Top Health Tools
Top Health Tools

Top Reports
Top Reports
 
Top Articles
Top Articles

Top Reviews
Top Reviews
   
YouBlog Archive

From Dee
My 2 Cents' worth (Ooops, forgot, no more pennies, so that rounds down to.... well, nothing....)

A "Private notion" that our kids are in fact OURS, not the government's, to do with as it pleases? Who is this broad kidding? The absolute mess the system has made of a huge number of our kids already surpasses the imagination. They can't think well enough to solve anything and are now merely little data banks accepting programming like free lunch. I'm seeing mothers all excited because their child can handle a computer at the age of 2... not realizing that this is the new babysitter, and that while it's real neat to see the skills little children can exhibit, it's not so neat to see their minds crammed into little pods, never to break free again. Nor does anyone think to examine the big business of "child welfare services", which reaps a lot of coin to take children into care and therefore has no motivation to leave them with their parents while they help the PARENTS to cope, heavens, can't have that.... then they hand them over to the fostering system, in which we find abusers and pedophiles alike, luck of the draw....

Actual communities, as I recall from growing up, are parents to all children anyway. On my street if a kid had a problem, they could go to ANY home to find help. No child was left unprotected. But a real community comes together naturally, as people meet and interact with each other. It's not legislated, nor is it legislatable, in my opinion, any more than morals can be legislated. So when this professor talks about community, it isn't a real community, more like a committee, which is an entirely different thing. Communities are based on common ground. Committees are legislators over others.

NONE OF THIS WILL STOP UNTIL WE STOP IT.
PARENTS OF THE WORLD, WHERE ARE YOU?

www.nomorefakenews.com

Bye-bye daddy, bye-bye mommy: MSNBC discovers who children really belong to. Finally. This burning question has been answered. What a relief.

Melissa Harris-Perry, a university professor and weekend host at MSNBC shares the wisdom:

"We have never invested as much in public education as we should have, because we've always had a kind of private notion of children---'your kid is yours and totally your responsibility.' We haven't had a very collective notion of 'these are our children.' So part of it is we have to break through our kind of private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families and recognize that kids belong to whole communities. Once it's everybody's responsibility and not just the household's, then we start making better investments."

How many ways to take this hogwash apart?

A "kind of private notion of children." Yes, how primitive. I mean, only bitter clingers would ascribe to this ancient concept, right? Such parents need re-education, they need to move into the modern age and embrace many mothers and fathers, including I suppose, Melissa Harris-Perry herself, although I'm sure her schedule is already overcrowded. But perhaps she's good for a nod and a wink between violin practice and soccer games where nobody wins.

Then, precisely what community should own your kids? Your block, neighborhood, town, city, nation? People you know? People you don't know and never will? A coalition? Perhaps...the government? Ah yes, that would would be it, wouldn't it?

Because, as any good collectivist knows, the government is the ultimate "expression" of the people. The government creates, manages, and sustains the collective. The government decides, the people comply. The government knows best.

Therefore, all you whacko parents out there; stop thinking your children belong to you. You're wrong.

Hillary Clinton knew this. That's why she wrote It Takes a Village, another collectivist manifesto. Except her community happens to be nannies, the Secret Service, the State Department, the Senate, and the White House.

Since Melissa Harris-Perry is discussing public education, you can be sure the collective solution to your kids will involve more vaccines, more psychiatric appointments, more diagnoses of fictitious mental disorders, and more doling out of highly toxic and violence-inducing drugs.

More sex-ed at age five and six, since you parents don't have a clue about sex and shouldn't be allowed to approach it. More instruction about "sharing" as the basis of all knowledge.

Essentially, a collective is a group of people teaching others about the primacy of the group. It's a madhouse from start to finish. It takes the principle of the inviolate individual and burns it to the ground.

It attacks the family precisely because the family resists the collective in any society where a few shreds of freedom remain. The family is a potentially dangerous source of decentralized power.

Harris-Perry is really advocating the sacrifice of your children to the "wider problem of all children." Don't raise your kids according to your own best principles. No. Give them over to "the wiser ones." Let's all do that.

Her solution also, of course, involves an enormous shift of responsibility. Parents can unload that burden. The "community" will shoulder it. I can't wait.

This is the strategy of regression to the lowest common denominator. Since there are truly horrible parents out there who can't handle family life, let's all give up the primary job of raising children in order to save those parents who are abject failures.

Behind this is the program to destroy families and elevate the State. Make no mistake about it. It's an op from the ground up, and always has been.

Just as state and county and city governments have been targets for the federal government, so is the family. The idea is to overwhelm all opposition to federal power. Under the mask, that is the naked face of the collective: everybody organized under central dominion.

Going still further, we enter the Globalist plan. Institute a world collective, in which every citizen is directly beholden to Earth's princes and their bureaucrats, "for the good of all."

It's a stage-magic trick. Erase the individual and all he stands for. Here was here---and then, poof, he's gone. A mere trace of a memory remains.

If Melissa Harris-Perry wanted to talk about family, you'd think she would have stressed the greater responsibility of a mother and father. At home. She would have talked about alcoholic parents, inattention toward kids, the need to take home life very seriously. But instead, she went the other way.

She didn't even offer a tip of the hat to churches, neighbors, clubs, cousins, uncles, grandparents---those people who do, in fact, form communities. Not grist for her mill. No, because she's talking about money. Spending more money on public education. And for that, you need myth and fairy tale.

You need the disastrous construct of a public institution that will carry the job of bringing up children.

As if that were possible.

Perry rejects Private in favor of Government, which is her bread and butter. Public policy. Abstractions seeking a New World.

Much in the same way, Obama endlessly mouths, "We're all in this together."

The "this" turns to be the surrender of fierce freedom and independence.

I would like to see millions more parents deliver the correct response to Perry. Home schooling. That would solve it. That would deliver a profound message:

Babble on as long as you want to about pie-in-the-sky communities; try to melt the citizenry down into one giant glob of goo; fake your way into legends of better and more expensive schools replacing parents.

It's for nothing. People know you're a hyping con artist. People know that families and good education begin with real parents and can't succeed without them.

The "new collective spirit" is very old. As old as the hills. College kids who know as much history as caterpillars out for a stroll after the rain are buying this lunacy, but when they leave the friendly confines of school, they'll discover the only place they can find a job is with the government.

And that tells us something about who will swell the ranks of the collective. Those who have been rendered disabled by education. This is the public department Perry wants to improve.

We need more money to brainwash more children. That's the underlying message.

To spread it, you only need one college with one cheap four-year class: the students sit in front of their laptops and phones and watch MSNBC 24/7.

To those students whose breath can still fog a mirror, you offer a piece of paper after four years. The paper tells them they've matriculated, and they can now be reborn as mosquito drones and launch out into the atmosphere of big government and find a communal nest.

O wonder of wonders. Parenting was unnecessary.

Jon Rappoport
The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

From Phil

Subject: Fw: Very informative Vidoe film - Enslaved By "Smart Technologies" in Canada and the World- 2013

Added Comment: Watching this 37 min video clip will give you an understanding of the SMART GRID and Smart Technologies that takes you beyond the propaganda and advertising that tries to sell the “benefits” to an unsuspecting and uninformed public.
Already PRIVACY is literally becoming non-existent as total surveillance begins to envelop every aspect of our lives.
If we value a life in which every aspect of our lives is not to be totally determined and controlled by external, invisible ”global dictators” using a totally integrated electronic and computerized surveillance and control Smart Grid to implant THEIR AGENDA 21 – the One World Governance Agenda., then we have to be far more analytical and discerning, far more aware as to where this is leading.
It demands total vigilance to avoid swallowing the brainwashing sales pitch and propaganda that the Pied Pipers use to dress up this diabolical plan with a lure to make their plan of enslavement “look so very appealing” with “benefits of convenience and expediency”.
Be diligent NOW before it is too late when this becomes totally installed and “our prison” is under total surveillance.
This means that we have to say NO to these total integrated electronic technologies, even if it means not having every instant communication capability.
Not all that shines is gold!
Beware of the “Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing”. You can predict with certainty that the Wolves intend to devour the sheeplets.
---------------------------------------------------
from the website
Enslaved By “Smart Technologies” in Canada and the World = 2013
http://canadianawareness.org/2013/02/enslaved-by-smart-technologies-in-canada-and-the-world-2013
By Frankie Gotz
– Posted on February 12, 2013
Posted in: Documentaries, World News
It seems like now a days you can’t go a day without hearing some type of advertisement about smart technologies such as smart meters, smart appliances, smart cards, smart energy smart homes and smart grid.
Technology and the internet allowed us to advance and has enabled us to connect in ways never before imagined. But as time keeps slipping into the future, more and more I see the internet being expanded and used as a systematic tool to spy on populations with integrated smart technologies that will be essentially used to control everything within what is called a ‘smart grid’.
The settings portrayed in the famous book written by George Orwell “1984″ are coming into our reality, futuristic technological enslavement where big brother has full control of everything and knows all our actions at all times.
A lot of people labelled as conspiracy theorist have warned the general public for years, and as we drift further past 2012 into the future, the more it seems that those labelled as conspiracy theoriest are becoming correct in some of the things they are trying to warn the public about.
This film examines and explains The Smart Grid and how it will be used with integrated “smart” technologies to spy and control everything. Also will explain how the smart phone will be used to bring in cashless society hooked up to the smart grid.
This film will explain how it’s all interconnected to an agenda put forth from the United Nations years ago known as Agenda 21. [This film will give minor detail on Agenda 21 but enough to give the viewer a better understanding. I encourage everyone to further the investigation and stay tuned for Canadian Awareness Network's upcoming film "The Rise of the United Nations Agenda 21".]
http://canadianawareness.org/2013/02/enslaved-by-smart-technologies-in-canada-and-the-world-2013





Enslaved By “Smart Technologies” in Canada and the World- 2013

From Phil
Deaths and Adverse Effects from many Vaccines are kept CONFIDENTIAL. WHY?
Cdsapi’s Added Comment: The vaccine programs to which today’s infants are being subjected, often at time of birth, containing ever more multiple disease challenges in one shot, consisting of a cocktail of very toxic adjuvants, preservatives, genetically engineered DNA fragments and a host of unidentified and unidentifiable "run-along substances and pathogens" constitute a mass-experiment travesty in which these infants are really being used as experimental lab rats and guinea pigs, subjected to mass experiments that are using unsafe, untested products that present one of the most serious dangers that these children will ever face.
Worse still, it is being mandated as government Health Policy – in the name of prevention.
The manufacturers have been granted total immunity, and are not accountable for any liability. What a wonderful business arrangement!
The taxpayers pay the bill for it all – for the original vaccinations and for the health costs of the devastating aftermath.
The parents are being kept in the dark and are fed coercive "fear-mongering propaganda",
and all the while, the "ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES" are kept under wraps, kept as secret as possible, not reported in the professional literature, not reported to the government agencies. no warning to the parents, not released to the media - all to protect the corporations and the "profits of a trillion-plus dollar industry".
First, what idiot mentality came up with the notion that it is safe to shoot many multiple diseases simultaneously into the blood system of a newborn infant - and call it "protection".
When some kids "don’t make it", are they just considered collateral damage that is "acceptable" in the Risk/Benefit equation of "the Greater Good for the Greater Number"?
Are parents being told that some of their kids may be "sacrificed" for "the benefit of the herd"?
Are parents being told that their kids are being used as "test subjects" for new vaccines and multiple vaccine combinations that are hitting the marketplace on "fast track"?
Or is it all just one big, very profitable, mass experiment - and the kids are the lab-rats.
Where is the authenticated science? Or is it all "Science by Declaration and Decree"
Why are BC infants still being subjected to this vaccine, given the evidence of harm?
Who is protecting the children????? Obviously, NO ONE!
When you read the following report, you can stop wondering why ever more parents are no longer willing to march their children down the path that leads to the altar of the "vaccine religion".
-------------------------------------------
GSK's Infanrix vaccine cocktail was linked to over 800 types of adverse reactions - over 800 in Belgium babies.
Bear in mind, that when it states that 36 babies died, that officialdom admits that only 1-10% of reactions ever get reported. So most don’t.
Now get this... This GSK vaccine is not used in the U.S., nor in any other place in Canada, except B.C. So is B.C. being used as a testing ground as this article suggests?
http://vran.org/wp-content/uploads/Initiative-Citoyenne-Press-Release-Infanrix-Hexa-6-12-12.pdf

Safety of the Infanrix Hexa Vaccine: Confidential Document from GSK to the Authorities
We seem to have acquired a 1,271-page confidential GSK document, ordinarily reserved for the authorities.
Topic: the pharmacovigilance of the Infanrix Hexa (6-in-1) paediatric vaccine. (1)
The Infanrix Hexa vaccine is a "free" inoculation administered to almost all the infants in Belgium, mainly through the ONE (Office de la Naissance et de l’Enfance = Office for Childbirth and Childhood) but also through paediatricians and general practitioners. It is intended to protect newborns and infants from six different illnesses: Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whooping Cough, Polio, Haemophilius Influenza B (HIB) and Hepatitis B.
The document in question details the adverse effects of this vaccine, reported back to the manufacturer from various European countries between the 23rd of October 2009 and the 22nd of October 2011.
We can understand why it is confidential: no less than 825 different types of complication and adverse effect are mentioned.
It is important, first of all, to point out that the list covers a very broad range of adverse effects potentially involving each and every system and organ in the body: the blood, the cardiovascular system, the nervous system, the immune system, the lungs, the skin but also the sensory organs (sight, hearing…), the musculoskeletal system, the joints, the urinary system, the digestive system and the endocrine system.
During this specific period of time, GSK received 1,742 reports of adverse effects, of which 503 were serious effects not listed and 56 were serious adverse effects listed.
The events registered included 36 deaths (over the two-years period), most of which occurred within three days after the child received the Infanrix Hexa vaccine.
According to GSK, the adverse effect notification rate was 14.6 per 100,000 doses distributed but don’t forget that the number of doses actually used/administered is always lower than the number of doses distributed. It is also important to point out that, according to an article in the November 2011 issue of the well-known and official publication Revue française du Practicien (a French magazine for the medical profession), only 1 to 10% of serious vaccine adverse effects are actually reported and logged (2). The extent of the problem is therefore grossly under-estimated.
The document also mentions no fewer than 37 other deaths of children recorded since the vaccine was launched in 2000, amounting to a minimum total of 73 infant deaths.
We do not of course suggest that all these adverse effects are 100% and without doubt caused by this vaccine. It is however simply not credible to claim that none of these serious adverse effects or deaths were caused by the vaccine, given the fact that in most cases the victims were very young infants, newborns having only just taken their first breath and in perfectly good health prior to receiving the vaccine, and that in each case, there is also a relatively condemning time factor.
What is more, in 2006, a German study published in Vaccine, highlighted an unusually high number of infant deaths within the 48 hours following a hexavalent vaccine (3).
We notice that the number of serious adverse events reported in this confidential document is totally different from the number specified in the GSK data sheet intended for doctors and pharmacists, not to mention the information in the package insert intended for patients. This insert, incidentally, is not automatically handed to the parents by ONE workers who flippantly reassure parents that the only side effects of the vaccine are local such as a mild fever, slight pain or redness at the site of the injection, as specified on pseudo-informative labels which they stick hurriedly into the child’s medical record (4)! As such, both doctors and patients are misinformed and do not receive the necessary guidance to even think of connecting the dots between various ailments and vaccination with Infanrix Hexa, a vaccine potentially administered only a few days or hours beforehand.
What would happen if this list of horrifying adverse effects were available to parents who might then discover in the list exactly the condition just diagnosed in their baby, very recently vaccinated, perhaps in order to be accepted at a nursery?
There is no question that some of them might feel compelled to initiate court cases, given that the manufacturer and the authorities were aware of these risks but simply ran rough-shod over the Belgian law of the 22nd August 2002 on patient rights, particularly its article 8 which specifies that to be able to make a valid informed choice and give their consent, patients (or legal guardians) MUST be provided with and have access to sufficient objective information including on the risks of the treatment offered.
Given all of the above, it is easy to understand GSK’s desire for TOTAL confidentiality (the word ‘confidential’ is stamped on every single page) and we can also realize, sadly, that since the false swine flu ‘pandemic’ and the absolutely scandalous secret contract signed by Minister Onkelinx (5), the Belgian government’s undercover attitude towards these matters has unfortunately not changed.
Another extremely salient aspect is that among the very serious adverse effects recorded by GSK we can see: autism, sudden infant death (SIDS) and ‘child abuse syndrome’ (6).
These are all conditions which the health authorities have always denied to have even the slightest link with vaccines.
If however one reads carefully several of the reports of infant death included in this voluminous GSK tome, it appears that a number of them were reported to the company by national medicine authorities (in France, Italy, etc). It is therefore clear that these authorities and also doctors do acknowledge that it is possible, even probable, that such deaths are linked to this vaccine (7).
So how could the ONE have stated only a few months ago that "as far as nearly all of the medical profession worldwide is concerned, vaccines do not cause serious complications." (8)?
Or how could they repeat that all adverse effects are monitored very carefully and that of course, if there were the slightest worrying signal, the situation would be re-investigated (9)??
It is also important to highlight that according to this document, the number of sudden deaths in children over one year of age, occuring within three days of the Infanrix Hexa injection, exceeded the number expected (10) while, remember: these data only represent between 1 and 10% of the serious adverse events which really took place! Worse still is that GSK is comparing this number of cases registered with a number of sudden deaths which can no longer be considered ‘natural’ or ‘spontaneous’ because today, nearly 100% of infants are vaccinated! If, in spite of this kind of comparison which is already biased from the start, the number of cases reported exceeds the number expected, then it is really time to inform people!
In addition, it is clear from this document that Infanrix Hexa is potentially even more dangerous than the other childhood vaccines.
Lastly, it is incredible to observe that GSK’s criteria for seriousness are all relative: for example, GSK classifies events resulting in neurosurgery, reanimation or removal of part of the intestine as "minor" (11) while this kind of procedure would surely never be considered ‘insignificant’ in a very young child!
We at Initiative Citoyenne feel strongly that there is absolutely no justification for keeping all this incriminatory information away from the public, all the more so given that vaccines are paid for by the taxpayer.
Infanrix Hexa continues to raise far too many questions both in Belgium and throughout the world:
• Why, although the American authorities recommend all the individual vaccines in this hexavalent cocktail, is Infanrix Hexa used in Canada but not in the USA (12)?
• Why are Belgian parents forced, through the selective reimbursal system, to vaccinate their children with Infanrix Hexa in order to be accepted in a nursery when the Hepatitis B vaccine on its own is not mandatory and why is the pentavalent vaccine (without Hep B) available in France but not in Belgium (13)?
• Why have Ministers Onkelinx and Laanan never had the courtesy to reply to our last registered letter asking them why this pentavalent vaccine was not available in Belgium (14)?
• Could it be to favour GSK for whom Infanrix Hexa is a veritable cash cow due to the company’s collection of patents as was openly explained last June by ex-CEO Jean Stéphenne in a video taken at the Cercle du Lac and also re-broadcast on RTBF last October (15)?
• Exactly how many Belgian children have died or continue to suffer from irreversible damage or incurable chronic diseases since this vaccine was introduced in 2004? How exact is the theoretical figure of only "one serious case for every million vaccinations", repeated ad infinitum by ONE in particular?
• Why has the clear listing of multiple sclerosis as a side effect, which appears on all the monovalent Hepatitis B vaccine AND also on the Infanrix Hexa package inserts, mysteriously disappeared from the latest versions of the reference books used by pharmacists?
• What would the results have been if in the pre-launch clinical trials of Infanrix Hexa the children vaccinated with this vaccine had been compared with another group of totally unvaccinated children who had never received a single vaccine in their lives? Would it not have been elementary and much more ethical to conduct this kind of trial BEFORE blindly subjecting all the children in the world to this kind of experimental vaccine?
As a citizens’ watchdog, we demand that an urgent and in-depth enquiry be conducted into this vaccine, its effects and the real reasons behind its virtual imposition on all Belgian parents. It seems quite clear that once again, the reasons have less to do with ‘the comfort of the infant’ (‘one less jab’) and public health than with the business of the vaccine manufacturers and whatever other forms of intimidation and coercion are being used.
Initiative Citoyenne Watchdog
References :
(1) http://ddata.over-blog.com/3/27/09/71/2012-2013/confid.pdf
(2)http://ddata.over-blog.com/3/27/09/71/2012-2013/Pharmacovigilance-vaccins-
Jonville-Bera--Revue-du-Praticien.pdf
(3) Zinka, B.; Rauch, E.; Buettner, A.; Ruëff, F.; Penning, R. Unexplained cases of
sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination. Vaccine 2006, 24, 5779–5780.
(4) http://www.initiativecitoyenne.be/article-les-medecins-face-aux-vaccins-veritablesacteurs-
de-sante-ou-simples-marionnettes-79088869.html
(5) http://ddata.over-blog.com/3/27/09/71/GSK_contrat_22_07_2009.pdf
(6) cfr pages 15,19 and 24
(7) cfr pages 657, 659, 662, 681, 1225, 1234, 1263, 1268
(8)http://www.rtbf.be/info/societe/detail_deces-d-un-bebe-a-charleroi-l-one-tient-a-sedefendre?
id=7172703
(9)http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xqmgyi_belgique-debat-autour-de-la-vaccinationobligatoire_
webcam
(10) cfr pages 249 and 783.
(11) cfr pages 30 and 31
(12)http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm09383
3.htm
(13) http://www.hcsp.fr/docspdf/avisrapports/hcspa20111213_defoblvacadinde.pdf
(14)http://www.initiativecitoyenne.be/pages/Courrier_a_Laanan_amp_Onkelinx_sur_le_f
orcing_vaccinal_via_le_remboursement_selectif_de_vaccins-8273178.html
(15) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuxpBJ9wNng&feature=plcp


Subject: Deaths and Adverse Effects from many Vaccines are kept CONFIDENTIAL. WHY?

Deaths and Adverse Effects from many Vaccines are kept CONFIDENTIAL. WHY?
Cdsapi’s Added Comment: The vaccine programs to which today’s infants are being subjected, often at time of birth, containing ever more multiple disease challenges in one shot, consisting of a cocktail of very toxic adjuvants, preservatives, genetically engineered DNA fragments and a host of unidentified and unidentifiable “run-along substances and pathogens” constitute a mass-experiment travesty in which these infants are really being used as experimental lab rats and guinea pigs, subjected to mass experiments that are using unsafe, untested products that present one of the most serious dangers that these children will ever face.
Worse still, it is being mandated as government Health Policy – in the name of prevention.
The manufacturers have been granted total immunity, and are not accountable for any liability. What a wonderful business arrangement!
The taxpayers pay the bill for it all – for the original vaccinations and for the health costs of the devastating aftermath.
The parents are being kept in the dark and are fed coercive “fear-mongering propaganda”,
and all the while, the “ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES” are kept under wraps, kept as secret as possible, not reported in the professional literature, not reported to the government agencies. no warning to the parents, not released to the media - all to protect the corporations and the “profits of a trillion-plus dollar industry”.
First, what idiot mentality came up with the notion that it is safe to shoot many multiple diseases simultaneously into the blood system of a newborn infant - and call it “protection”.
When some kids “don’t make it”, are they just considered collateral damage that is “acceptable” in the Risk/Benefit equation of “the Greater Good for the Greater Number”?
Are parents being told that some of their kids may be “sacrificed” for “the benefit of the herd”?
Are parents being told that their kids are being used as “test subjects” for new vaccines and multiple vaccine combinations that are hitting the marketplace on “fast track”?
Or is it all just one big, very profitable, mass experiment - and the kids are the lab-rats.
Where is the authenticated science? Or is it all “Science by Declaration and Decree”
Why are BC infants still being subjected to this vaccine, given the evidence of harm?
Who is protecting the children????? Obviously, NO ONE!
When you read the following report, you can stop wondering why ever more parents are no longer willing to march their children down the path that leads to the altar of the “vaccine religion”.
-------------------------------------------


GSK's Infanrix vaccine cocktail was linked to over 800 types of adverse reactions - over 800 in Belgium babies.
Bear in mind, that when it states that 36 babies died, that officialdom admits that only 1-10% of reactions ever get reported. So most don’t.
Now get this... This GSK vaccine is not used in the U.S., nor in any other place in Canada, except B.C. So is B.C. being used as a testing ground as this article suggests?
http://vran.org/wp-content/uploads/Initiative-Citoyenne-Press-Release-Infanrix-Hexa-6-12-12.pdf
-----------------------------------------
Report:
http://vran.org/wp-content/uploads/Initiative-Citoyenne-Press-Release-Infanrix-Hexa-6-12-12.pdf

Safety of the Infanrix Hexa Vaccine: Confidential Document from GSK to the Authorities
We seem to have acquired a 1,271-page confidential GSK document, ordinarily reserved for the authorities.
Topic: the pharmacovigilance of the Infanrix Hexa (6-in-1) paediatric vaccine. (1)
The Infanrix Hexa vaccine is a “free” inoculation administered to almost all the infants in Belgium, mainly through the ONE (Office de la Naissance et de l’Enfance = Office for Childbirth and Childhood) but also through paediatricians and general practitioners. It is intended to protect newborns and infants from six different illnesses: Diphtheria, Tetanus, Whooping Cough, Polio, Haemophilius Influenza B (HIB) and Hepatitis B.
The document in question details the adverse effects of this vaccine, reported back to the manufacturer from various European countries between the 23rd of October 2009 and the 22nd of October 2011.
We can understand why it is confidential: no less than 825 different types of complication and adverse effect are mentioned.
It is important, first of all, to point out that the list covers a very broad range of adverse effects potentially involving each and every system and organ in the body: the blood, the cardiovascular system, the nervous system, the immune system, the lungs, the skin but also the sensory organs (sight, hearing…), the musculoskeletal system, the joints, the urinary system, the digestive system and the endocrine system.
During this specific period of time, GSK received 1,742 reports of adverse effects, of which 503 were serious effects not listed and 56 were serious adverse effects listed.
The events registered included 36 deaths (over the two-years period), most of which occurred within three days after the child received the Infanrix Hexa vaccine.
According to GSK, the adverse effect notification rate was 14.6 per 100,000 doses distributed but don’t forget that the number of doses actually used/administered is always lower than the number of doses distributed. It is also important to point out that, according to an article in the November 2011 issue of the well-known and official publication Revue française du Practicien (a French magazine for the medical profession), only 1 to 10% of serious vaccine adverse effects are actually reported and logged (2). The extent of the problem is therefore grossly under-estimated.
The document also mentions no fewer than 37 other deaths of children recorded since the vaccine was launched in 2000, amounting to a minimum total of 73 infant deaths.
We do not of course suggest that all these adverse effects are 100% and without doubt caused by this vaccine. It is however simply not credible to claim that none of these serious adverse effects or deaths were caused by the vaccine, given the fact that in most cases the victims were very young infants, newborns having only just taken their first breath and in perfectly good health prior to receiving the vaccine, and that in each case, there is also a relatively condemning time factor.
What is more, in 2006, a German study published in Vaccine, highlighted an unusually high number of infant deaths within the 48 hours following a hexavalent vaccine (3).
We notice that the number of serious adverse events reported in this confidential document is totally different from the number specified in the GSK data sheet intended for doctors and pharmacists, not to mention the information in the package insert intended for patients. This insert, incidentally, is not automatically handed to the parents by ONE workers who flippantly reassure parents that the only side effects of the vaccine are local such as a mild fever, slight pain or redness at the site of the injection, as specified on pseudo-informative labels which they stick hurriedly into the child’s medical record (4)! As such, both doctors and patients are misinformed and do not receive the necessary guidance to even think of connecting the dots between various ailments and vaccination with Infanrix Hexa, a vaccine potentially administered only a few days or hours beforehand.
What would happen if this list of horrifying adverse effects were available to parents who might then discover in the list exactly the condition just diagnosed in their baby, very recently vaccinated, perhaps in order to be accepted at a nursery?
There is no question that some of them might feel compelled to initiate court cases, given that the manufacturer and the authorities were aware of these risks but simply ran rough-shod over the Belgian law of the 22nd August 2002 on patient rights, particularly its article 8 which specifies that to be able to make a valid informed choice and give their consent, patients (or legal guardians) MUST be provided with and have access to sufficient objective information including on the risks of the treatment offered.
Given all of the above, it is easy to understand GSK’s desire for TOTAL confidentiality (the word ‘confidential’ is stamped on every single page) and we can also realize, sadly, that since the false swine flu ‘pandemic’ and the absolutely scandalous secret contract signed by Minister Onkelinx (5), the Belgian government’s undercover attitude towards these matters has unfortunately not changed.
Another extremely salient aspect is that among the very serious adverse effects recorded by GSK we can see: autism, sudden infant death (SIDS) and ‘child abuse syndrome’ (6).
These are all conditions which the health authorities have always denied to have even the slightest link with vaccines.
If however one reads carefully several of the reports of infant death included in this voluminous GSK tome, it appears that a number of them were reported to the company by national medicine authorities (in France, Italy, etc). It is therefore clear that these authorities and also doctors do acknowledge that it is possible, even probable, that such deaths are linked to this vaccine (7).
So how could the ONE have stated only a few months ago that “as far as nearly all of the medical profession worldwide is concerned, vaccines do not cause serious complications.” (8)?
Or how could they repeat that all adverse effects are monitored very carefully and that of course, if there were the slightest worrying signal, the situation would be re-investigated (9)??
It is also important to highlight that according to this document, the number of sudden
deaths in children over one year of age, occuring within three days of the Infanrix Hexa injection, exceeded the number expected (10) while, remember: these data only represent between 1 and 10% of the serious adverse events which really took place! Worse still is that GSK is comparing this number of cases registered with a number of sudden deaths which can no longer be considered ‘natural’ or ‘spontaneous’ because today, nearly 100% of infants are vaccinated! If, in spite of this kind of comparison which is already biased from the start, the number of cases reported exceeds the number expected, then it is really time to inform people!
In addition, it is clear from this document that Infanrix Hexa is potentially even more dangerous than the other childhood vaccines.
Lastly, it is incredible to observe that GSK’s criteria for seriousness are all relative: for example, GSK classifies events resulting in neurosurgery, reanimation or removal of part of the intestine as “minor” (11) while this kind of procedure would surely never be considered ‘insignificant’ in a very young child!
We at Initiative Citoyenne feel strongly that there is absolutely no justification for keeping all this incriminatory information away from the public, all the more so given that vaccines are paid for by the taxpayer.
Infanrix Hexa continues to raise far too many questions both in Belgium and throughout the world:
• Why, although the American authorities recommend all the individual vaccines in this hexavalent cocktail, is Infanrix Hexa used in Canada but not in the USA (12)?
• Why are Belgian parents forced, through the selective reimbursal system, to vaccinate their children with Infanrix Hexa in order to be accepted in a nursery when the Hepatitis B vaccine on its own is not mandatory and why is the pentavalent vaccine (without Hep B) available in France but not in Belgium (13)?
• Why have Ministers Onkelinx and Laanan never had the courtesy to reply to our last registered letter asking them why this pentavalent vaccine was not available in Belgium (14)?
• Could it be to favour GSK for whom Infanrix Hexa is a veritable cash cow due to the company’s collection of patents as was openly explained last June by ex-CEO Jean Stéphenne in a video taken at the Cercle du Lac and also re-broadcast on RTBF last October (15)?
• Exactly how many Belgian children have died or continue to suffer from irreversible damage or incurable chronic diseases since this vaccine was introduced in 2004? How exact is the theoretical figure of only “one serious case for every million vaccinations”, repeated ad infinitum by ONE in particular?
• Why has the clear listing of multiple sclerosis as a side effect, which appears on all the monovalent Hepatitis B vaccine AND also on the Infanrix Hexa package inserts, mysteriously disappeared from the latest versions of the reference books used by pharmacists?
• What would the results have been if in the pre-launch clinical trials of Infanrix Hexa the children vaccinated with this vaccine had been compared with another group of totally unvaccinated children who had never received a single vaccine in their lives? Would it not have been elementary and much more ethical to conduct this kind of trial BEFORE blindly subjecting all the children in the world to this kind of experimental vaccine?
As a citizens’ watchdog, we demand that an urgent and in-depth enquiry be conducted into this vaccine, its effects and the real reasons behind its virtual imposition on all Belgian parents. It seems quite clear that once again, the reasons have less to do with ‘the comfort of the infant’ (‘one less jab’) and public health than with the business of the vaccine manufacturers and whatever other forms of intimidation and coercion are being used.
Initiative Citoyenne Watchdog
References :
(1) http://ddata.over-blog.com/3/27/09/71/2012-2013/confid.pdf
(2)http://ddata.over-blog.com/3/27/09/71/2012-2013/Pharmacovigilance-vaccins-
Jonville-Bera--Revue-du-Praticien.pdf
(3) Zinka, B.; Rauch, E.; Buettner, A.; Ruëff, F.; Penning, R. Unexplained cases of
sudden infant death shortly after hexavalent vaccination. Vaccine 2006, 24, 5779–5780.
(4) http://www.initiativecitoyenne.be/article-les-medecins-face-aux-vaccins-veritablesacteurs-
de-sante-ou-simples-marionnettes-79088869.html
(5) http://ddata.over-blog.com/3/27/09/71/GSK_contrat_22_07_2009.pdf
(6) cfr pages 15,19 and 24
(7) cfr pages 657, 659, 662, 681, 1225, 1234, 1263, 1268
(8)http://www.rtbf.be/info/societe/detail_deces-d-un-bebe-a-charleroi-l-one-tient-a-sedefendre?
id=7172703
(9)http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xqmgyi_belgique-debat-autour-de-la-vaccinationobligatoire_
webcam
(10) cfr pages 249 and 783.
(11) cfr pages 30 and 31
(12)http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm09383
3.htm
(13) http://www.hcsp.fr/docspdf/avisrapports/hcspa20111213_defoblvacadinde.pdf
(14)http://www.initiativecitoyenne.be/pages/Courrier_a_Laanan_amp_Onkelinx_sur_le_f
orcing_vaccinal_via_le_remboursement_selectif_de_vaccins-8273178.html
(15) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TuxpBJ9wNng&feature=plcp


Share/Bookmark
...............................................................................................................

This site is owned and operated by PreventDisease.com © 1999-2017. All Rights Reserved. All content on this site may be copied, without permission, whether reproduced digitally or in print, provided copyright, reference and source information are intact and use is strictly for not-for-profit purposes. Please review our copyright policy for full details.
aaa
Interact
volunteerDonateWrite For Us
Stay Connected With Our Newsletter