Health Tools
Top Health Tools

Top Reports
Top Reports
 
Top Articles
Top Articles

Top Reviews
Top Reviews
   
 
YouBlog Archive

From Eileen Dannemann
October 1, 2010
PATIENTS who refused to have the swine flu jab last year will be vaccinated against it anyway during this autumn’s seasonal flu campaign.
Health officials have said this year’s jab will protect against three types of flu including H1N1 or swine flu.
express.co.uk link
The decision was made after scientists said swine flu will still be circulating this winter and could pose a threat to health.
But many patients may be left feeling upset that a vaccine they did not want to have has been combined with one they did.
Announcing the annual flu campaign yesterday, officials also said that pregnant women would be offered the seasonal flu jab for the first time to protect them against swine flu.
Pregnant women were hit particularly hard by the H1N1 virus and experts are keen to protect as many as possible before further winter outbreaks. UNTRUE...the campaign to coerce pregnant women to get the H1N1 flu shot was based on 30 "mostly unconfirmed" maternal deaths. Yet, corrected statistics, unrecognized by the CDC although it is primarily based on their own Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) show there was between 946-3587 miscarriages/stillbirths due to the untested H1N1 vaccine WITH MERCURY injected into pregnant women.

The seasonal flu jab is routinely offered to everyone over 65 as well as younger patients who have long-term conditions such as asthma and diabetes. Although the pathetic fast track studies done at the early stages of the faux pandemic had inclusion criteria that eliminated all of the population including people with asthma and diabetes; drug addicts, alcohols, people on anti-depresstants...WHO IS LEFT? Their thinking was that if they used the generally chronic ill population (the ordinary person) the study would come out badly...duh. So, despite that it was purposely not tested on the high risk population they are specifically target the pre condition and high risk population.
It is redesigned annually to ensure it protects against the strains of flu in circulation, which tend to change every few years. Up to 15million people have the jab, which can reduce the risk of catching flu and especially the health complications it can cause. Although there is no evidence that the H1N1 vaccine is unsafe, How about upward of 3, 587 miscarriages allegedly caused by the vaccine? (Just as ONE example) many patients simply do not wish to have it. But they will not be able to protect themselves against the other two circulating forms of seasonal flu without being given the swine flu jab.
Professor David Salisbury, of the Department of Health said: “This year the swine flu virus will be one of the most common types of flu going around, and it is important to remind people to remember to get their annual flu jab.
“People should not underestimate the effects of seasonal flu. It is not the same as getting a cold. It can seriously affect your health and the risks of developing complications are greater if you have certain pre- existing medical conditions. Then why did eliminate these demographics from the pathetic studies. As I said earlier, their short studies of about a month to 4 months was done on only the healthiest population.
“If you are in any of the identified at-risk groups, my advice is to visit your local GP surgery and get the vaccination as soon as possible.” My advice to you sir, or madman, is to get a grip on your reality and integrity!
However anti-vaccine campaigners said it was not fair to force patients to be vaccinated against swine flu if they only wanted protection against the other two. Jackie Fletcher from the vaccine campaign group JABS said: “At the very least there should be consumer choice so that patients can get what they want rather than this one-size fits all.
“We also want to know that the Department of Health carefully examine every adverse reaction to swine flu jabs, so we can be reassured the jab is safe”.
Figures show that there are 8,000 flu-related deaths in the winter months in England and Wales that could be avoided.
Unlike other countries, many in the UK are worried about vaccines. Of the 14million patients who were advised to have the swine flu jab, only around five million took up the offer.
Some refused because they were afraid it could increase their risk of a rare immune disorder known as Guillain-Barre Syndrome but studies have suggested this is not true.
Others were put off the swine flu jab over fears it could actually make them suffer swine flu. Again, (Pharma paid and government revolving door experts such as Ms. Gerberding, former head of the CDC and now head of Merck Vaccines) have dismissed these claims. But neither the women that have an empty cradle, nor the the Vaccine Liberation Army has not dismissed these claims of injury! www.VaccineLiberationArmy.com


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
October 1, 2010
Those of you who are old enough to remember Pepsodent might remember the old commercial... "You'll wonder where the yellow went, when you brush your teeth with Pepsodent"... now, there are new lyrics....
"You'll wonder where the money went,
When you give the cash to Parliament...."
Crimes Of The Canadian Banking System
Bill Abram
Over the past 4 years, the Canadian people have paid $137.4 billion in interest on money borrowed from private banks whereas the Bank of Canada could legally print the public's money into existence rather than borrowing it at interest. "They've paid out this huge sum because our government has failed to abide by the law." Abram, a retired high school teacher and activist on Vancouver Island, B.C., explicates the trick of fractional reserve banking.
This is a 2 Part Youtube.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BfHqwTKxHGM
Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INfAWNLhjrY&feature=channel
Part 2


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
October 1, 2010
BILL C-36 has been brought back to Parliament TODAY
for second reading...
the Committees will be hearing it soon...
TIME FOR ALL CANADIANS TO TELL THEIR MP'S TO TRASH THIS BILL AND ANY OTHER BILL THAT VIOLATES OUR RIGHT TO CONTROL OUR OWN COUNTRY'S HEALTH CARE IN HOME-MADE LEGISLATION!
THEY MUST BE TOLD THAT CANADIANS WILL NOT TOLERATE THE EROSION OF THEIR DEMOCRACY OR THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE MEANINGFULLY AS IS THEIR HERITAGE!
WRITE YOUR OWN LETTERS/EMAILS/FAXES OR HANG IN FOR A SAMPLE LETTER THAT WILL SPEAK FOR YOU!
DO NOT MISS THIS CHANCE TO PRESERVE OUR NATION AND KEEP IT IN OUR OWN HANDS!


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
September 30, 2010
I do remember, Vaughn, and I know you helped by adding your voice to ours.
However, to be precise, nobody stopped Bill C-6… it was prorogued. If we had beaten it, C-36 would not have replaced it. Sad, but true.
Meanwhile, despite the fact that Canadians don’t generally storm Parliament over Bills, and we must do the same thing all over again with phone calls, emails, faxes and letters, this time we have a lot more to say, because we have learned a great deal more. and this year, we have the National Health Federation’s backing, as we have become the National Health Federation of Canada. That means we have more access to information-sharing, plus better means of raising funds to help get our lobbying team to Ottawa this time around.
What have we learned?
We have learned that we were absolutely correct in our assessment of the “foreign authorities” to which Bill C-6 contained in its language, which indeed carried over into C-36. If you go to the Legislative Summary of the Bill at link and go to Section 3.2, you will find that yes, Health Canada could be controlled by anything from the UN to a trade group. You also find a paragraph indicating that because this bill is a “public safety” bill (Canada Consumer Products Safety Act), it falls within the requirements for Criminal Code enforcement, and what is worse, indicates (tacitly) that our Constitutional rights could be ignored, because the “Notwithstanding” clause in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms can only be imposed for reasons involving “public safety” and “national security”…. well, do you see the writing on the wall here?
In addition, we now see Senate Bill 510 in the USA… the “Food SAFETY Modernization Act”, which also has the same sort of “foreign authorities” clause in it, according to Attorney Jonathan Emord, who is a health freedom lawyer there. And there are other countries, such as India, which also have such legislation coming forward now.
That connection becomes frighteningly clear when you add in the fact that a new trade agreement called the “Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement” (CETA) is in the process of being put together between Canada and the European Union. The European Union (27 nations strong) has the European Union Food Safety Directives (there’s that word SAFETY popping up again) which are at least as bad as those expected from the WHO/WTO’s Codex Alimentarius, only these rules are now ACTIVE, whereas Codex is not completely drafted yet.
NOW…. thanks to the backdoor clause in C-36, PLUS the CETA agreement coming forward, we can expect that at some point after the intended passage of C-36 and the signing of CETA, those guidelines can quickly be enforced “for reasons of public SAFETY” on Canadians. I remind that in Europe one cannot access full-potency, all-natural health supplements, except by prescription, and at huge cost, and if the EUFSD is applied here, our health food stores will empty out of products which are simply TOO GOOD to comply with their rules.
NOTE ALSO: Control of ANY aspect of Canadian legislation by foreign groups is a LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY, but it is also A LOSS OF YOUR VOTE. Foreign committees do not give a fig for our wishes. Our Parliament will morph into a lame duck (I know, I know, it needs no morphing for that) with no power to influence anything, and OUR DEMOCRACY WILL FADE INTO HISTORY CHUNK BY CHUNK.
NOW, WE HAVE A PLAN OF ATTACK.
NHF CANADA will be lobbying the government shortly, and while we can’t share the specifics or the cat will be out of the bag entirely, we have a set of questions to put before them that will force all MP’s to act in the public interest or admit that they have no interest in serving anyone but their corporate criminal masters. This is not playing nice. But they are not playing nice with us either.
Furthermore, this lobby will become a poll to all members, putting them all on the same hot seat. We will then demand their action to rectify all the wrongs at Health Canada, and failing their immediate action, will ask a federal court to issue an injunction demanding that Health Canada ENFORCE THE FOOD AND DRUGS ACT… something they have never done! If the Act is enforced, Health Canada could literally implode, because all their nastiness is currently reserved for Natural Health Products (NHP’s), while pharmaceuticals get a general pass, with falsified testing, carefully-selected trials, etc. NHP sellers get raided at gunpoint for selling vitamins, but Pharma gets a pass on drugs like Avandia and Vioxx? NOT IF THE FOOD AND DRUG ACT WERE ENFORCED!
The beauty of this is that a court MUST ISSUE THE INJUNCTION, because that is the court’s DUTY… to enforce the law!
We can open this can of worms WIDE, with the help of Canadian supporters, and we MUST do this; if we fail to stop the ability of our government to give away our sovereignty ( See Harper ADMITTING THIS at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=McWAnMWoSyY), we are ALLOWING OUR DEMOCRACY, NOT JUST OUR HEALTH FREEDOM, TO BE ABOLISHED!
Please, all of you who are reading this, WATCH THIS SPACE FOR UPDATES on what to do and how you can participate in the emancipation of our legislation from FOREIGN HANDS! We are setting up donation procedures now, and meanwhile, you can join the National Health Federation of Canada by signing up at http://www.thenhf.com and designating yourself as a Canadian member.
Feel free to share this information, and read the new post that is going up today, entitled “While we were sleeping”… and share that too!
WE NEED ALL CANADIANS TO NOTICE WHAT IS HAPPENING, GET GOOD AND MAD ABOUT WHAT THEY ARE DOING TO OUR COUNTRY, INCLUDING OUR HEALTH FREEDOM!
Thank you, Vaughn, for standing by us, your countrymen, and your nation!


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
September 30, 2010
Notice the ethical practices engaged in by this multinational corporation... and remember... they are members of the Council on Foreign Relations....

Just exactly how Corporations treat people, especially those in the third world. In this feature length documentary, directors German Gutierrez and Carmen Garcia present a searing indictment of the Coca-Cola empire and its alleged kidnapping, torture and murder of union leaders trying to improve working conditions in Colombia, Guatemala and Turkey.

Coca Cola Case


From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]
September 27, 2010
Given that it is a self-evident fact that vaccines have never been proven to be safe or effective, or have any prophylaxis properties whatsoever, by independent scientific clinical studies, obtaining immunity from disease by injecting 'attenuated' or 'dead' viruses (containing toxic preservatives such as mercury, formaldehyde , aluminum; foreign DNA from animals such as chickens, monkies, cats, dogs and human fetal tissue and auto-immune disease activators, which causes the body to attack itself, such as squalene) is junk science based on theory, not science. I am sure you would agree with me, Eileen, that you support Cliffords right to choose injecting his body with anything he wants, whether the efficacy of the contents are based on theory or not, as long as he, and all other vaccination advocates, do not support denying our right to choose also.

The information you publish on www.vaccinationliberationarmy.com is to assist viewers to make an informed choice and excercise their right to self-determination for Clifford and everyone else. Anyone who chooses to ignore the implications of surveys such as:

Thousands of USA pregnant women miscarry after the H1N1 vaccine - September 27, 2010 American Chronicle By Christina England
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/188385
is certainly their prerogative, not an exclusive right given by a government or state to an individual or group, but a right for anyone's own self-determination.

Phil

http://www.youtube.com/user/philsegrave



Share/Bookmark
...............................................................................................................

This site is owned and operated by PreventDisease.com © 1999-2014. All Rights Reserved. All content on this site may be copied, without permission, whether reproduced digitally or in print, provided copyright, reference and source information are intact and use is strictly for not-for-profit purposes. Please review our copyright policy for full details.
aaa
Interact
volunteerDonateWrite For Us
Stay Connected With Our Newsletter