| Forced Vaccinations, Government,
and the Public Interest
Those who are observant have noticed a dangerous trend in the
United States, as well as worldwide, and that is the resorting
of various governments at different levels to mandating forced
vaccination upon the public at large.
My State of Mississippi has one of the most-restrictive vaccine-exemption
laws in the United States, where exemptions are allowed only upon
medical recommendation. Ironically, this is only on paper, as
many have had as many as three physicians, some experts in neurological
damage caused by vaccines, provide written calls for exemption,
only to be turned down by the State’s public-health officer.
Worse are the States, such as Massachusetts, New Jersey and Maryland,
where forced vaccinations have either been mandated by the courts,
the state legislature, or have such legislation pending. All of
such policies strongly resemble those policies found in National
Socialist empires, Stalinist countries, or Communist China.
When public-health officers are asked for the legal justification
for such draconian measures as forcing people to accept vaccines
that they deem either a clear and present danger to themselves
and their loved ones or have had personal experience with serious
adverse reactions to such vaccines, they usually resort to the
need to protect the public.
One quickly concludes that if the vaccines are as effective as
being touted by the public-health officials, then why should one
fear the unvaccinated? Obviously the vaccinated would have at
least 95% protection. This question puts them in a very difficult
position. Their usual response is that a “small” percentage
of the vaccinated will not have sufficient protection and would
still be at risk. Now, if they admit what the literature shows,
that vaccine failure rates are much higher than the 5% they claim,
they must face the next obvious question – then why should
anyone take the vaccine if there is a significant chance it will
not protect?
When pressed further, they then resort to their favorite justification,
the Holy Grail of the vaccine proponents – herd immunity.
This concept is based upon the idea that 95% (and some now say
100%) of the population must be vaccinated to prevent an epidemic.
The percentages needing vaccination grows progressively. I pondered
this question for some time before the answer hit me. Herd immunity
is mostly a myth and applies only to natural immunity – that
is, contracting the infection itself.
Is Herd Immunity Real?
In the original description of herd immunity, the protection
to the population at large occurred only if people contracted
the infections naturally. The reason for this is that naturally-acquired
immunity lasts for a lifetime. The vaccine proponents quickly
latched onto this concept and applied it to vaccine-induced immunity.
But, there was one major problem – vaccine-induced immunity
lasted for only a relatively short period, from 2 to 10 years
at most, and then this applies only to humoral immunity. This
is why they began, silently, to suggest boosters for most vaccines,
even the common childhood infections such as chickenpox, measles,
mumps, and rubella.
Then they discovered an even greater problem, the boosters were
lasting for only 2 years or less. This is why we are now seeing
mandates that youth entering colleges have multiple vaccines,
even those which they insisted gave lifelong immunity, such as
the MMR. The same is being suggested for full-grown adults. Ironically,
no one in the media or medical field is asking what is going on.
They just accept that it must be done.
That vaccine-induced herd immunity is mostly myth can be proven
quite simply. When I was in medical school, we were taught that
all of the childhood vaccines lasted a lifetime. This thinking
existed for over 70 years. It was not until relatively recently
that it was discovered that most of these vaccines lost their
effectiveness 2 to 10 years after being given. What this means
is that at least half the population, that is the baby boomers,
have had no vaccine-induced immunity against any of these diseases
for which they had been vaccinated very early in life. In essence,
at least 50% or more of the population was unprotected for decades.
If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent
massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%.
Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or
less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd
immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and
no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity
is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other
medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.
When we examine the scientific literature, we find that for many
of the vaccines protective immunity was 30 to 40%, meaning that
70% to 60% of the public has been without vaccine protection.
Again, this would mean that with a 30% to 40% vaccine-effectiveness
rate combined with the fact that most people lost their immune
protection within 2 to 10 year of being vaccinated, most of us
were without the magical 95% number needed for herd immunity.
This is why vaccine defenders insist the vaccines have 95% effectiveness
rates.
Without the mantra of herd immunity, these public-health officials
would not be able to justify forced mass vaccinations. I usually
give the physicians who question my statement that herd immunity
is a myth a simple example. When I was a medical student almost
40 years ago, it was taught that the tetanus vaccine would last
a lifetime. Then 30 years after it had been mandated, we discovered
that its protection lasted no more than 10 years. Then, I ask
my doubting physician if he or she has ever seen a case of tetanus?
Most have not. I then tell them to look at the yearly data on
tetanus infections – one sees no rise in tetanus cases. The
same can be said for measles, mumps, and other childhood infections.
It was, and still is, all a myth.
The entire case for forced mass vaccination rest upon this myth
and it is important that we demonstrate the falsity of this idea.
Neil Z. Miller, in his latest book The Vaccine Information Manual,
provides compelling evidence that herd immunity is a myth.
The Road to Hell is Paved with Good Intentions
Those pushing mandatory vaccination for an ever-growing list
of diseases are a mixed bag. Some are quite sincere and truly
want to improve the health of the United States. They believe
the vaccine-induced herd immunity myth and likewise believe that
vaccines are basically effective and safe. These are not the evil
people.
A growing number are made of those with a collectivist worldview
and see themselves as a core of elite wise men and women who should
tell the rest of us what we should do in all aspects of our lives.
They see us as ignorant cattle, who are unable to understand the
virtues of their plan for America and the World. Like children,
we must be made to take our medicine – since, in their view,
we have no concept of the true benefit of the bad-tasting medicine
we are to be fed.
I have also found that a small number of people in the regulatory
agencies and public health departments would like to speak out
but are so intimidated and threatened with dismissal or destruction
of their careers, that they remain silent. As for the media, they
are absolutely clueless.
I have found that “reporters” (we have few real journalists
these days) rarely understand what they are reporting on and always
trust and rely upon people in positions of official power, even
if those people are unqualified to speak on the subject. Most
of the time they run to the Centers for Disease Control or medical
university to seek answers. I cannot count the number of times
I have seen university department heads interviewed when it was
obvious they had no clue as to the subject being discussed. Few
such professors will pass up an opportunity to appear on camera
or be quoted in a newspaper.
One must also appreciate that such reporters and editors are
under an enormous economic strain, as vaccine manufacturers are
major advertisers in all media outlets and for an obvious reason
– it controls content. A number of excellent stories on such
medical subjects are spiked every day. That means we will always
be relegated to the “fringe media” as our media outlets
are called. Despite the high quality of the journalism in many
of the “fringe” outlets, they have a much smaller audience.
And despite this we are having an enormous effect on the debate.
As the Public Awakens, the Collectivist Becomes Desperate
John Jewkes, in his book Ordeal by Planning, observed that as
the British collectivists began to see opposition rise to their
grandiose plans, they became more desperate and aggressive in
their reaction. They then initiated a campaign of smearing their
opponents and blaming every failure on the unwillingness of the
people to accept the planner’s dictates without question.
We certainly have seen this in this debate –opponents to
forced vaccinations are referred to as fringe scientists, kooks,
uneducated, confused, and enemies of public safety – reminiscent
of Stalin’s favorite phrase, “enemy of the people.”
This desperation is based upon their fear that the public might
soon catch on to the fact that the entire vaccine program is based
upon nonsense, fear, and concocted fairy tales. One special fear
of theirs is that the public might discover the fact that most
vaccines are contaminated with a number of known and yet-to-be
discovered viruses, bacteria, viral fragments, and DNA/RNA fragments.
And, further, that our science demonstrates that these contaminants
could lead to a number of slowly-developing degenerative diseases,
including degenerative diseases of the brain. This is rarely discussed
but is of major importance in this debate.
The idea that adults and their children would be forced to submit
to being injected with dozens of these organisms and organic fragments
is terrifying. No regulatory agency is tracking to see if chronic
diseases are rising in the vaccinated, yet we have compelling
evidence of a massive rise in all autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative
diseases, and certain cancers since the advent of a dramatic increase
in the number of vaccines being mandated.
Of special concern is the finding that many of the contaminant
organisms can pass from generation to generation. For example,
new studies have found that SV-40, a major contaminant of the
polio vaccine until 1963, not only existed as a latent virus for
the lifetime of those exposed to the vaccine but was being passed
on to the next generation, primarily by way of sperm, something
called vertical transmission. This means that every generation
from now on will be infected with this known carcinogenic virus.
There is also compelling evidence that some polio vaccines manufactured
after 1963 may contain SV-40 virus.
What makes the SV-40 contamination disaster of such concern is
its association with so many cancers – including mesothelioma,
medulloblastoma, ependymoma, meningioma, astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma,
pituitary adenoma, glioblastoma, osteosarcomas, non-Hodgkins lymphoma,
papillary thyroid carcinomas, and anaplastic thyroid carcinomas.
The Federal government has gone to enormous links to cover up
this association, despite the powerful scientific evidence that
this vaccine infected at least a hundred million people worldwide
with this carcinogenic virus. And, it took over 40 years just
to get this far. Linking vaccine contaminations and immunoexcitotoxicity
to the drastic rise in neurodegenerative diseases will probably
take even longer because of the widespread growth of entrenched
powers high in government and their control of the media, which
is equally extensive. The fact that powerful, enormously wealthy
foundations, such as the Ford Foundation, Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation, and Rockefeller series of foundations, are supporting
forced vaccination greatly enhances the power of governments all
over the World.
These foundations operate in the shadows, influencing legislation
and government actions through the World Health Organization and
individual governmental bodies. Behind every call for forced vaccinations,
mandated quarantines, and home invasions, one can find one of
these foundations providing the money as well as experts. Remember,
the largest of the pharmaceutical-vaccine manufacturers are also
providing much of the money for the foundations and serving on
the boards of these foundations. The Rockefellers either owned
outright or had controlling interest in all of the major pharmaceutical
companies. This has given them absolute and extremely powerful
access to the reins of power at all levels. Yet, they can be defeated
by the truth.
Dr. Blaylock is a board-certified neurosurgeon, author and lecturer.
He attended the LSU School of Medicine in New Orleans, Louisiana
and completed his internship and neurosurgical residency at the
Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, South Carolina.
For the past 24 years he has practiced neurosurgery in addition
to having a nutritional practice for 2 years. Retiring from his
neurosurgical practice to devote full time to nutritional studies
and research, Dr. Blaylock has written and illustrated three books
(Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills, Health and Nutrition Secrets
That Can Save Your Life, and Natural Strategies for The Cancer
Patient). In addition, he has written and illustrated three chapters
in medical textbooks, written a booklet on nutritional protection
against biological terrorism, has an e-booklet on radioprotection
(Nuclear Sunrise), written and illustrated a booklet on multiple
sclerosis, and written over 30 scientific papers in peer-reviewed
journals.
Reference Source 221
December 16, 2009
 ...............................................................................................................
|
