Since the flu pandemic
was declared, there have been several so-called "vaccine
experts" coming out of the wood work attempting to justify
the effectiveness of vaccines. All of them parrot the same ridiculous
historical and pseudoscientific perspectives of vaccinations which
are easily squelched with the following 9 questions.
Claim: The study of vaccines,
their historical record of achievements, effectiveness, safety
and mechanism in humans are well understood and proven in scientific
and medical circles.
Fact: The claim is completely false.
1. What to ask: Could you
please provide one double-blind, placebo-controlled study that
can prove the safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
2. What to ask: Could you
please provide scientific evidence on ANY study which can confirm
the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccines?
3. What to ask: Could you
please provide scientific evidence which can prove that disease
reduction in any part of the world, at any point in history was
attributable to inoculation of populations?
4. What to ask: Could you
please explain how the safety and mechanism of vaccines in the
human body are scientifically proven if their pharmacokinetics
(the study of bodily absorption, distribution, metabolism and
excretion of ingredients) are never examined
or analyzed in any vaccine study?
One of the most critical elements which defines the toxicity potential
of any vaccine are its pharmacokinetic properties. Drug companies
and health agencies refuse to consider the study, analysis or
evaluation of the pharmacokinetic properties of any vaccine.
There is not one double-blind, placebo-controlled study in the
history of vaccine development that has ever proven their safety,
effectiveness or achievements (unless those achievements have
underlined their damage to human health).
There are also no controlled studies completed in any country
which have objectively proven that vaccines have had any direct
or consequential effect on the reduction of any type of disease
in any
part of the world.
Every single study that has ever attempted to validate the safety
and effectiveness of vaccines has conclusively established carcinogenic,
mutagenic, neurotoxic or fertility impairments, but they won't
address those.
Claim: Preservatives and chemical
additives used in the manufacture of vaccines are safe and no
studies have been linked or proven them unsafe for use in humans.
Fact: The claim is completely
false.
5. What to ask: Could you
please provide scientific justification as to how injecting a
human being with a confirmed neurotoxin is beneficial to human
health and prevents disease?
6. What to ask: Can you provide
a risk/benefit profile on how the benefits of injecting a known
neurotoxin exceeds its risks to human health for the intended
goal of preventing disease?
This issue is no longer even open to debate. It is a scientifically
established fact in literally hundreds of studies that the preservatives
and chemical additives in vaccines damage cells. Neurotoxicity,
immune suppression, immune-mediated chronic inflammation and carcinogenic
proliferation are just a few of several effects that have been
observed on the human body. See
a list of chemicals in vaccines
Fortunately, the drug companies still tell us the damage vaccines
have on the human body. People just don't read them. All you have
to do is look at the insert for any vaccine, and it will detail
the exact
ingredients, alerts and potentially lethal effects.
Any medical professional who believes that it is justified to
inject any type of neurotoxin into any person to prevent any disease
is completely misguided, misinformed, deluded and ignorant of
any logic regarding human health.
Claim: Once an individual
is injected with the foreign antigen in the vaccine, that individual
becomes immune to future infections.
Fact: The claim is completely
false.
7. What to ask:Could
you please provide scientific justification on how bypassing the
respiratory tract (or mucous membrane) is advantageous and how
directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream enhances immune
functioning and prevents future infections?
8. What to ask: Could
you please provide scientific justification on how a vaccine would
prevent viruses from mutating?
9. What to ask: Could
you please provide scientific justification as to how a vaccination
can target a virus in an infected individual who does not have
the exact viral configuration or strain the vaccine was developed
for?
All promoters of vaccination fail to realize that the respiratory
tract of humans (actually all mammals) contains antibodies which
initiates natural immune responses within the respiratory tract
mucosa. Bypassing this mucosal aspect of the immune system by
directly injecting viruses into the bloodstream leads to a corruption
in the immune system itself. As a result, the pathogenic viruses
or bacteria cannot be eliminated by the immune system and remain
in the body, where they will further grow and/or mutate as the
individual is exposed to ever more antigens and toxins in the
environment which continue to assault the immune system.
Despite the injection of any type of vaccine, viruses continue
circulating through the body, mutating and transforming into other
organisms. The ability of a vaccine manufacturer to target the
exact viral strain without knowing its mutagenic properties is
equivalent to shooting a gun at a fixed target that has already
been moved from its location. You would be shooting at what was,
not what is!
Flu viruses, may mutate, change or adapt several times over a
period of one flu season, making the seasonal influenza vaccine
100% redundant and ineffective every single flu season. Ironically,
the natural immune defenses of the human body can target these
changes but the vaccines cannot.
I have never encountered one pro-vaccine advocate, whether medically
or scientifically qualified, who could answer even 1 let alone
all 9 of these questions. One or all of the following will happen
when debating any of the above questions:
- They will concede defeat and admit they are stumped
- They will attempt to discredit unrelated issues that do not
pertain to the question.
- They will formulate their response and rebuttal based on historical
arguments and scientific studies which have been disproved over
and over again.
Not one pro-vaccine advocate will ever directly address these
questions in an open mainstream venue.
Flu Vaccine Exposed: Think Twice!
Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in
vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to
treatment.
