Top Health Tools
Top Health Tools

Top Reports
Top Reports
 
Top Articles
Top Articles

Top Reviews
Top Reviews
   
 
YouBlog Archive

From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
December 10, 2010
NOTICE THE BOLDFACED LANGUAGE HERE:

ALL IN THE INTERESTS OF TRADE, CONSUMER PRODUCT STANDARDS ---
NOW, THINK ABOUT BILL C-36 AND THOSE CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS AND S510, AGAIN, CONSUMER PRODUCT REGULATIONS, AND THEN THINK WHAT IF THEY COMBINE THEM, AND THEN CANADA LINKS WITH THE EUFSD... THERE IS THE MEANS OF BRINGING IN THE EUFSD, CODEX'S EVIL TWIN, TO THE UNITED STATES....
JUST AS PREDICTED WE ARE ALL BEING SET UP FOR TOTAL CONTROL OVER WHAT WE EAT, WHAT WE HEAL WITH, WHAT WE CAN GROW, AND WHETHER OR NOT WE ACCEPT VACCINES.... ALL THESE THINGS CAN BE MELDED TOGETHER FOR A TOTALLY DRACONIAN AND TYRANNICAL POLICE STATE.....
NOTICE THAT THEY ALWAYS USE THE WORD "SAFETY" TO GET AROUND OUR RIGHTS.... THIS IS THE NANNY STATE IN FULL BLOOM.
TIME TO FIRE THE NANNY !!! WE ARE OLD ENOUGH TO DECIDE FOR OURSELVES!
OTTAWA (Reuters) – Canada and the United States are working on a new security and trade deal that would allow people and goods to flow more easily between the two major trading partners, the National Post said on Wednesday.
“The New Border Vision … will include new common consumer product regulations, a pre-clearance agreement for goods crossing the border to reduce waiting times and the use of advanced technology to utilize biometric data for travelers,” said an article on the newspaper’s website.

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6B76BK20101208


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
December 10, 2010
Tories push draconian consumer bill c-36

financial post link

Terence Corcoran, Financial Post • Thursday, Dec. 9, 2010
The free-market-loving Harper Conservatives, fresh from killing the Potash takeover, are on the brink of another demonstration of their radical conservative principles. In what looks like a rush to get it done before Christmas, the Senate is on the brink of passing Bill C-36, the Canadian Consumer Product Safety Act, a bulldozer of a law that gives Health Canada bureaucrats and Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq sweeping new power to regulate thousands of companies and hundreds of thousands of products.
By the time you read this, the Senate may already have cleared C-36. Senators were expected to be working on it Wednesday night and by Thursday morning the bill could be on its way to royal assent. It's the third attempt by the Conservatives to pass consumer protection legislation, reflecting a doggedness that implies Canadians have for the past century been awash in unsafe products, with children and the aged perishing from dangerous toothbrushes, poisonous toys and killer hair dryers.
More people die from poisoned government-provided water than from the hundreds of thousands of consumer products delivered to consumers daily. "From what I've seen practicing in this area of law over the years, there wasn't really a problem crying out for this kind of somewhat draconian legislative fix," said Peter Pliszka, a partner with Fasken Martineau in Toronto.
The Conservatives, alleged champions of less government and more personal responsibility, claim the new law will "modernize and strengthen Canada's product safety legislation." The government, they said, "has listened to the concerns of consumers and parents alike, who want to be confident that the products they buy will be safe for them and their children." Child safety is apparently only something government can ensure and only via vast increases in bureaucracy and sweeping new ministerial powers.
When it comes to laissez-faire, it appears that what the Conservatives have in mind is a laissez-faire regime for government bureaucrats. Bill C-
36 aims to improve consumer product safety with action that includes:
-Prohibiting the manufacturing, importing, marketing or selling of any consumer products deemed or proven unsafe to human health or safety.
-Requiring corporations to quickly inform the government when they discover one of their products is linked to a serious incident, death, or product safety issue.
-Requiring manufacturers or importers to provide test/study results on products when asked.
-Empowering Health Canada to recall unreasonably dangerous consumer products.
-Making it an offence to package or label consumer products that make false or deceptive health or safety claims.
The bill also imposes what Mr. Pliszka calls "onerous reporting responsibilities" on industry and gives the government new prosecution and penalty powers to compel compliance. He also expects more class action suits and major increases in costs on business.
Maybe the Harper government sees it as a job-creation scheme. Work expansion rather than creation is certainly the objective at Health Canada, where this legislative overkill originates. One estimate is that Ottawa will have to hire 200 new "inspectors" to investigate "incidents" of consumer product risk and maintain a database of products.
As for the role of individual consumer responsibility, the government says that responsibility is limited to reporting dangerous products to Health Canada, so the 200 bureaucrats can build their inventory of potential investigations and prosecutions.
The major onus falls on importers, manufacturers and retailers to notify Health Canada of risk and "incidents." The bill is a treasure trove of open-ended possibilities. An incident could include "an occurrence involving a consumer product, whether in Canada or elsewhere, that resulted, or may reasonably have been expected to result in, an individual's death, or to have had serious adverse effects on his or her health." Or it could be a "a recall or measure that is initiated for human health or safety reasons by a foreign entity or a provincial government."
Health Canada officials keep saying that there is nothing draconian or out of the ordinary in C-36.The U.S. has a similar law. "Canadians should expect no less," says the government. Well, yes, Canadians could accept less--especially if less is better than the more that comes with C-36.
No comfort can be taken in the idea Health Canada bureaucrats will be reasonable in their application of their new powers. This is, after all, the same department -- and the same members of Stephen Harper's laissez-faire Conservative Cabinet -- who used existing legislation on dangerous chemicals to ban baby bottles containing Bisphenol-A without one-billionth of an ounce of evidence that such bottles are unsafe. They just made it up so Cabinet ministers could parade themselves as politicians who protected mothers and babies.
The Conservatives are not alone in this. Their consumer protection act has the backing of the Liberal and NDP opposition parties, which means there has been no political conflict or media coverage since C-36 was suddenly resurrected in early October. What we have in Ottawa over C-36 is a coalition of interventionists and statists rallying around Big Government Conservatives.


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
December 7, 2010
THESE ARE THE PEOPLE HEALTH CANADA SICS ON HEALTH STORE OWNERS...
BUT THEY DO NOT TELL THEM IN ADVANCE THAT ALL THEY ARE LOOKING FOR
IS VITAMINS.... SO THE POLICE ASSUME IT'S DANGEROUS AND ENTER WITH GUNS
DRAWN.

RCMP, WHO ACCOMPANY HEALTH CANADA ON RAIDS AGAINST NATURAL HEALTH PRODUCTS, NEED TO BE TOLD THAT GUNS-DRAWN RAIDS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE ON SELLERS OF ESSENTIAL NUTRIENTS AND/OR RAW FOODS!

BRUTAL, PSYCHOPATHIC ACTIONS BY POLICE OFFICERS ARE RAMPANT TODAY, AND THE ONLY SOLUTION IS FOR PEOPLE TO SPEAK OUT AND MAKE A CHANGE.

calgaryherald.com brutality


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
December 7, 2010
Butter is Better

Why ANYONE would want to substitute margarine for butter is beyond me... it's one molecule away from plastic, and flies won't even light on it! If a garbage-scavenging insect won't touch the stuff, why should YOU?

Remember... healthy hearts do NOT make money for Pharma....

mercola.com why-is-butter-better


From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]
December 7, 2010
As for the remoteness, 'Recombinomics' very conspicuously omitted report that. As for importing the bug, someone from Mongolia or Japan maybe? They are the ones who got the body bags, instead of medical supplies.

However, there is still the issue about the 'blood cough', despite the likelyhood the bug was manmade and released there. If this thing goes epidemic, it could be a worse flu season than 2009. Phil


From Dee:
People do not realize how remote a community it is that is being affected. The reserves up north
in Manitoba are almost fly-in only. And there are no pigs.... it's not the best land for farming.
There is very little contact with the outside world up there so this bug would have to be introduced
somehow.Government people are up there frequently enough to do that but the very idea of a flu
outbreak on that reserve is ludicrous... the bug would have hit others outside the community before
that, because it would have had to be introduced in some logical fashion and would have been seen
somewhere else first.... but nobody is talking about how the flu got there.
This is the same reserve they used as guinea pigs last year.... they seem to think that no-one will pick
up on the isolation factor.
Very interesting, but absent a logical way of getting the virus up to that community,
absolutely a scam using these people... again...
dee


Could this be the re-emergence of last years 'Mexican swine flu outbread' with Ukraine's mysterious coughing up blood component? What-ever-the-case, it appears the bird/swine/human mix is back:

...'trH3N2 has a seasonal H3 and N2 from the 1990’s but is a triple reassortant with an avian PB2 and PA, and a human PB1 from 1996.'...


...'In addition to the outbreak in Manitoba, media reports describe an H3N2 outbreak in Mongolia that is also H3N2 and affecting children.'...


...'trH3N2 in Canada or Mongolia would signal a swine H3N2 pandemic. More information on these cases as well as the fatal H3N2 outbreak in Akita, Japan would be useful.'

http://www.recombinomics.com/News/12031001/H3N2_Manitoba.html


From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]
December 7, 2010
Wikileaks, I think, is a fraud. Nothing the intelligence agencies of the world do not want leaked, is not going to get leaked on Wikileaks. However, it can serve multiple agendas: Shape public perceptions in a malevolent way, serve as a bad boy whistleblowing tool so the regulators can take the good whistleblowing sites down with it and, in the mean time, fool patriotic leakers/whistleblowers into sending in good info that will get into the hands of the bad guys.

From Silvio:

there is a big scandal about this website :-)
someones said that he received treats to his life.

I think is very strange, the website only reveal documents about war,
they have any documents about extraterrestrials, ufos, alien bases, chemtrails, microchips, illuminati, Banksters,
is strange isnt?

But I have a feeling, that the scandal about "wikileaks" will serve to the Governments scensor all the conspiracy websites in the world.
Its a virtual Inquisition on the web, running...


From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]
December 7, 2010
Who Owns You?

The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.)

2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816)

3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654)

4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg.113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288)

5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of operating under bankruptcy its finally over. (Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the creditors or share holders or you will go to Prison.18 U.S.C. 914

6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though the "US Government" held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239)

7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) Read the cites above)

8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)

9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)

10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House Report (103-826)

11. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System. *

12. The UN is a One World Super Government. *

13. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations. *

14. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2)

15. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.)

16. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if you receive one. It should have written on the top left United States Treasury.)

17. You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session)

18. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502)

19. The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23 and 24)

20. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80)

21. You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)

22. America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.)

23. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213)

24. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54)

25. A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209)

26. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)

27. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493)

28. The Pope's laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44)

29. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children. (Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481)

30. Military Dictator George Washington divided the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg 99. Websters 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.)

31. "The People" does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243)

32. The United States Government was not founded upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.)

33. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.

34. Everything in the "United States" is For Sale: roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water, prisons airports etc. I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to check? (Executive Order 12803)

35. We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037)

36. The UN has financed the operations of the United States government for over 50 years and now owns every man, women and child in America. The UN also holds all of the Land in America in Fee Simple. *

37. The good news is we don't have to fulfill "our" fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another's fictitious obligation. *

38. The depression and World War II were a total farce. The United States and various other companies were making loans to others all over the World during the Depression. The building of Germanys infrastructure in the 1930's including the Railroads was financed by the United States. That way those who call themselves "Kings," "Prime Ministers," and "Fuher,"etc could sit back and play a game of chess using real people. Think of all of the Americans, Germans etc. who gave their lives thinking they were defending their Countries which didn't even exist. The millions of innocent people who died for nothing. Isn't it obvious why Switzerland is never involved in these fiascoes? That is where the "Bank of International Settlements" is located. Wars are manufactured to keep your eye off the ball. You have to have an enemy to keep the illusion of "Government" in place. *

39. The "United States" did not declare Independence from Great Britain or King George. *

40. Guess who owns the UN?
________________________________________


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
December 7, 2010
When I was a child, having a nanny was a good thing. But I'm all grown up now, and I am not interested in any way, shape or form in having the state as my nanny now.

After the debacle of the H1N1 "pandemic" vaccine, which caused many, many adverse events (which the government conveniently does NOT talk about and which have never been assessed and compensated despite Harper's public promise to do so), and since there is absolutely no valid evidence proving the efficacy of vaccines, but plenty of evidence showing damages and in fact increases in the incidence of many diseases meant to be prevented by these vaccines, many people are now rejecting the vaccination theory entirely.

This registry legitimizes a process that was invented by a British man called Dr. William Jenner, who bought his medical license (it cost him a princely 18 Pounds Sterling), and never went to medical school, and the horrible adverse effects were covered up by the British Medical Association. The story of how vaccination came to be is enough to curl your hair.

When vaccination is proven to work, and diseases ALL magically disappear because of their administration, THEN, and only THEN should people accept any mechanism which could be used to force this medical treatment.

Our freedom of choice is at stake here. Informed consent, our absolute right under the law, is quickly disappearing, and in order to ensure that we are accorded these rights, we must not allow government such easy access to ourselves and our children.

People need to stop being lazy about their health, and do their research on ANY treatment offered by the medical community. Their lives depend on it, and the dismissal of their right to informed consent is the death knell of freedom of any variety in this so-called "free" country.


theprovince.com


They just don't stop caring about us. The Human Resource Units need to be monitored, and registries of everything possible are the best means. With this one, they can find out which units are not in compliance so as to ensure they are properly handled the next time a "pandemic" is announced or another new vaccine mandated. But don't think this is some new proposal. This has been pushed for since at least 1996:

Vote NO to national vaccine health registry!

http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/im/cirn-rcri/index-eng.php

The government already has such registries listed and detailed, but as the proponents state the provinces need to be "harmonized":

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hl-vs/iyh-vsv/med/regist-eng.php

Some nice info there about how you'll be tracked and how "decliners" will be "advised" of their negligence. As always, if you wish to speak your mind the CBC story has a comments section:

http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2010/12/06/immunization-registry.html


From Dee Nicholson [dnicholson@yaknet.ca]
December 6, 2010
Like the US Department of Agriculture, Health Canada ignores court orders.
TIME THEY WERE MADE TO OBEY.
WAHOO!!!! Judge Orders Monsanto to Destroy GMO Sugar Beets

healthfreedoms link


From Eileen Dannemann
December 6, 2010
http://vaccineliberationarmy.com/category/articles-breaking-news/

Law prohibiting Incandescent Light Bulb Helps Job Market in
From Newsmax:

Federal Light Bulb Ban Creating Jobs in China

A federal law banning ordinary incandescent light bulbs has already had a negative effect on the American economy — GE has closed its last major bulb producing factory in the United States, creating job opportunities in China.

Legislation enacted in 2007 orders the phase-out of incandescent light bulbs beginning with the 100-watt bulb in 2012 and ending with the 40-watt light in 2014. These bulbs cannot meet efficiency requirements dictated by law.

Compact fluorescent lights (CFLs) are the least expensive alternative. But the manufacture of CFLs is “labor intensive and too expensive to be done at U.S. wage rates,” according to a report from The Heartland Institute, which estimates that domestically produced CFLs would be 50 percent more expensive than bulbs manufactured in China.

So instead of retrofitting its plant in Winchester, Va., to produce CFLs, GE closed the plant in September and laid off 200 workers.

CFLs are already being manufactured in China, and increasing American demand will no doubt create new jobs there.

As the Insider Report disclosed earlier, while CFLs use about 75 percent less energy than incandescent bulbs and last far longer, they cost significantly more, take longer to turn on, can flicker, and contain small amounts of highly toxic mercury, which creates problems for users when they break or need to be disposed of after they burn out.

“Environmental activists and their allies in Washington were either too ignorant of basic economics to see these job losses coming, or they were simply too callous to really care,” said Heartland Institute science director Jay Lehr.

“Either way, compact fluorescent light bulbs in the real world fail to live up to environmental promises, unnecessarily subject American households to toxic mercury, produce poor-quality light, and are sending American workers to the unemployment line.”

And Sam Kazman, general counsel for the Competitive Enterprise Institute, said: “If the new energy-saving technologies being pushed by government are really that good, then we don’t need government to mandate them. And if they are being mandated, that’s a sure sign that they’re not very good.”

Three Republican members of Congress — Joe Barton, Marsha Blackburn and Michael Burgess — have introduced a bill that would repeal the ban on the incandescent bulb.

The three said in an article on The Daily Caller: “The unanticipated consequence of the ’07 act — layoffs in the middle of a desperate recession — is what sometimes happens when politicians think they know better than consumers and workers.”


From Phil Segrave [psegrave@yadtel.net]
December 6, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3kVWqb8M7U

A public service message from Robert Higgs of the Independent Institute:

http://Independent.org
http://is.gd/iaHZL

Young people and foreigners who are unfamiliar with the conduct of public affairs in the United States sometimes have difficulty in decoding the rhetoric used to describe government actions in this country. As a public service to such political novices, I have drawn up a brief guide whose entries match a particular government action, objective, or condition with the terms commonly used to describe it in the news media and in polite conversation. Simply apply the rule: If the government does X, it is called Y.

X = extortion; Y = taxation

X = robbery; Y = taxation

X = unjust (and often pointless or destructive) compulsion of innocent persons; Y = regulation

X = kidnapping; Y = imprisonment of persons convicted of [victimless] crimes

X = torture; Y = enhanced interrogation techniques

X = imperialism; Y = global peacekeeping operations

X = spying on citizens without cause; Y = homeland security operations

X = sexually assaulting and battering airline passengers — men, women, and children alike; Y = airline security operations

X = herding, stripping, and irradiating airline passengers — men, women, and children alike; Y = airline security operations

X = accepting bribes; Y = accepting campaign contributions

X = propagandizing the general public; Y = holding official press conferences

X = indoctrination in servility and loyalty to the state; Y = public education

X = savage, pointless massacre of foreigners; Y = national defense

X = unjust enrichment of private individuals and corporations; Y = subsidies

X = beating, tasing, and shooting innocuous persons; Y = making arrests

X = debasement of the currency; Y = quantitative easing

X = fostering systemic economic booms and busts; Y = monetary policy

X = fostering systemic economic booms and busts; Y = fiscal policy

X = wasting and destroying natural resources; Y = implementing conservation policies

X = suppressing liberties on unjust and baseless grounds; Y = implementing environmental policies

X = serving the interests of the Israeli state; Y = carrying out Middle East policies

X = maintaining a police state; Y = maintaining law and order, public health, and national security

X = lying about everything of consequence; Y = keeping the public informed

X = robbing productive Peter to pay unproductive Paul; Y = maintaining the safety net

X = murderous, blundering, destructive global intervention; Y = U.S. foreign policy

X = suffering blowback; Y = being attacked because foreigners hate us for our freedoms

X = unjustly enriching Goldman Sachs et alia; Y = preventing another Great Depression

X = deferring and worsening the inevitable day of reckoning; Y = stabilizing financial and housing markets

X = rigging the game to ensure the reelection of incumbent members of Congress; Y = democracy in action

X = bribing or intimidating foreign governments to assist big multinational corporations; Y = U.S. foreign policy

X = gratifying one's megalomania and feathering one's nest at public expense; Y = public service

X = war; Y = peace

X = slavery; Y = freedom

X = ignorance; Y = strength



Share/Bookmark
...............................................................................................................

This site is owned and operated by PreventDisease.com © 1999-2014. All Rights Reserved. All content on this site may be copied, without permission, whether reproduced digitally or in print, provided copyright, reference and source information are intact and use is strictly for not-for-profit purposes. Please review our copyright policy for full details.
aaa
Interact
volunteerDonateWrite For Us
Stay Connected With Our Newsletter