How Geoengineering And The Aerosol Spraying Of Our Skies Affects
governments and scientists worldwide have been denying the existence
of discreet operations which (for various reasons) use military
aircrafts to spray our skies with chemical toxins. Such operations
have often been dismissed as conspiracy theories, or in many
cases a misinterpretation of condenstation trails (contrails).
Goverments are now finally admitting that geoengineering is
a reality and have stated that despite any detrimental affects
to our health, will continue these operations indefinitely.
been called chemtrails, aerial spraying, aerosol emissions,
cirrus clouds, among many other terms. The largest reports come
from Canada and U.S. but it happens all over the world including
countries such as France, Germany, New Zealand, Australia, the
United Kingdom among many others. If you live in these countries,
just look above you as you'll see them at some point throughout
day or week. Often these jets leave just a thick wisp of a trail
or they leave a long line of dashed trails across the whole
sky. Are they turning their engines off and on? And so frequently?
And why the "X's" which have been observed and documented
all over the world? There are thousands of photos on the web
of these patterns.
laws in almost every nation on earth do not allow commercial
aircraft to cross flight paths so close and so quickly. These
jets are therefore under military control. And what about
the prismatic colors often observed in the resultant aerosol
haze illuminated by sunlight?
haze was primarily water vapor, carbon monoxide and negligible
amounts of hydrocarbons, the prismatic colors would essentially
be that of a rainbow. But, instead it is either magenta and
green or broad bands of orange and yellow. All elements through
which sunlight passes give a signature color which is totally
unique to that element. Through spectroscopy a number of heavy
metals have been shown to be ever-present in our breathable
atmosphere. All heavy metals, as you may know, cause the dementia
symptoms associated with Alzheimer's Syndrome.
which is now well documented according to researchers, is to
manipulate the weather. Karsten Brandt, German meteorologist
states, "The Federal Army is Manipulating the Meteorological
of radar signals is the main purpose theorizes Mr. Brandt in
the interview. "I was surprised that this artificial cloud
was so wide-spread. The radar images are stunning considering
the needed tons of dispersed elements - although, the federal
army claims that only small amounts of material were propagated.
The military heads claim that the substances used are not harmful."
Remmel, German Green party representative states, "The
government must provide explanations to the unsuspecting population."
While radar is tracking suspicious aircraft, the Germany Military
then uses counterfeit satellite imagery to hide their operations.
are so widespread across the world, it is easy to rule out the
idea that this is just military performing operations to disrupt
radar signals as part of some sort of drill.
of these operations in the United States appears to be the US
Navy, as detailed in "Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism
& Toxic Warfare," by Dr. Len Horowitz. Many government
watchdogs claim global depopulation, the targeted reduction
of the world's population by two-thirds, is secretly the reason
behind chemtrail spraying.
differ from ordinary contrails in that they hang in the sky
for hours and are often observed to be emitted from planes that
fly criss-cross routes, leading to the formation of X
and grid-like patterns in the sky. Chemtrails also directly
effect localized weather by turning a clear blue sky into a
news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth
from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium
(6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other
chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and
silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while
several are rarely or never found in nature. The newscast focuses
on Barium, which its research shows is a hallmark of chemtrails.
KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or more
than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.
asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, about
the effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan commented that
short term exposure can lead to anything from stomach
to chest pains and that long term exposure causes blood pressure
problems. The Poison Control Center further reported that
long-term exposure, as with any harmful substance, would contribute
to weakening the immune system, which many speculate is the
purpose of such man-made chemical trails.
barium oxide has cropped up repeatedly as a contaminant from
suspected geoengineering experimentation.
Barium causes asthma, which has reached epidemic proportions
across the world. It is also a powerful immune suppressant.
In the barium mines the workers all have what's called baritosis,
a special type of asthma, which surprisingly is worse on the
weekend when they're not in the mines working. It gets better
when they return to work. Did you also realize that we have
a flu season every year and that it can last over 8 to 9 months?
The incidence of allergies have risen so much that pharmaceutical
companies' profits have tripled on their allergy medications
and it can only be coincidence that those rise in profits also
mirror the rise in aerosol operations which began in earnest
in the fall of 1998.
Modification may adversely impact agricultural crops and water
supplies. If the weather is changed in one state, region or
county it may have severe consequences in another region,
state or county. And who is going to decide the type of weather
modification experimentation and who it will benefit or adversely
Artificial weather modification can impact all of us by reducing
water supplies, changing agricultural crop production cycles,
reducing crop production, and water availability. Since most
experimental weather modification programs use chemicals released
into the atmosphere the public could be subjected increasingly
toxic or unknown substances that could adversely impact agricultural
crops and trees.
dimming and persistent chemtrails that produce man-made clouds
may have serious impacts on crop production. A recent corn crop
study in Illinois shows that cloud cover reduces corn crop production
while direct sunlight increases production. In addition, increasing
man-made clouds may reduce the effectiveness of solar panels.
Smolin, an Avian Bird Flu expert, noted on the Ron Owens Show
on KGO Radio (January 5, 2006), that the flu was spread more
quickly in the winter when there was a "lack of sunlight". Would
man-made clouds be contributing to the lack of sunlight which
might cause the Avian Bird flu to spread more quickly at other
times of the year? Experimental weather modification programs
could also exacerbate this problem by changing climate patterns
and our weather.
Rosalind Peterson, lifelong California resident, was invited
by to address the United Nations Conference during both a workshop,
held on September 5th, and a round-table session, held on September
6, 2007. Rosalind was invited to address this conference due
to her research and work in the agriculture field relating to
climate change, global dimming, and the affects of man-made
clouds and experimental weather modification programs on agriculture.
Rosalind is co-founder and President of the Agriculture Defense
Coalition. Excerpts of her speech included the following:
International weather modification companies are modifying our
weather with programs that cover thousands of square miles.
Most of these programs use toxic chemicals or particulates to
alter the weather with either ground-based or airborne releases
that change or modify our local micro-climates.
One of the things I am concerned about and that we need to address,
now and in the future, is how these programs are affecting the
micro-climates needed for our crops to survive and for pollination
to take place.
If we artificially change the growing seasons, our pollinators
like bees and birds (many now in sharp decline across the United
States), may not survive, leaving many flowers, native plants,
agricultural and trees crops that are not pollinated. Native
grasses, plants, trees, and agricultural losses could be devastated
not only in the United States but on a worldwide basis.
The "mitigation" drumbeat heard everywhere sounds impressive.
However, these undefined measures may be detrimental to human
health, crop production, soils, and drinking water supplies.
It is now necessary to define what is meant by mitigation and
to place all of these measures under congressional, agriculture,
and pubic oversight. We do not want to place ourselves in the
position of making huge mistakes by trading one pollution problem
for another more serious problem.
example reflects a "monetary mitigation" agreement that allows
polluters to purchase the ability to pollute more: (SF Chronicle
- September 2007 - California makes deal with ConocoPhillips
so that it can expand its refinery in the San Francisco Bay
Area while paying the State of California $10 Million total
so that it can release an additional 500,000 tons of pollutants
from their Rodeo, CA, facility. In addition, their proposed
expansion agreement would add one million tons a year of carbon
dioxide from another facility that currently releases yearly
1.9 millions tons a year.
also increases the amounts of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide,
soot and other pollutants that will be emitted when the facility
expansion is completed.
Geoengineering schemes, many developed to place chemicals, salt
or other particulates into our atmosphere to control global
warming, are waiting in the wings to be implemented or have
already been implemented. The release of chemicals or particulates,
like highly polluting sulfur, are now being discussed at NASA
Ames (November 2006 Geoengineering Meetings), and by many scientists
worldwide waiting in the wings for funding.
and particulates are being proposed so that the amount of direct
sunlight reaching the earth is reduced in order to cool the
planet. What is not being discussed, for example, is that California
in 2006, took highly polluting sulfur out of diesel fuel due
to asthma and other environmental problems. Now there are proposals
to place sulfur back into our atmosphere to reduce global warming.
the discussion about environmental, agriculture, and human health
declines from this proposal? What about public and congressional
oversight of these proposed programs? No public oversight, hearings
or regulations are being proposed that would protect agriculture
or public heath. The actions of placing chemicals into our atmosphere
is certainly going to have negative effects on crop production
and tree health. And if you place in our skies chemicals to
reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the earth, you are going
to reduce the photosynthesis needed for crop production.
to produce crops and for plants and trees to grow and thrive
they need direct sunlight. A recent corn crop study at the University
of Illinois shows that increased cloud cover reduces corn crop
production while direct sunlight increases production. Photosynthesis
is the process where plants and trees gain the energy to grow
and produce crops.
If we "mitigate"
to reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the earth, negatively
affecting crop production not only in the United States but
worldwide, we could put the world in a food shortage crisis.
are now believed to be reducing crop production in the United
shifts caused by experimental weather modification programs
of photosynthesis cause by persistent jet contrails that produce
(according to NASA), man-made clouds that change our climate.
(Solar voltaic panels are beginning to produce less power
due to these experiments.)
NASA noted in an October 2005 newsletter, and from other study
results, notes that increasingly persistent contrails are turning
into man-made clouds that are ".trapping warmth in the atmosphere
and exacerbating global warming." NASA goes on to note that:
".Any increase in global cloud cover will contribute to long-term
changes in Earth's climate. Likewise, any change in Earth's
climate may have effects on natural resources." (The Power Point
Presentation begins at this point in Rosalind's presentation.)
persistent jet contrails are changing our climate to the degree
that one jet leaving a persistent jet contrail has the following
affect according to NASA's Patrick Minnis (February 2007): ".We
had found that (jet) contrails were producing much more cloud
cover than we ever thought they did. This one particular aircraft
produced a contrail that covered an area of four thousand square
kilometers and lingered for six hours. But we also found that
there were contrails covering much larger areas and lasting
more than twenty hours."
Evans, Atmospheric Scientist: ".You see the two contrails forming.cirrus
clouds. While most natural clouds actually reflect more sunlight
back into space than they supply infrared heat energy towards
the earth. However, cirrus clouds are different. They actually
radiate more heat energy than they reflect solar energy back
into space. Therefore, cirrus clouds contribute to global warming."
up on the screen shows just one jet leaving a persistent jet
contrail - that one trail can expand to cover an area of four
thousand square kilometers and linger for more than twenty hours.
This phenomenon was unheard of in the early fifties, sixties
and seventies. It was not until the late 1980s that there was
a huge change and people began to see the first persistent jet
contrails that persist like we see today on a massive scale.
show that climate change and global warming problems could be
attributed to these types of persistent jet contrails and that
jets cause them to form in our once clear blue skies. One of
the issues needed to be addressed as we go forward is: "HOW
DO YOU LIKE YOUR SKIES.NATURAL OR MAN-MADE?" And right now we
are making manmade clouds like the ones you see up on the screen.
And these man-made clouds are trapping warmth in our atmosphere.
Isn't it time that all of us addressed this global warming issue?
Atmospheric Heating and Testing Programs
There are also other experiments taking place in our atmosphere.
The colors in this man-made cloud photograph in Mendocino County,
CA, shows just one of many experiments. These colors represent
a chemical reaction produced by experiments conducted by NASA
and the United States Air Force. They are sending up canisters
loaded with toxic chemicals designed to explode when superheated
in order to conduct atmospheric and ionosphere experimental
jet contrails and man-made clouds, I believe, allow scientists
to observe the results of these tests from either satellites
or ground-based observation platforms. Without man-made clouds
these tests could not be observed, as the chemicals would not
produce a visible marker.
NASA / U.S. Air Force CRESS 1990 Press Kit outlines an atmospheric
NASA testing program (linked to H.A.A.R.P. and the U.S. Air
Force, that could produce 4 the Vibrant Spectrums (auroras),
referenced above, as shown in my poster pictures. In this program
canisters are loaded with chemicals and superheated at different
atmospheric levels. These canisters contain the following chemicals
that could be polluting our air and are showing up with unusual
spikes in drinking water supplies in across California (California
State Department of Health, Drinking Water Division Water Test
Results- Public Records, Sacramento, California), and Arizona:
notes published in May 2008 from the Council of Foreign Relations
Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering, the
elite internationalist group lays out the exact same radical
ideas now being touted by the Obama administration.
excerpts are taken from the document:
Among all geoengineering schemes, those currently considered
most feasible involve increasing the planetary albedo, that
is, reflecting more sunlight back into space before it can be
absorbed. There are a number of different methods that could
be used to increase the planets reflectivity:
1. Add more small reflecting particles in the upper part
of the atmosphere (the stratosphere which is located between
15 and 50 kilometers above the Earths surface).
2. Add more clouds in the lower part of the atmosphere
3. Place various kinds of reflecting objects in space either
near the earth or at a stable location between the earth and
4. Change large portions of the planets land cover
from things that are dark (absorbing) such as trees to things
that are light (reflecting) such as open snowcover or grasses.
Stratospheric Aerosols that might be engineered to migrate
to particular regions (e.g. over the arctic) or to rise above
the stratospher (so as not to interfere in stratospheric chemistry).
Adding more of the right kind of fine particles to the stratosphere
can increase the amount of sunlight that is reflected back into
Applied to geoengineering, various technologies could be
used to loft particles into the stratosphere, such as naval
guns, rockets, hot air balloons or blimps, or a fleet of highflying
aircraft. Potential types of particles for injection include
sulfur dioxide, aluminum oxide dust or even designer self-levitating
An valuable file folder is available containing
8 PDF's, all published by the CFR, and all concerning their
An excellent new video summarizing concerns about
chemtrails entitled Geoengineering and Eugenics has
just been released by Media Rival Productions. This footage
shows huge windowless airplanes dispersing chemtrails, as well
as aircraft that appear to turn chemtrail emissions on and off
in mid-flight. The fact that something is being deliberately
dispersed is clear from the video and cannot be confused with
crop-dusting which is done by light aircraft at low altitudes.